OSVolFan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2010
- Messages
- 848
- Likes
- 1,100
If this ends up being the case, we are screwed. You cannot recruit with an interim and pending sanctions while the UT admin gets around to a hire in the next year. This would be a disaster for the program and likely the end of our ability to recover.This morning, Mark Schlabach (on First Take - ESPNU radio) had an opinion UT would take its time in hiring the new AD, guessing 2-3 months. He mentioned hiring a search firm seems to indicate Plowman's interest in conducting a nationwide search, which if done correctly, would take time. I thought this was interesting, considering many think going slow will be detrimental to the football program.
Of course this also led into the discussion about hiring a new coach. He indicated if the AD hire indeed takes that long, UT likely rides through next year with Steele before making a permanent HC hire.
Do I trust the administration to get it right? If I am going off past hires, no. Securing a legit AD fairly quickly would give me hope. Taking 2-3 months to find that AD would only reinforce the idea our administration still doesn't know what they are doing. JMO
I think that whole thing yesterday was bull$hit. I think they gave Fulmer an easy way out because it preserved his legacy and at least kept us somewhat attractive to outsiders. If you throw the one coach who has actually won here in the last 25 years under the bus it would look awful. And we already are a tough sell to coaches whether us fans want to admit it or not. We don’t need to further our reputation by publicly burning Fulmer. Yesterday Plowman and Boyd did the dance they needed to do w/ Fulmer, but I don’t believe about 90 percent of what i heard.remember in the presser they said they hired the search firm last week BEFORE they announced the firing of Pruitt and retirement of Fulmer. Anyone else find that interesting
wheels have been in motion
finebaum doesn't know jack... but I would be surprised if what he is saying is right. it's going to be easier to get an AD than a HC
completely agree with that... it was window dressing to save his legacy after being fired beforeI think that whole thing yesterday was bull$hit. I think they gave Fulmer an easy way out because it preserved his legacy and at least kept us somewhat attractive to outsiders. If you throw the one coach who has actually won here in the last 25 years under the bus it would look awful. And we already are a tough sell to coaches whether us fans want to admit it or not. We don’t need to further our reputation by publicly burning Fulmer. Yesterday Plowman and Boyd did the dance they needed to do w/ Fulmer, but I don’t believe about 90 percent of what i heard.
I think Gilbert will be AD by weeks endThis morning, Mark Schlabach (on First Take - ESPNU radio) had an opinion UT would take its time in hiring the new AD, guessing 2-3 months. He mentioned hiring a search firm seems to indicate Plowman's interest in conducting a nationwide search, which if done correctly, would take time. I thought this was interesting, considering many think going slow will be detrimental to the football program.
Of course this also led into the discussion about hiring a new coach. He indicated if the AD hire indeed takes that long, UT likely rides through next year with Steele before making a permanent HC hire.
Do I trust the administration to get it right? If I am going off past hires, no. Securing a legit AD fairly quickly would give me hope. Taking 2-3 months to find that AD would only reinforce the idea our administration still doesn't know what they are doing. JMO
Oh I don’t think we need further proof that no one knows what they’re doing up there. To me getting this right is far more important than getting it done fast. Even if an AD is hired fast your pool of coaches at this point in the year will be fairly thin with sanctions hanging over head and an investigation still going.This morning, Mark Schlabach (on First Take - ESPNU radio) had an opinion UT would take its time in hiring the new AD, guessing 2-3 months. He mentioned hiring a search firm seems to indicate Plowman's interest in conducting a nationwide search, which if done correctly, would take time. I thought this was interesting, considering many think going slow will be detrimental to the football program.
Of course this also led into the discussion about hiring a new coach. He indicated if the AD hire indeed takes that long, UT likely rides through next year with Steele before making a permanent HC hire.
Do I trust the administration to get it right? If I am going off past hires, no. Securing a legit AD fairly quickly would give me hope. Taking 2-3 months to find that AD would only reinforce the idea our administration still doesn't know what they are doing. JMO
I don’t agree with you. I don’t think Fulmer had any attention if retiring before mid-season or likely until the last month or so when the investigation became public. No sources just my opinion.Exactly. If anyone thinks Fulmer hasn't been talking to Plowman about retirement for some time now, they're not paying attention. If anything, his announcement and the AD search probably was delayed once the Football allegations were made and the investigation started.
I'm not sure what is more important at this juncture, but the 2022 in-state recruiting class is nearly as vital as an AD and HC for many years down the road. It is the first in-state class that rivals the major talent states and sets the stage for many future classes.I don't think the class of 2022 should be a big factor in any of this. With the right AD hiring the right coach, I believe recruiting would work itself out. Not to mention not knowing how the one time transfer rule would play in all of this. First things first, a competent AD.
It's not about speed, it's about getting both hires done right. I think we should all be patient, these 2 hires will make or break the football program.