n_huffhines
I want for you what you want for immigrants
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2009
- Messages
- 94,081
- Likes
- 57,876
Machines are under-utilized by the male demographic, IMO. I mostly go free weights, but cables and machines serve a purpose. You can hit the muscle in a variety of ways.
Machines are under-utilized by the male demographic, IMO. I mostly go free weights, but cables and machines serve a purpose. You can hit the muscle in a variety of ways.
I generally agree with chavisut's sentiment. In most, not all, but most situations, the more planes of movement possible, the better the workout. Dumbbells > barbells > cables > machines, or however you want to put it. There are some exceptions where certain workouts make little or no use of stabilizers, but machines were not originally designed for serious strength training and IMO tend to be minimized in any routine.
Now there are other reasons, for instance I have occasional issues with my IT band which makes squats very difficult and painful, in which case I will use a sled, but that's to help me recoup from an injury.
A lot of people leave 45s on each side on the bench press & I'm cool will that. If you're benching less than 135 you should probably stick to machines. Back to pet peeves, I hate it when somebody puts 2.5s on leg press or hammer strength & leaves them.
I guess it's assumed in a lot of gyms that leaving the 45 on each side actually makes it easier for the next person.
I don't mind a 45 on each side. That's what the vast majority of men start with anyway.
What's really irritating are the OCD rerackers that rerack every plate even though you are standing there telling them to leave the 45s cause you'll use them. Idiot told me, "sorry man, just following the rules."
I really hate all of the new year's resolutionists that show up en masse with their matching outfits clogging up the gym. I can't wait until February when they quit.
