rjd970
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2007
- Messages
- 24,723
- Likes
- 25,121
The same agency that is so constitutionally principled, that make their living selling lies and interfering in foreign affairs and elections?
My bad.@Orangeburst: I think he figures that quoting you without quoting you is important in some way. Thumbs up.
If this is all true, I'm not convinced that Trump didn't know all along. I've said for a while that I wonder if this isn't all a sting to give the deep state rope to hang themselves, embroil the Dems, and make the case for voter reform.
When will the lemmings realize that the code with the deep state is: Anything they accuse their enemies of doing, it's because that's what they've been doing?
He's ending a war that the deep state has kept going for 30 years.
If you think you're making a point? I posted without commentary, a video containing information I'd heard from several other sources. Is this how you divert from being embarrassed so badly this morning, but being too arrogant to actually just say, "Yah, my bad..."?2020 Presidential Race
Here is you talking about the "deep state"
President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration
My bad for my bad.Make The Deep State Great Again.
President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration
![]()
If you think you're making a point? I posted without commentary, a video containing information I'd heard from several other sources. Is this how you divert from being embarrassed so badly this morning, but being too arrogant to actually just say, "Yah, my bad..."?
That's what's been most frustrating about our most recent interactions. I've agreed with you more than I've disagreed over the years. Still do, as a matter of fact. But I questioned you on one thing--very patiently as a matter of fact--and you went full do*che canoe for little apparebnt reason. It's odd to say the least.Yes, you are posting nonsense, from people you yourself said should not be trusted.
What kind of bot are you?
That's what's been most frustrating about our most recent interactions. I've agreed with you more than I've disagreed over the years. Still do, as a matter of fact. But I questioned you on one thing--very patiently as a matter of fact--and you went full do*che canoe for little apparebnt reason. It's odd to say the least.
Like I said, I saw it and had heard the same thing from several other sources. I posted with no comment. The fact that it was from a former CIA head was not an authority I was appealing to.
Are you OK? Seriously.
And you're welcome to say that. I don't even think I've argued against it. I questioned one aspect of LG's claims about Trump's campaign, and you soiled yourself.I would say the orange man went full on uniparty on foreign policy, it is, what it is.
Because you are trying to sugar coat something. People were tired of all this stuff. There is nothing "peaceful" going on at all right now, matter of fact, we're probably in a global state worse than when they were all running the insane policy. This just appears to be more insanity.And you're welcome to say that. I don't even think I've argued against it. I questioned one aspect of LG's claims about Trump's campaign, and you soiled yourself.
I'll ask again. Are you OK? Or is this just "you"?
How am I trying to sugar coat anything? I've stated plainly what he's doing and repeatedly stated that I'm conflicted about it. I believe that I was actually agreeing with you having basically said your conflicted about it. I've repeatedly clarified that I am not arguing whether it's right or wrong, just asking for proof that one aspect of claims made was true.Because you are trying to sugar coat something. People were tired of all this stuff. There is nothing "peaceful" going on at all right now, matter of fact, we're probably in a global state than when they were all running the insane policy.
If you are good with it, that is your pov.
