The Venezuela thread

What Do You Think About This?

  • Doesn't really make sense.

    Votes: 11 16.7%
  • Unnecessary.

    Votes: 21 31.8%
  • I love it! We can get more oil!

    Votes: 20 30.3%
  • I can see why it might happen, but not comfortable with it.

    Votes: 14 21.2%

  • Total voters
    66
"Our current strategy of nation-building and regime change is a proven, absolute failure."

- Donald Trump, from a 2016 Republican Presidential Primary debate, he would later specificically cite Iraq, Libya, Egypt and Syria as examples.

"We need to stop racing to topple foreign regimes, that we know nothing about, that we shouldn't be involved with."

- Donald Trump, in a 2015 interview with Sean Hannity, where he called Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton "war-mongers."

This is a remarkable shift in ideology.
How so?
 
Last administration puts 25M bounty on “head” of Latin American country. Trump gets the head of Latin American country mentioned and it’s kidnapping.

Liberal logic for those with TDS.

I think its called international kidnapping. Nothing new though. The U.S. has been doing it for 50+ years, sometimes it doesn't go as planned. 😂

Abu Omar case - Wikipedia
 
Trump has to get this right, I know I’m stating the obvious, but a failure here will lead to a Bernie acolyte as our next president. They’re gonna go as far left as they can if this is a flop. Huge gamble. On a side note, politics aside, I pray the Venezuelan people get what they deserve.. I saw something that showed that the population lost 19% in body weight after socialization kicked in.
It started Sat. with the celebrations by the people.

The left will go against all things Trump while he’s in office, so no matter if he’s right, it’ll be wrong for them to up the charade.
 
"Our current strategy of nation-building and regime change is a proven, absolute failure."

- Donald Trump, from a 2016 Republican Presidential Primary debate, he would later specificically cite Iraq, Libya, Egypt and Syria as examples.

"We need to stop racing to topple foreign regimes, that we know nothing about, that we shouldn't be involved with."

- Donald Trump, in a 2015 interview with Sean Hannity, where he called Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton "war-mongers."

This is a remarkable shift in ideology.
I'm certain I am in the minority opinion on this but I think it is a remarkable shift in rhetoric. I don't think DJT embraces an ideology outside of 'I do what I want'.
America-first seems to include acting in America's interest on the global stage. So, one would have to ask if a nuclear Iran would have possibly been a detriment to the US, and whether the claims that Maduro has been asymmetrically attacking the US are true.

So, for that to be a shift in rhetoric, I guess one would have to prove/assume that the Trump admin is using the same strategy, and that they are "nation building" in the same way, and in situations that don't affect the US.

America-First has never been posed as a binary that we will not be active on the global stage or in our hemisphere. My understanding was just the opposite. It was a promise that we'll act when needed, and it will be for our benefit when we do.
 
I think its called international kidnapping. Nothing new though. The U.S. has been doing it for 50+ years, sometimes it doesn't go as planned. 😂

Abu Omar case - Wikipedia
One man’s “kidnapping” is another man’s “arrest”. Recently, the left has been calling ICE arrest operations “kidnappings”. They’re boiling the frogs. Also, something that they started to say and backfired was “don’t follow any unlawful orders”. Senator Kelly will be made an example of.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
I would look at it as a shift in the world order.
Trump's foreign policy mantra of isolationism and non-interventionist rhetoric had a lot to do with his meteoric rise in popularity in 2015. The MAGA crowd ate it up.

It's hard to make sense of what the United States foreign policy stands for right now. It's chaotic as hell.
 
Trump's foreign policy mantra of isolationism and non-interventionist rhetoric had a lot to do with his meteoric rise in popularity in 2015. The MAGA crowd ate it up.

It's hard to make sense of what the United States foreign policy stands for right now. It's chaotic as hell.
It stands for America-First, I do believe. And do you have any quotes that Trump promised "isolationism", as opposed to the America-first quotes that you misrepresented above?
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary
Trump's foreign policy mantra of isolationism and non-interventionist rhetoric had a lot to do with his meteoric rise in popularity in 2015. The MAGA crowd ate it up.

It's hard to make sense of what the United States foreign policy stands for right now. It's chaotic as hell.

It would appears to be a new world order which I didn't want to believe a few weeks ago. The person I spoke appears to be correct. (we'll see)

I'm torn on the subject, but lots of people are going to have to go.
 
"Our current strategy of nation-building and regime change is a proven, absolute failure."

- Donald Trump, from a 2016 Republican Presidential Primary debate, he would later specifically cite Iraq, Libya, Egypt and Syria as examples.

"We need to stop racing to topple foreign regimes, that we know nothing about, that we shouldn't be involved with."

- Donald Trump, in a 2015 interview with Sean Hannity, where he called Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton "war-mongers."

This is a remarkable shift in ideology.

At least for the time being this regime change does look different than the ones Trump mentioned in the debate. With all of those we just didn't take out the principle, we took out the entire bureaucracy and military leadership. IMO taking out the entire govt structure was a mistake, it created a power vacuum to great to peacefully transition.
 
At least for the time being this regime change does different than the ones Trump mentioned in the debate. With all of those we just didn't take out the principle, we took out the entire bureaucracy and military leadership. IMO taking out the entire govt structure was a mistake, it created a power vacuum to great to peacefully transition.
This may be the CIA learning from past mistakes. Interesting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: USF grad in TN
At least for the time being this regime change does different than the ones Trump mentioned in the debate. With all of those we just didn't take out the principle, we took out the entire bureaucracy and military leadership. IMO taking out the entire govt structure was a mistake, it created a power vacuum to great to peacefully transition.

As long as they generally do what they are told i.e. don't answer the call from China, I would assume the U.S. will stay out of it. Hard to imagine how things remain stable for long though. 🤷‍♂️
 
As long as they generally do what they are told i.e. don't answer the call from China, I would assume the U.S. will stay out of it. Hard to imagine how things remain stable for long though. 🤷‍♂️
My guess is we will have a presence. Especially as security around their oilfields. I believe that is the key to Venezuelas prosperity
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
America-first seems to include acting in America's interest on the global stage. So, one would have to ask if a nuclear Iran would have possibly been a detriment to the US, and whether the claims that Maduro has been asymmetrically attacking the US are true.

So, for that to be a shift in rhetoric, I guess one would have to prove/assume that the Trump admin is using the same strategy, and that they are "nation building" in the same way, and in situations that don't affect the US.

America-First has never been posed as a binary that we will not be active on the global stage or in our hemisphere. My understanding was just the opposite. It was a promise that we'll act when needed, and it will be for our benefit when we do.
You can't reconcile this approach to Venezuela with Trump's 2016 campaign rhetoric concerning foreign policy.

A denial of that isn't reasonable.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top