The Problem of Whiteness

#52
#52
The problem with whiteness is that I only have a 4" vertical leap, no rhythm and a small ^#$is. ****s not fair.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#53
#53
#56
#56
Sounds like a great course.

Would be great if it were a requirement for all students. Unfortunately I think only students already open to racial justice will take that course.

This type of course is actually more necessary for those hostile to the concept than those open to it.
Hitler was an advocate for racial justice too
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#57
#57
He/she is completely separated from history. Progressives allied with Hitler in the 20s-40s to develop eugenics programs that would purify the bloodlines (whiteness). Such programs actually passed forced-sterilization legislation in US state gov'ts, and literally force-steralized American citizens! All from self-professed progressive/liberals.

Funny FYI... One of those eugenics organizations became Planned Parenthood, the modern progressive cow bell.

Sad that eugenics have been smeared by the Nazis and Progressives in this country.
 
#58
#58
See Somalia, Chad, Rwanda and etc.

The problems in those countries was precipitated by white colonialism.

If white people didn't at first pillage millions of black people from the African continent to be slaves in a new world and then come back to pillage trillions of dollars worth of natural resources during colonialism, Africa wouldn't be at the stage it is right now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#59
#59
Imagine for a few moments what the world would be like today if populated only by people of color.

It would be no different. One group would be seen as the majority for some artifical reason and maintain a level of power while everyone else fought for their piece. I would rather imagine a world where we didn't categorize and label,but I also like unicorns.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#60
#60
That's the way I feel about conservatives. Ironic.

It just seems that history always seems to prove one side over the other.

True conservatives don't force their views on anyone because they believe in limited government. It's liberals who are arrogant enough to believe they are right about everything and therefor should force their will on the people.

As for your belief that black people were helped by welfare, you should really do some research. Here's a great place to start.

https://youtu.be/lm-FqtAOSB8

When you subsidize something you get more of it. When you subsidize poverty, you get more poverty. Welfare has destroyed black communities by making failure beneficial.
 
#61
#61
I guess colleges should start teaching the problem with blackness......millennial pantywaist?

Unnecessary. We are already inundated with that every day thanks to the white supremacist media.

Courses like the one at UW are actually necessary to rid us of this anti-black/pro-white bias were are inundated with.
 
#62
#62
I do indeed. It's the exact same mentality of the people against integration in the 60's and gay marriage today.

[liberals not named luthervol] that say tolerate everyone then turns around and calls Christians stupid rednecks? Liberalism is inconsistent.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#63
#63
Unnecessary. We are already inundated with that every day thanks to the white supremacist media.

Courses like the one at UW are actually necessary to rid us of this anti-black/pro-white bias were are inundated with.

If you want to blame anyone for black failure, blame liberal policies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#64
#64
Women's Suffrage (voting)? 19th Amendment presented by Republicans and voted down by a Democratically controlled congress. Finally ratified 40 years later when Republicans won landslide control of Congress.

House Joint Resolution No. 184 (The first legislation to begin the end of Child Labor)? Submitted by Republican, Israel Moore Foster.

Desegregation?

~80% Repubs voted for it.
Less than 70% of Dems voted for it.

partycivilrights.jpeg

How do democrats lose these facts during these discussions?!
 
#65
#65
Unnecessary. We are already inundated with that every day thanks to the white supremacist media.

Courses like the one at UW are actually necessary to rid us of this anti-black/pro-white bias were are inundated with.

White supremacist media? 99% of major media (CNN, hln, cbs, abc, NBC, MSNBC) do nothing but portray the majority of whites as racist and deplorable!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#66
#66
Unnecessary. We are already inundated with that every day thanks to the white supremacist media.

Courses like the one at UW are actually necessary to rid us of this anti-black/pro-white bias were are inundated with.

White supremacist media....who's that?

There's not a black supremacist media around?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#70
#70
You forgot play-doh and crayola would be out of business
Countless puppies would have no one to hold them
People in New York would be fat again because they wouldn't be restricted on Sosa size
And fwiw, it wasn't the party of the liberals who ended slavery, they voted against it and then formed the kkk.

FYI the democratic and republican party haven't always been progressive or conservative. They've changed idelogies quite a few times. In the 1850s the republicans were actually the progressive party while the democrats were conservative.

Remember the term "conservative" means to conserve, to keep things the same, to follow tradition. While "progressive" means to progress, to move forward. To suggest the party that was fighting to keep the tradition of slavery (the democrats) were the "progressive" party and the party looking to end the tradition of slavery (the republicans) were the "conservative" party is laughable. Its obvious that at that time the conservative thing was to continue the tradition of slavery while the progressive thing was to move beyond it. To "progress".

Same thing happened during the civil rights movement. The parties flipped. The south used to be democrat and the north republican. After the democrats supported the civil rights bill, white southerners became overwhelmingly republican while the northerners became democrat. And thus the parties shifted with the republicans becoming more conservative and the democrats becoming more progressive.

If you have any questions just look how black people voted. After Lincoln they voted republican because that was the progressive party. Then the democrats supported civil rights while republicans opposed it so black folks became democrat.

We typically vote for the progressive party because we got nothing to conserve cause America hasn't been good to us in the past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#71
#71
FYI the democratic and republican party haven't always been progressive or conservative. They've changed idelogies quite a few times. In the 1850s the republicans were actually the progressive party while the democrats were conservative.

Remember the term "conservative" means to conserve, to keep things the same, to follow tradition. While "progressive" means to progress, to move forward. To suggest the party that was fighting to keep the tradition of slavery (the democrats) were the "progressive" party and the party looking to end the tradition of slavery (the republicans) were the "conservative" party is laughable. Its obvious that at that time the conservative thing was to continue the tradition of slavery while the progressive thing was to move beyond it. To "progress".

Same thing happened during the civil rights movement. The parties flipped. The south used to be democrat and the north republican. After the democrats supported the civil rights bill, white southerners became overwhelmingly republican while the northerners became democrat. And thus the parties shifted with the republicans becoming more conservative and the democrats becoming more progressive.

If you have any questions just look how black people voted. After Lincoln they voted republican because that was the progressive party. Then the democrats supported civil rights while republicans opposed it so black folks became democrat.

We typically vote for the progressive party because we got nothing to conserve cause America hasn't been good to us in the past.

How's that strategy working out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#73
#73
The better question is where would blacks be without welfare. My bet: race relations would be better than ever for several reasons. Black people would have better economic mobility as a group. Housing projects wouldn't exist, and that in conjunction with a more economically mobile black population, would lead to more diversity in suburbs and nice neighborhoods and fewer "bad parts of town". Simply put, welfare is the plantation. Quit voting for more of it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#75
#75
First off the computers we are typing on wouldnt exist, neither would the electricity to power them, and neither would the university that enables these dumb professors.

And that barely scratches the surface.

Not surprising. When you are inundated with white supremacist propaganda ignorant stuff like this come out.

FYI the university at Timbuktu is older than Oxford University (the oldest university in Europe). So this idea that white people are necessary for the existence of universities is another white supremacist lie. Black people have had institutions of higher learning for longer than any white people.

And in fact if not for the Moors that ruled Spain and brought civilization back to Europe, white people would still be in the dark ages. So you can thank black Africans for bringing you the first European universities.

And in case you were wondering here is Dennis Hopper to remind you that the Moors were black. https://youtu.be/trBxPFLq__g
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person

VN Store



Back
Top