Crazy Ivan
Carpe Jugulum
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Messages
- 8,558
- Likes
- 16,860
I agree completely. I was just listing names on the board that were considered big hires.
I should've included the /s. It was in response to Kelly being exposed by the SEC.
And to be fair, Saban didn't lose in his 8th year.
Dan Mullen did all of this at Mississippi State. Not at Auburn, Not at LSU, Not at Bama, Not at A&M, but at Mississippi State. In the west, it's the poorest athletic department. Facilities and revenue. It's not even the most popular school in the state! It's the third poorest in the whole sec behind vandy and mizzou. In 9 seasons, He's had a winning record, pushing for another 10 win season, 5 bowl victories. Now imagine what he could do at tennessee. Bigger wallet, a more sellable brand for recruits, an easier side of the conference.
Gruden has never made one recruiting trip. He's coached grown talented men who make money. He's an x's and o's guy. I personally like gruden. His overall record in the nfl is 15 wins over .500. The time for Gruden is over though. I would've been estatic if he was named HC instead of Dooley or Butch. But now I want someone who's a winner at the P5 level. Which Mullen is.
I have a hard time spending $6+ million on a guy with a losing record last year (in his 8th year). With losses to South Alabama and Kentucky... and a near loss to UMass this year and last. I don't think that great coaches lose cupcakes in their 8th year.
if you want to question mullen, i agree, that's it. you know how i feel about mullen. and i've said it many times, he's not my #1, but he's certainly considerable as a candidate. and i think there's enough good there on his resume that can overcome many, if not all, of the shortcomings if paired with a program like TN, and expectations like TN would bring.
the reason he's not higher on lists, is because of that kind of question though.
it's still not a reason to simply not consider him, imo.
This is the type of crap that has kept us from winning the SEC for 20 years. We accept mediocrity and think it will, magically, get better by sheer hope, "fan support" or other such nonsense. You want to win a championship? Go hire someone who's won one, not someone who did pretty good with what he's had and think the magic of The Hill will push him over the top. Mullen is alright, nothing special, thus far as a coach and there's no reason to think that he'll be anything otherwise at UT.
However, based upon the type of think prevailing at the UT campus over the years, I fully expect to see Mullen at the podium in Knoxville next week.
Oh look someone else can make up a lie too. NCAA baggage? Gimme a break.
Just curious, are you honestly saying nattys are possible at MSU?
This is the type of crap that has kept us from winning the SEC for 20 years. We accept mediocrity and think it will, magically, get better by sheer hope, "fan support" or other such nonsense. You want to win a championship? Go hire someone who's won one, not someone who did pretty good with what he's had and think the magic of The Hill will push him over the top. Mullen is alright, nothing special, thus far as a coach and there's no reason to think that he'll be anything otherwise at UT.
However, based upon the type of think prevailing at the UT campus over the years, I fully expect to see Mullen at the podium in Knoxville next week.
It doesn't have to be a NC at MSU, just win or do something of significance. He's finished above 4th in the division once in 9 years. This means 8 out of 9 years, he's been in the bottom half of the division in the SEC West. What's remarkable about this? I know it's a tough division, but, if he's a great coach, then he should be able to punch above his weight more often.
