The Impeachment Thread

I seriously just wish that the Dems had taken their time and let it play out in courts, but nobody asked me.

Once it gets into the Senate will all those people that Trump blocked come to testify? (So there would be no obstruction) That would be interesting.
 
Really? I could be wrong but I thought I heard Graham say they wouldn't take it up over hearsay

They have to, I don't think they have a choice.

Why wouldn't they want to take it up? They can call whatever witnesses they want and ask whatever questions they want, perfect opportunity to show the world what the Dems are.
 
I seriously just wish that the Dems had taken their time and let it play out in courts, but nobody asked me.

Once it gets into the Senate will all those people that Trump blocked come to testify? (So there would be no obstruction) That would be interesting.
I’ve seen some speculation that Roberts presiding over the trial will be able to cut through some of the red tape of having to go through the courts. No idea because it’s a pretty unprecedented situation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JCP201
They have to, I don't think they have a choice.

Why wouldn't they want to take it up? They can call whatever witnesses they want and ask whatever questions they want, perfect opportunity to show the world what the Dems are.
I thought I heard they didn't have to but you could be right

I agree with that part of it, also that will keep all Senators in DC and off the campaign trail so I'm surprised they want that.
 
I am when it comes to you. You hate liberals and democrats. Your petulant need to argue with them and give the Redhats a pass is noted and well documented.

Dude you can’t be this dense , I probably have more family , friends and neighbors that are liberals / Dems than you do . Lol my petulant need to argue has nothing to do with hate and mostly has to do with stupid and or hypocritical posts of which your history is loaded with .
 
I for one, would love to see Trump, Rudy, and Mulvaney all testify under oath.

You raise a critical point. When SCOTUS Chief Justice Roberts presides over the Senate hearing, he theoretically can issue bench rulings on this issue. He conceivably could demand their appearance on behalf of the SCOTUS. It's not impossible, but unlikely.
 
Would be fun having a hearing not controlled by $hitty schiff so for once we can have a fair hearing and where all witnesses can be called not just those who that pencil neck twerp wants to hear from.
 
You raise a critical point. When SCOTUS Chief Justice Roberts presides over the Senate hearing, he theoretically can issue bench rulings on this issue. He conceivably could demand their appearance on behalf of the SCOTUS. It's not impossible, but unlikely.

Even Roberts can't force a defendant to testify.
 
Dude you can’t be this dense , I probably have more family , friends and neighbors that are liberals / Dems than you do . Lol my petulant need to argue has nothing to do with hate and mostly has to do with stupid and or hypocritical posts of which your history is loaded with .

You don't know me or many other people on this board, but my assessment of you is spot on based on your posts.
 
The news just keeps getting worse for the Dims today.

Historic USMCA deal is much better than NAFTA: Pelosi

"There is no question, of course, that this trade agreement is much better than NAFTA," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said at a press conference announcing her caucus's support of the agreement. Major U.S. stock indexes turned positive after the announcement.

I’m gonna guess Nans died a lot inside when she said that 😂
 
Advertisement

Back
Top