evillawyer
Have No God Before His Orangeness
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 33,342
- Likes
- 21,834
But surely you agree that it’s disappointing to see this much slack in the line that represents the right’s efforts to resist the left’s push to replace to replace morality and God with the law.And you can thank the cry wolf narrative that has been continual since Nov 2016 for that. To quote Luther “it’s completely reasonable and rational”![]()
I give up with them, if they hear it on CNN or MSNBC its fact regardless what the witness says who by the way is their own witnessSaying this over & over again with no proof that it indeed happened does not make this true...no matter how many times you close your eyes and click your heels and wish for it to become true.......not reality.
NO president. as in none... would go to the hill to testify for this kind of crap. Your leftists are gonna keep bringing witnesses that say nothing until they get that one that has an impression that Mr Trump did something wrong. And then it will be non-stop 24/7 MSM crowing about it... completely discounting the 300 other witnesses that said nothing was improper. The Queen Bitch of the Left is not president. She wants to be relevant. She will stand up and talk to congress for the rest of her miserable, bitter life as long as she's in the public eye.Wut.
so you get your information from jimmy kimmel? LOL at youThe residents of Trumplandia speak
Trump fans defend Watergate scandal when Kimmel swaps Nixon's name for Trump's
NO president. as in none... would go to the hill to testify for this kind of crap. Your leftists are gonna keep bringing witnesses that say nothing until they get that one that has an impression that Mr Trump did something wrong. And then it will be non-stop 24/7 MSM crowing about it... completely discounting the 300 other witnesses that said nothing was improper. The Queen Bitch of the Left is not president. She wants to be relevant. She will stand up and talk to congress for the rest of her miserable, bitter life as long as she's in the public eye.
I think one of the R members last night was trying to get at this very topic with the lady, I can't recall her last nameAnd as we have seen with all the previous scathing opening statements, it goes down hill quickly from there once they have to answer questions under oath and forego the narrative Schiff wrote for them.
I think it makes a shtty president look guilty and I think he'd rather look guilty than be found guilty. Congress has subpoena power and has the tools to enforce it, they're simply choosing not to do it because it takes time.
I absolutely think trump is unfit for the presidency, long before this - the only problem I have with trumps actions is that he was using taxpayer dollars to dig up dirt on a political rival. That's what dictators do. I don't think that's an impeachable offense. Scummy and unbecoming of the presidency, yes. Worth firing for, no.
I think it makes a shtty president look guilty and I think he'd rather look guilty than be found guilty. Congress has subpoena power and has the tools to enforce it, they're simply choosing not to do it because it takes time.
I absolutely think trump is unfit for the presidency, long before this - the only problem I have with trumps actions is that he was using taxpayer dollars to dig up dirt on a political rival. That's what dictators do. I don't think that's an impeachable offense. Scummy and unbecoming of the presidency, yes. Worth firing for, no.
An impeachable offense is whatever a majority of the House of Representatives considers it to be at a given moment in history.That’s fair. I agree with most of what you’ve said.
I think the bribery statute thing is a stretch because it requires too broad an application of that statute, and would unreasonably hamper future presidents. But add the element that the exploitation of the office for personal gain was at the expense of the national interest and it fits the bill for removal.
I can’t conceptualize an impeachable offense if that isn’t it.
JMO
Did you feel the same way about Obama? What about Hillary? I'm sure you think Joe and Joe jr should be held to the same scrutiny?I think it makes a shtty president look guilty and I think he'd rather look guilty than be found guilty. Congress has subpoena power and has the tools to enforce it, they're simply choosing not to do it because it takes time.
I absolutely think trump is unfit for the presidency, long before this - the only problem I have with trumps actions is that he was using taxpayer dollars to dig up dirt on a political rival. That's what dictators do. I don't think that's an impeachable offense. Scummy and unbecoming of the presidency, yes. Worth firing for, no.