The Impeachment Thread

#32,576
#32,576
BowlBrother85 said:
One of John Solomon's most significant accusations was that Marie Yovanovitch provided a "do not prosecute" list to Ukrainian prosecutor, Yuri Lutsenko. Lutsenko now says that did not happen.
Click to expand...
Go on and refute what NCFisher posted. The above just doesn't cut it. But nice try.
 
#32,577
#32,577
BowlBrother85 said:
One of John Solomon's most significant accusations was that Marie Yovanovitch provided a "do not prosecute" list to Ukrainian prosecutor, Yuri Lutsenko. Lutsenko now says that did not happen.
Click to expand...
I believe he reported that Lutsenko told him so. Who knows who is telling the truth when it comes to those Ukranians? They may be more corrupt than the Obama Regime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher, W.TN.Orange Blood and 37L1
#32,580
#32,580
BowlBrother85 said:
Isn't that what Republicans did to Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, Fiona Hill and William Taylor following their testimony before the House?
Click to expand...

They should have because it was clear that they were against the President. Taylor what a freaking tool conveniently a last minute being made aware of San overheard phone call between the President and Sondland. Get that hearsay crap back where it belongs. All career diplomats.
 
#32,585
#32,585
vols40 said:
They should have because it was clear that they were against the President. Taylor what a freaking tool conveniently a last minute being made aware of San overheard phone call between the President and Sondland. Get that hearsay crap back where it belongs. All career diplomats.
Click to expand...
Against the President's personal agenda. They're true patriots unlike Trump and his proud supporters
 
#32,588
#32,588
BowlBrother85 said:
The only information I need, is that you linked to an opinion piece by John Solomon, who is a Trump flunky whose reporting on the Ukraine has been proven to be false, repeatedly. Substantial reporting from outlets including ProPublica and the Daily Beast show that Solomon spread disinformation about Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden and the former US Ambassador to the Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch. In his work, Solomon effectively laundered dirt provided to him by Donald Trump's attorney, Rudy Giuliani. The foremost allegation made by Solomon was published by the Hill in March, when Solomon interviewed the former prosecutor Yuri Lutsenko. In the interview, he accused then-US Ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch of giving him a do-not-prosecute list to stop corruption. The accusation was proven to be false, and it was ultimately recanted by Lutsenko himself.

The long and short of it: If you are going to post a dissertation, you should choose a better source. John Solomon and the word "facts" do not belong in the same headline. Solomon is a Trump minion and a proven liar who peddles disinformation given to him by Rudy Giuliani, which Giuliani in turn, cites on cable news. It's one big circle jerk. It is impossible to read the name "John Solomon" and take anything else seriously. The guy has an agenda.
Click to expand...

Nonsense, you're talking out your rear and you know it. Childish dismissal of sources, government & congressional testimony and documents by yelling Identify "Trump flunky" or "Faux News" are not rebuttal. Detail the falsehoods; I can wait.

To the only point you attempt to make; no, Lutsenko did not recant. Solomon also reported he did not recant, even as leftist media says he did. So who's right?

Let's refer to this Dec. 8, 2019 Lutsenko interview, you can jump to 1:55 minutes:

It cannot have been proven false as you claim - since it was a meeting between two people - nor can it be proven true. But he sure as hell didn't recant, did he?

Falsehood strike #1.

Maybe Solomon's agenda is reporting things the left doesn't like, dismisses in drive-by fashion, and hopes no one notices.
Spend less time pilloring with easy insults, do the work and refute the reporting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DC_Vol, BigOrangeD and 37L1
#32,589
#32,589
vols40 said:
Source?
Click to expand...
I can't provide a link from this phone I'm using but if you Google "Ukraine Prosecutor General Lutsenko admits U.S. ambassador didn't give him a do not prosecute list", and you will immediately see an article by "Unian", as well as John Solomon's false report in The Hill from March.
 
#32,592
#32,592
USAFgolferVol said:
Yeah, Trump acknowledged it. He's also been too cozy with Putin the entire time he's been POTUS. And no, it's not fact he's been tough on Russia.

I've thought this through from every angle. Some you could never imagine.
Click to expand...

That's a non-response.
You said policy that benefits Russia is treason. Now, glancing off my power shield of objectivity, you don't think so. Ain't that funny....

Was Obama tougher on Russia? I've thought it through and detailed it, so choose wisely.
 
#32,593
#32,593
NCFisher said:
Nonsense, you're talking out your rear and you know it. Childish dismissal of sources, government & congressional testimony and documents by yelling Identify "Trump flunky" or "Faux News" are not rebuttal. Detail the falsehoods; I can wait.

To the only point you attempt to make; no, Lutsenko did not recant. Solomon also reported he did not recant, even as leftist media says he did. So who's right?

Let's refer to this Dec. 8, 2019 Lutsenko interview, you can jump to 1:55 minutes:

It cannot have been proven false as you claim - since it was a meeting between two people - nor can it be proven true. But he sure as hell didn't recant, did he?

Falsehood strike #1.

Maybe Solomon's agenda is reporting things the left doesn't like, dismisses in drive-by fashion, and hopes no one notices.
Spend less time pilloring with easy insults, do the work and refute the reporting.
Click to expand...

Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooom!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Another hit by NCFisher.

Your Battleship is starting to sink BowlBrother85.
 
#32,595
#32,595
NCFisher said:
Nonsense, you're talking out your rear and you know it. Childish dismissal of sources, government & congressional testimony and documents by yelling Identify "Trump flunky" or "Faux News" are not rebuttal. Detail the falsehoods; I can wait.

To the only point you attempt to make; no, Lutsenko did not recant. Solomon also reported he did not recant, even as leftist media says he did. So who's right?

Let's refer to this Dec. 8, 2019 Lutsenko interview, you can jump to 1:55 minutes:

It cannot have been proven false as you claim - since it was a meeting between two people - nor can it be proven true. But he sure as hell didn't recant, did he?

Falsehood strike #1.

Maybe Solomon's agenda is reporting things the left doesn't like, dismisses in drive-by fashion, and hopes no one notices.
Spend less time pilloring with easy insults, do the work and refute the reporting.
Click to expand...

Lutsenko did recant. He now says that Marie Yovanovitch did not give him a "do not prosecute" list.

Separately, Lutsenko is also under investigation now for his own corruption. Per USA Today: Authorities in the Ukraine opened an investigation into Lutsenko in October for providing cover to illegal gambling businesses in Ukraine.
 
#32,598
#32,598
USAFgolferVol said:
Yeah, you're right. 22 years of active military service and then 10 years of governmental service will do that to you. You probably have a better idea as to what it means to love this country than me. Sorry for questioning you
Click to expand...
How did you ever become a liberal sunshine pumper after serving our country for 22 years? Thanks for your service by the way. Must have been the Govmnt job?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
#32,599
#32,599
BowlBrother85 said:
Lutsenko has recanted. He now says that Marie Yovanovitch did not give him a "do not prosecute" list.

Separately, Lutsenko is also under investigation now for his own corruption. Per USA Today: Authorities in the Ukraine opened an investigation into Lutsenko in October for providing cover to illegal gambling businesses in Ukraine.
Click to expand...
So what you are saying is Solomon was truthful/accurate when he said Lutsenko did say that there was a list and that Lutsenko then later changed his story. Your problem would appear to be with Lutsenko and not Solomon.

What else you got, because that ain't it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
#32,600
#32,600
NCFisher said:
Nonsense, you're talking out your rear and you know it. Childish dismissal of sources, government & congressional testimony and documents by yelling Identify "Trump flunky" or "Faux News" are not rebuttal. Detail the falsehoods; I can wait.

To the only point you attempt to make; no, Lutsenko did not recant. Solomon also reported he did not recant, even as leftist media says he did. So who's right?

Let's refer to this Dec. 8, 2019 Lutsenko interview, you can jump to 1:55 minutes:

It cannot have been proven false as you claim - since it was a meeting between two people - nor can it be proven true. But he sure as hell didn't recant, did he?

Falsehood strike #1.

Maybe Solomon's agenda is reporting things the left doesn't like, dismisses in drive-by fashion, and hopes no one notices.
Spend less time pilloring with easy insults, do the work and refute the reporting.
Click to expand...


Savage.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher, 37L1 and BigOrangeD
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top