so obama is now banning bullets?

#26
#26
Dave1967 said:
Is there a point where you would be for revolt? I think we're nearing that time
Click to expand...

There is but we're not there yet. As to your previous post, there is no earthly way possible for the government to ever go door to door collecting guns. One there is not enough manpower to do that and two there are too many guns on our streets (not that I'm against it).
 
#28
#28
Burhead said:
There is but we're not there yet. As to your previous post, there is no earthly way possible for the government to ever go door to door collecting guns. One there is not enough manpower to do that and two there are too many guns on our streets (not that I'm against it).
Click to expand...

I'm against gun confiscation totally
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#29
#29
On the bright side be glad it's an EO, the next GOPer President can do away with this the minute after being sworn in.
 
#32
#32
Luckily my 7.62 armor piercing hollow tips will be safe because if we all only know one thing its that a 5.56's are way, way more lethal..


Time to upgrade to SKS's everyone!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#34
#34
Dave1967 said:
You sound like you're for it with the guns on the street comment
Click to expand...

I'm saying I don't have a problem with the millions of guns on the streets. I'm a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment, in fact we just bought a new shotgun this past weekend. :rock:
 
#35
#35
LouderVol said:
talked with my uncle a while ago about this happening. Nothing in the constitution about bullets being protected.
Click to expand...

Well, sort of. What you could see is an argument over what constitutes "protected". For instance, banning ammo to any great extent would essentially be a de facto gun ban which is clearly a 2nd Amendment issue. If it were a 1st Amendment issue imagine allowing free speech but not allowing to use your tongue.

So yes, I think it would (and should) be nigh impossible to ban any ammo without specific and sufficient cause being demonstrated regarding the 2A. This is actually what's going on here though as they are trying to get M855 regulated under the GCA's "armor piercing" definition.
 
#36
#36
Burhead said:
I'm saying I don't have a problem with the millions of guns on the streets. I'm a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment, in fact we just bought a new shotgun this past weekend. :rock:
Click to expand...

I do think the banning of ammunition is the first step to confiscation of guns. The Feds can look up gun owners with the gun registration records.
 
#37
#37
FLVOL_79 said:
Luckily my 7.62 armor piercing hollow tips will be safe because if we all only know one thing its that a 5.56's are way, way more lethal..


Time to upgrade to SKS's everyone!
Click to expand...

I want to add one to my collection one day.
 
#41
#41
Dave1967 said:
I do think the banning of ammunition is the first step to confiscation of guns. The Feds can look up gun owners with the gun registration records.
Click to expand...

Maybe, maybe not. We're a country of over 300 million people. Even if you combine the entire law enforcement/military and tell them to start collecting guns (you and both know there would be dissenters) they wouldn't have enough manpower to collect every single firearm in existence.
 
#42
#42
Vol8188 said:
I have no problem with this. It's no different than other bullet bans that already exist
Click to expand...

Do you even have the first clue where the basis for "bullet bans" is located?

If you're even the slightest libertarian based (and I highly doubt you are) you would know the basis is tied for the worst piece of gun control legislation ever introduced where freedoms were concerned.
 
#44
#44
lawgator1 said:
Yes, AR-15 owners only have dozens of other types of ammo to buy, but, dang it, they NEED the armor piercing rounds. You know, in case they are out hunting and get attacked by a bunny rabbit wearing body armor.
Click to expand...

Rabbits are foul, vicious, aggresive demons with an unquenchable bloodlust. They possess a keen knack for stealthy ambush and use their razor sharp fangs and talons to pierce the flesh of their unsuspecting victims. They disembowel their prey and feast upon the entrails before death provides sweet release to the attacked. After they are satiated on warm carrion , they return to their burrow and await the next opportunity to slay for mere sport.

Many brave knights on a quest for the HoltyGrail were slaughtered by this beast. May their sun dried bones serve as an omen to all who underestimate the ravenous rabbit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#46
#46
Grand Vol said:
Do you even have the first clue where the basis for "bullet bans" is located?

If you're even the slightest libertarian based (and I highly doubt you are) you would know the basis is tied for the worst piece of gun control legislation ever introduced where freedoms were concerned.
Click to expand...

there is no doubt about it
 
#49
#49
McDad said:
Rabbits are foul, vicious, aggresive demons with an unquenchable bloodlust. They possess a keen knack for stealthy ambush and use their razor sharp fangs and talons to pierce the flesh of their unsuspecting victims. They disembowel their prey and feast upon the entrails before death provides sweet release to the attacked. After they are satiated on warm carrion , they return to their burrow and await the next opportunity to slay for mere sport.

Many brave knights on a quest for the HoltyGrail were slaughtered by this beast. May their sun dried bones serve as an omen to all who underestimate the ravenous rabbit.
Click to expand...

Where's this beast? Behind the rabbit?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top