MajorJohnny
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2012
- Messages
- 229
- Likes
- 168
Let's hope people smarter than us can resolve this mess. I love Tennessee football and have as long as I can remember (and I hit 60 yesterday) and it kills me to see this crap going on.
Same here buddy. And how did 60 hit you. I'm not that far but for some reason I'm dreading that one the most
Worse than the other decade birthdays for some reason. I'm not sure why. I'm still in good health and married to the same woman for 37 years. I guess it's the realization that time keeps going. I still remember my first Tennessee football game (Vandy 1965) like it was yesterday.
SIAP, but how does this work if UT wants to settle and the plaintiffs don't?
I truly detest your school, everything about it, if a comet hits it during your spring game not one tear would be shed by me to give you perspective where I'm coming from in the rest of this. I do appreciate your perspective as a professional if you actually are, it's the a representing attorney would give, it is solid advice. I often have counseled people through the years to hire the best professionals you can and then take their advice. I suspect UT has insurance and at some point the professionals there will require settlement, I get it, that's what you chaps do on the regular and is standard process. However, if UT does not plan on turning this over as an insurance claim, I prefer scorched earth take no prisoners prevail in court and drag this out bankrupting the accusers and law firms devoting time to this matter. If it two decades so be it.
One thing to consider is the number of plaintiffs; that makes potential awards so much more substantial.
It also tends to make these claims of money-grabbing less likely. 1 girl being immoral and bold enough to take on a major state university and its legal team by running a long con like this, complete with dates and times that can't be disproved? Okay, maybe.
3 or 4 girls with similar stories, also with the nerve to do it, and also with dates and times that align with their version of events? Getting in more rarefied air here; it only takes 1 instance of a plaintiff's story being impossible because there's a record of the accused being elsewhere when she claims the incident took place to disqualify her as a client or witness. And you can bet their legal teams' investigators are checking out every minute detail of their stories, because no attorney likes surprises.
6 to 8 girls willing to go through all this; all of them vetted and the veracity of their stories scrutinized by the lawyers and their investigators? Doesn't seem likely that they could all be hustling and have unimpeachable accounts.
Perhaps that's why there's been no settlement talk yet; the school is probably doing their own investigation to try and determine how strong each plaintiff's case is, and which, if any, can be disproved before even discussing settlements or trials.
Anybody read the lawsuit? I started last night and stopped where they state that "Paulk was given another 'faceless suspension' and by his own admission allowed to fully participate in team activities"...:huh: Can they just put any bull on piece of paper and not concern themselves with ACCURACY?
I don't see UT being able to settle this one. It's too far reaching. If they were thinking about settling, they would have stuck with their in house attorneys. I will be very disappointed if they do settle down the road.
A settlement agreement is an agreement among the parties. If one side doesn't want to settle, then it doesn't settle.
However, as I mentioned above, plaintiffs attorney are notoriously interested in the easy payday caused by an early settlement...if the money is right.
IMO, it is too early for the University to explore settlement. It wil be perceived as weak, and only drive up the price. I think it also looks bad from a public perception standpoint...almost like an admission of guilt.
Also IMO, this case most likely wil settle, but it is unlikely that it settles early.
I assume by your post you are not an attorney. You are wrong on all counts, but that's the way the uninformed usually see these things..
Anybody read the lawsuit? I started last night and stopped where they state that "Paulk was given another 'faceless suspension' and by his own admission allowed to fully participate in team activities"...:huh: Can they just put any bull on piece of paper and not concern themselves with ACCURACY?
There is wisdom in this post.A settlement agreement is an agreement among the parties. If one side doesn't want to settle, then it doesn't settle.
However, as I mentioned above, plaintiffs attorney are notoriously interested in the easy payday caused by an early settlement...if the money is right.
IMO, it is too early for the University to explore settlement. It wil be perceived as weak, and only drive up the price. I think it also looks bad from a public perception standpoint...almost like an admission of guilt.
Also IMO, this case most likely wil settle, but it is unlikely that it settles early.
