Let me ask one of the lawyers this question, say UT waits and AJ/Williams are found not guilty, then UT can offer a substantially lower settlement, and put in place guidelines to make sure a "culture" of rape is no longer available on campus, will that prevent any further lawsuits against the school?
I am going to go back to lurking the site and stop posting because...well I enjoy lurking much better. Been doing it since 2009. Before I go though I want to share some things Vol fans should be looking for as this case progresses.
1. The Answer to the Amended Complaint. It will be filed within the next month and It will answer every allegation in the complaint. Some Vol fans will point to it and shout "see this proves UT is right in all this". Just remember it is one side to the story. The Plaintiffs had their say, when UT files the answer that will be their say.
2. Motion for Summary Judgment. I saw on here someone say there is no way UT can win in this. I disagree. If UT prevails through MSJ that most definitely is a win because the judge would look at all the filings and determine that there is no question of fact to send to a jury. Only a question of law and UT complied with the law. The bar is very high to have a MSJ granted so if it is granted that is a slam dunk win. In 2014 Northwestern won a Title IX matter just this way. You probably didn't hear about it though because Peyton Manning wasn't mentioned in it.
3. Settlement. This case may very well settle. In fact I expect it to. There are many reasons why a case settles. Attorney fees and budgets rarely are the reason. One or both sides may not want the scrutiny of discovery. The insurance company (if one is involved) may force it. The risk of a maximum judgment from a jury is to great. The plaintiff may just want to move on. A settlement doesn't necessarily mean the defendant is liable. I know of a case that settled with both sides splitting court costs. I doubt the defendant felt like they had lost that case.
4. Attorneys. Both sides have good attorneys. I really admire Mr. Ramsey who represents UT. Mr. Smith for the plaintiffs is a very good attorney but he has lost jury trials and is not unbeatable.
UT took a hit in the public perception no question. There will be some out there that no matter how this ends will always point to it and say it happened. That is the society we live in.
GBO
2. Is that the one regarding the professor on campus allegedly sexual assaulting a student? That was indeed a weird one...in that one the school was found to have done everything correctly...the school won, then the professor filed his own title ix suit, don't recall what happened with that but he eventually resigned...it was a mess but not of this proportion.
Sorry if I'm thinking of the wrong case.
Does anyone know who is financing this lawsuit for the plaintiffs? Who is paying for their legal team?
Not sure that this lawsuit's alleged victims are saying that the UT football players are the only athletes involved. I think the suit is aiming more toward an entire university policy on sexual assault investigations and actions by UT administration.
CBJ took immediate action in several cases during his three years at UT...dismissed Paulk for striking his girlfriend even though she didn't want to press charges; suspended AJ Johnson and Michael Williams immediately after receiving the police report of the alleged rape; suspended Von Pearson until his sexual assault charges were dismissed; suspended Alexis Johnson until his assault and battery charges are final; dismissed Pig Howard for drugs. This in my mind is affirmative action by the head football coach. Unlike what happened at Penn State and FSU, in the Jameis Winston alleged rape investigation. As you know in the FSU case a similar Title IX lawsuit was filed by the alleged victim and the university settled out of court for a tidy sum of money.
UT is not going to "win" either way.
I don' know how others feel about his, however; I am 100% against suspending CBJ from any further coaching until this situation is resolved. Just as I am 100% against CBJ suspending players based on allegations. It appears we are having it both ways. A man is innocent until proven guilty, unless he is a UT football player. We need to be more consistent-otherwise what we say is not driven by a desire for justice, but rather some kind of fan boy crap. We need to take this to court-prove once and for all time, all the claims are 100% false.
That's true.
But for me, we've already lost public opinion and it's costing us money either way.
So really the only question is, how much is dignity worth?
If UT knows that they followed protocol and aren't responsible for any suffering, I'm with them as far as they want to take this.
One thing to consider is the number of plaintiffs; that makes potential awards so much more substantial.
It also tends to make these claims of money-grabbing less likely. 1 girl being immoral and bold enough to take on a major state university and its legal team by running a long con like this, complete with dates and times that can't be disproved? Okay, maybe.
3 or 4 girls with similar stories, also with the nerve to do it, and also with dates and times that align with their version of events? Getting in more rarefied air here; it only takes 1 instance of a plaintiff's story being impossible because there's a record of the accused being elsewhere when she claims the incident took place to disqualify her as a client or witness. And you can bet their legal teams' investigators are checking out every minute detail of their stories, because no attorney likes surprises.
6 to 8 girls willing to go through all this; all of them vetted and the veracity of their stories scrutinized by the lawyers and their investigators? Doesn't seem likely that they could all be hustling and have unimpeachable accounts.
Perhaps that's why there's been no settlement talk yet; the school is probably doing their own investigation to try and determine how strong each plaintiff's case is, and which, if any, can be disproved before even discussing settlements or trials.
for enough money these chicks will drop the charges and keep quiet---UT needs to find that number.
Bingo. 100% agree. We are way better off getting this to just go away than fight. Everyone's first reaction is to fight back but testosterone does not win these fights. We can't afford a protracted process for the health of the program.
I truly detest your school, everything about it, if a comet hits it during your spring game not one tear would be shed by me to give you perspective where I'm coming from in the rest of this. I do appreciate your perspective as a professional if you actually are, it's the a representing attorney would give, it is solid advice. I often have counseled people through the years to hire the best professionals you can and then take their advice. I suspect UT has insurance and at some point the professionals there will require settlement, I get it, that's what you chaps do on the regular and is standard process. However, if UT does not plan on turning this over as an insurance claim, I prefer scorched earth take no prisoners prevail in court and drag this out bankrupting the accusers and law firms devoting time to this matter. If it two decades so be it.I don't practice in that area of the law, but my suspicion is that there is an attorneys fee provision in the federal statute at issue (there usually is) that the plaintiffs' attorneys, if they prevail, are also awarded their fees and costs on top of any verdict for the plaintiffs.
I still think you need to disprove the Bowles comments if you can. That will be something you never get out from under without some sort of a fight back. It will be mentioned in every breath, every game, by every announcer. Gotta kill it if you can
