Shooting in El Paso

View attachment 216363
Here's a pic of some of those shooters. It was posted earluer, but none of you acknowledged it. How many white supremacist do you think are here? I mean, that's all your side cries anyway.

Remind me where I (or the other 3 libs in this Trump echo chamber) said every (or most) mass shirtings were done by white supremacists?
 
CURL: New York Times Proves Once And For All That It Takes Marching Orders From The Liberal Elite

times_2_0.jpg


The New York Times wrote a headline.

The liberal elite moaned and groaned and whined and whinnied.

The New York Times changed its headline.

If you were looking for proof — real, solid proof — that the once-great New York Times takes its marching orders from the liberal elite in the Democratic Party, look no further.

After two mass shootings within hours left 32 dead and 52 wounded, President Trump delivered a somber statement from the White House on Monday. He laid out several avenues as potential solutions, called for unity and bipartisanship, soothed Americans as the comforter-in-chief and loudly denounced racism and white supremacy.

"Together, we lock arms to shoulder the grief, we ask God in Heaven to ease the anguish of those who suffer, and we vow to act with urgent resolve," he said.

"In one voice, our nation must condemn racism, bigotry, and white supremacy. These sinister ideologies must be defeated. Hate has no place in America," he said.

"Now is the time to set destructive partisanship aside — so destructive — and find the courage to answer hatred with unity, devotion, and love," he said.

The New York Times captured the essence of the president's speech with a headline for its first print edition that read: "TRUMP URGES UNITY VS. RACISM." The headline carried no bias for either Left or Right, simply summing up the expansive message Trump had delivered.

But the Left went nuts — absolutely nuts. How dare The Times not bash Trump as a racist?!

Former Rep. Robert "Beto" O'Rourke, a candidate for the presidential nomination in 2020, found it "unbelievable" and said so as he rewteeted a post from Nate Silver, a former New York Times writer.


EBP7_IOXoAcfM8d





Sen. Cory Booker, another 2020 hopeful, wrote: "Lives literally depend on you doing better, NYT. Please do," as he retweeted the same Silver post.


"Hey, @nytimes — what happened to “The Truth Is Worth It?” Not the truth. Not worth it," wrote New York mayor and 2020 candidate Bill deBlasio.​

"That’s not what happened," said candidate Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand.​

And newcomer Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the Democratic socialist the Democratic National Committee chairman called "the future of the party," followed suit.​

"Let this front page serve as a reminder of how white supremacy is aided by - and often relies upon - the cowardice of mainstream institutions," she wrote on Twitter.

So (are you sitting down?) the New York Times CHANGED ITS HEADLINE.​

For its second edition, out was the clear and concise headline encapsulating the essence of Trump's comments. In was a new one blasting him as weak and spineless on guns. And forget all those calls for unity versus racism.​

"ASSAILING HATE BUT NOT GUNS" read the new headline.​

Silver praised the Times for making the change: "FWIW (certainly better to do this than not IMO) they changed their headline between the 1st and 2nd print edition," he wrote on Twitter.​

So there it is: Definitive proof that The New York Times takes its marching orders from the liberal elite in the Democratic Party.​

 
CURL: New York Times Proves Once And For All That It Takes Marching Orders From The Liberal Elite

times_2_0.jpg


The New York Times wrote a headline.

The liberal elite moaned and groaned and whined and whinnied.

The New York Times changed its headline.

If you were looking for proof — real, solid proof — that the once-great New York Times takes its marching orders from the liberal elite in the Democratic Party, look no further.

The same paper that for years hid the fact that millions of Jews were being slaughtered in Europe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
MSNBC’S Hayes: ‘Decent People’ Cannot Support Trump’s ‘Dark Sorcery of Racial Hatred’

Monday, MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes said President Donald Trump has “disqualified” himself from the support of decent people by using the “dark sorcery of racial hatred.”

In the wake of the El Paso mass shooting, Hayes said, “Even if there were no blood, it would still be vile. If there were no body count, no deaths to mourn, no grieving families, no young parents ripped apart by bullets while shielding their babies, even if none of that happened, it would still be an existential threat to the America we can and should be.”

MSNBC'S Hayes: 'Decent People' Cannot Support Trump's 'Dark Sorcery of Racial Hatred' | Breitbart
 
I don't know how else to make my point to you more clear.

YOU COMMITTED A LOGICAL FALLACY.

You are mischaracterizing the debate about firearms to a more easily attacked and defeated argument over pressure cookers and taxi cabs.

I did not create this strawman, I'm simply pointing out that what you perceive to be a equally valid argument, isn't.
The argument is about fear of inanimate objects. My point was there are many inanimate objects that can hurt or kill you in the hands of evil people. Someone can easily pick up a knife in a Walmart and slit your throat.

Guns have the potential to kill people and have other uses besides killing people
Pressure cookers have the potential to kill people and have other uses besides killing people
Taxis have the potential to kill people and have other uses besides killing people
Knives have the potential to kill people and have other uses besides killing people

If you want to argue the likelihood of being killed or injured by any of those then I can get on board with that but discounting it because you don't like the comparison, well, frankly that's lazy. Although I think if you compared death by drunk driving statistics, I venture to guess you'd most likely be killed by a drunk driver than in a mass shooting.

Just because you don't perceive it as a valid argument doesn't mean it's not valid. It is.
 
@NorthDallas40 you're a TX guy. Do people actually do this in TX?


While legal to do so I cannot remember the last time I saw an individual using long gun open carry. Pistol open carry is illegal. I’d say in living in DFW for 31 years I can count the times on one hand I’ve ever even seen it. I do not know when long gun open carry became legal or if it was always legal in Texas. We recently had legislation that allows CHL holders to open carry pistols now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst
Hmmm, so did this guy just go nuts and shoot the place up? Or, was he a responsible gun owner who actually has common sense?

I just wanna know if people walk in to Chick-fil-A with rifles strapped to their backs. Sure as hell would make me find another restaurant.
 
WATCH: UFC’s Kamaru Usman Says Fans Urging Him to ‘Kill’ Trump-Supporter Colby Covington

UFC champ Kamaru Usman says his fans hate Colby Covington so much, they are urging him to “kill” the welterweight.

“I have over thousands of messages on Instagram of people saying, ‘Bro, you gotta kill this dude,'” Usman told TMZ Sports. “It’s not, ‘beat him.’ It’s ‘Kill this guy. Kill him for us.'”

Usman claims that Covington is driving his fans into conniptions with his bellicose proclamations and also his full and vocal support of President Donald Trump and the Trump family.

“It not only rubs people the wrong way, it makes people wanna punch you in the face,” Usman added. “And, I’m talking women and children, grandmas! Not just fighters.”

“He calls himself ‘The People’s Champ,’ but you can’t be with the people because the people want to harm you! You have to walk around with security each and everywhere you go because they want to HARM you, not because they LOVE you.”

WATCH: UFC's Kamaru Usman Says Fans Urging Him to 'Kill' Trump-Supporter Colby Covington
 

Advertisement



Back
Top