Average SOS for Mullen while at MSU = 4.42
Average SOS for Butch while at Tenn = 5.07
Go on....
So youre saying if Franklin stayed at Vandy for 9 seasons he wouldnt win the East and gone to more than one BCS bowl?
How much is Sexton paying you to post this stuff?
Do you need a ranking of schedules to tell you playing the likes of LSU, Auburn, and A&M is equal to playing USC, Mizzou, and Vandy every year?
Dont tell me you actually believe this. You gotta be joking right?
Once again, youre saying playing LSU, Auburn, and A&M are equal to Vandy, Mizzou, and South Carolina.....
Are you denying this?
I'm telling you that STATISTICALLY Butch Jones had a more difficult schedule while at Tennessee than Mullen has had while at MSU. Hiring Mullen would be a downgrade, STATISTICALLY speaking. Are you denying the validity of statistics?
Thats not true.
Look at common opponents.
Both had Bama and UK so you can take that out of the equation.
Now look at the rest.
Auburn has been better than UGA
LSU has been better than Florida
Ole Miss has been better than Vandy
Texas A&M has been better than South Carolina
Arkansas and Mizzou have been up and down
Are you honestly saying that MSUs non common SEC opponents are equal to Tennessees?
You dont need a ranking system to answer the question either.
So you are denying the validity of statistics, correct? You are trying to look at this subjectively rather than objectively, which is silly. And by silly I mean downright absurd. "Well I feel like 'x' and 'y'" does not apply here. Sorry buttercup, but numbers speak for themselves. Mullen would be a garbage hire; quite literally a downgrade, and it would set us back another decade at least.
Im looking at constants. Which just so happen to make up 2/3s of Tennessee and States schedules every year. Take out of OOC games (because they arent constant and change every year) and Tennessees SOS gets easier and MSUs gets tougher. At the end of the day, 4 games every year cant be measured equally between the two schools.
I also dont look at OOC games because coaches in SEC get hired and fired based on SEC play at their respective schools.
You have to include 4 OOC games to make any kind of claim that their schedules are close instead of looking at the other 8 games.
At the end of the day, the fact that you say LSU, Auburn, and A&M are equal to USC, Vandy, and Mizzou is disturbingly insane.
The fact that you continue to think shows how little your football IQ and acumen really is.
To summarize:
The statistics that I intricately made up are far more important than anyone else's. And you have a low football IQ if you can't see this.
Im looking at constants. Which just so happen to make up 2/3s of Tennessee and States schedules every year. Take out of OOC games (because they arent constant and change every year) and Tennessees SOS gets easier and MSUs gets tougher. At the end of the day, 4 games every year cant be measured equally between the two schools.
I also dont look at OOC games because coaches in SEC get hired and fired based on SEC play at their respective schools.
You have to include 4 OOC games to make any kind of claim that their schedules are close instead of looking at the other 8 games.
At the end of the day, the fact that you say LSU, Auburn, and A&M are equal to USC, Vandy, and Mizzou is disturbingly insane.
The fact that you continue to think shows how little your football IQ and acumen really is.
If nothing else, I have to say I admire you sticking to your guns of willful ignorance. You're stubborn and I like it, even though you cannot refute the statistics and numbers I have presented to you. Bottomline is that Mullen is mediocre at best, and hiring him at Tennessee would be the coup de grâce
Yet you still have yet to answer a simple yes no question on whether you still think LSU, Auburn, and A&M are equal to Vandy, Mizzou, and USC.
Yet not one national analyst or media person agrees with that sentiment. Name one person of credibility that agrees with you.