Recruiting Forum Off Topic Thread III

[butchna]

And it’s ruined the small schools?

Let you commies run em for a quarter.

 

[butchna]

Let’s implement universal basic income!

If you weren’t already an anarchist, your honesty would liberate you. “You get a cardboard box! YOU get a cardboard box! ...”

 

[Smokey123]

Your new green deal would....

Your? Way off buddy

I thought republicans were for free markets? Just not when it’s against your entertainment I guess

 

[SLICKYINC]

Your? Way off buddy

I thought republicans were for free markets? Just not when it’s against your entertainment I guess

My entertainment at the moment is you. Dance

 

[Smokey123]

If you weren’t already an anarchist, your honesty would liberate you. “You get a cardboard box! YOU get a cardboard box! ...”

Swing and a miss

 

[Smokey123]

One percenter hippies! Helluva lobby!

Let’s implement socialism and take away from the 1%!!

 

[SweetasSoda]

Let’s implement socialism and take away from the 1%!!

Let's not.

 

[Smokey123]

Ahhh yes calling a free market capitalist republican a commie, socialist and liberal. You love to see it

 

[Smokey123]

Let's not.

Too bad some have already used socialists arguments against free markets. Ig socialism is only good for ones entertainment

 

[reVOLution33]

My lord! I am the furthest thing from a Democrat but everyone from all spectrums just stfu and move on to recruiting. You all have made your point but no one is going to make any ground. Just agree to disagree and move on.

 

[SweetasSoda]

Too bad some have already used socialists arguments against free markets. Ig socialism is only good for ones entertainment

No need to get political and have all the posts moved. It's been explained by several different people in several different ways why we think it is in the best interests of individuals who play college sports to be on scholarship instead of professional athletes.

 

[Smokey123]

No need to get political and have all the posts moved. It's been explained by several different people in several different ways why we think it is in the best interests of individuals who play college sports to be on scholarship instead of professional athletes.

I’m not the one who made it political...

You don’t get to decide what’s best for an individual

 

[butchna]

Your? Way off buddy

I thought republicans were for free markets? Just not when it’s against your entertainment I guess

You socialists want to kill the product which wrecks the market. Leaving YOU and your folk music as the only entertainment.

 

[SweetasSoda]

I’m not the one who made it political...

You don’t get to decide what’s best for an individual

You started with saying the individual was more important than the fan right? So you get to decide what is best for the individual?

 

[Smokey123]

You started with saying the individual was more important than the fan right? So you get to decide what is best for the individual?

No... the individual is deciding what’s best for the individual.... society or an org should not be the one deciding

 

[SweetasSoda]

No... the individual is deciding what’s best for the individual.... society or an org should not be the one deciding

That's anarchy.

 

[Smokey123]

You socialists want to kill the product which wrecks the market. Leaving YOU and your folk music as the only entertainment.

Says the one who wants to control what individuals do and wants everything fair

 

[Smokey123]

That's anarchy.

No it’s not lol

 

[SweetasSoda]

No it’s not lol

Yes, the absolute freedom of the individual is anarchy. There would not be society or an organization deciding what is best.... I'm sure that's not what you mean. The other end of the spectrum where there is only gain by the organization with exploitation of the athlete is not what we're suggesting. So then it boils down to what is really best for the athletes. We think what the athletes are getting is compensation enough. You don't. That's fine.

 

[Smokey123]

Yes, the absolute freedom of the individual is anarchy. There would not be society or an organization deciding what is best.... I'm sure that's not what you mean. The other end of the spectrum where there is only gain by the organization with exploitation of the athlete is not what we're suggesting. So then it boils down to what is really best for the athletes. We think what the athletes are getting is compensation enough. You don't. That's fine.

Anarchy is no authority. That’s not what I called for

 

[butchna]

Says the one who wants to control what individuals do and wants everything fair

You don’t want everything fair? Cool. Athletes play for free...no scholarships.

 

[SweetasSoda]

Anarchy is no authority. That’s not what I called for

Oh, thought you said society or an organization should not decide.

 

[butchna]

Anarchy is no authority. That’s not what I called for

Yes you didn’t.

 

[Smokey123]

Oh, thought you said society or an organization should not decide.

Correct. That doesn’t mean no authority. Who’s currently deciding what’s best for you?

 

[Smokey123]

You don’t want everything fair? Cool. Athletes play for free...no scholarships.

Cool then we can add free markets and school can decide free school or 500k a year. Glad we agree