Those are reasons for your optimism based on nothing more than opinions and assumptions.
Logic is based on clear reasoning rather than opinions or assumptions.
Logic is based on wins and losses.
Logic dictates that since Alabama, Georgia, Florida, SC, Mizzou, and Vanderbilt have multiple game winning streaks over the Vols that they will win again this season. Not because the Vols aren’t making progress but rather because their programs are currently in a better spot than UT’s.
It’s logic to think that Miss State will beat the Vols this season because they have been a better program in recent years.
UT rarely loses to Kentucky so it’s logic to believe that UT will beat them again this season.
That’s not going to change until it’s proved or disproved on the football field.
Can the Vols overcome some of these programs this year based upon the progress they have made this off season? We are all hoping they do.
That’s the reason they play the games and we watch them.
Logic consists of inductive and deductive arguments. Since it is impossible to make a deductive argument for the future record of a football team, an inductive argument is necessary.
You also cannot deduce from last year’s results how this team will fair. So, it appears we are both in the inductive argument game here. However, my argument is not predominantly opinions, but even when they are they are strong, and ones which I would say are cogent.
Multiple recruiting classes of Pruitts players. - not an opinion.
A staff full of highly respected teachers and past winners. - not an opinion the staff has 16 Nattys combined.
2nd year of consistency in the weight room. - not an opinion.
2nd year of HC duties for Pruitt. Not an opinion.
A big time upgrade at OC. - an opinion, but not one that anybody is disagreeing with.
One of the most experienced QBs in CFB. - not an opinion.
Returning almost all of our production on offense which has shown to lead to much improved results on the field. - not an opinion.
The much improved confidence of every player and person surrounding the program is visible and audible. - sure, an opinion, but still supportive of an inductive argument.
There are little arguments behind each of those statements which I could very well support in manner I think would be strong and convincing, but please, don’t make me do all that here. Lol