Recruiting Forum Football Talk IX

They did it bc Bruce didn’t give them any other options with the timing, which was his goal.
If that's the case why a 5 year contract after the family screwed you ? They had to be planning that whole scenario. At the very most would have been 1 to 3 years.
 
If that's the case why a 5 year contract after the family screwed you ? They had to be planning that whole scenario. At the very most would have been 1 to 3 years.

Idk the answer to that. Besides that nobody gets a 1 year contract.

I’m only telling you that this has been a known in the coaching world that Bruce wanted to strong arm AUB into giving his kid the main gig.

Maybe Bruce won enough to make it easy for them to say yes.
 
Giving Auburn Bama, Georgia, and LSU would have been nuts lol.

You had to give them Vandy. There was no other option if you're keeping Georgia and Bama.
I would have given them Florida as the third game. But I guess I’m thinking of historical rivalries and not “what’s fair”.
 
Someone quoted a booster on South Carolina's 247 board claiming that Beamer wanted to hire a new OL coach in the offseason, but did not because the OL room threatened to transfer. Fans are saying he should have let them transfer because they are all bums, but the OL would have been worse if they had, because you can't attract 5 better in the portal at South Carolina. I don't care who you hire.
Beamer was a hired because others turned SC down. Other coaches turned SC down because it was a bargain basement football budget for a SEC team. Beamer has actually done better than I imaged he would with his resources.
 
I agree. It's like a middle school level of juvenile humor. The kind of people who enjoy it seem to be the same people who make fart noises with their armpits and giggle about it. I just don't get how people like stuff like that.
triple-lindy-dive-rodney-dangerfield-stretching-s2bw2fogxbgjnvqr.gif
Laugh very time I see this..........but I get your point.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top