Z06VolinWV
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2009
- Messages
- 5,612
- Likes
- 13,557
This, they're going to push those guys out, and there isn't new blood to bring in.
I really like what Tom Banks is doing with what he’s got right now.
that game was stacked against us with no consistent drives in our part and a string Florida rush, which was my biggest concern, but I can see him doing really well when things are clocking
USC alreadyThere will inevitably be coaching changes in college football this season. There always are. Hoping that we can get every quality OL we can from the portal first and foremost then hopefully DBs and LBs.
And where's the hope that he's going to get these players coming from? He's never recruited at a high level. Recruiting sucks right now, probably will for a couple years, the admin has invited the law into our house so to speak, and told on themselves, and Heupel doesn't have any relationships with a lot of these top guys. There's just nothing for me to hang my hat on that says hey, they're going to figure it out71 scholarship players, rebuild of epic proportions , unreal expectations, and his offense works. Players we have are not executing. Penalties, overthrows, and drops. Give us half of each of those back we are 3-1 and just lost a close one to Florida in their house.
And where's the hope that he's going to get these players coming from? He's never recruited at a high level. Recruiting sucks right now, probably will for a couple years, the admin has invited the law into our house so to speak, and told on themselves, and Heupel doesn't have any relationships with a lot of these top guys. There's just nothing for me to hang my hat on that says hey, they're going to figure it out
They're banking a lot on the TV money to hold them over until they can build a new base imo.Spreadsheet decision-making. It's all about revenue. If you're going to spreadsheet a decision, you'd better do it when the timing is right or you have a high probability of upgrading what you lose.
A lot of these long-time donors support UT in other areas, like facilities improvements, endowments and academics. Many were multi-sport donors that supported UT teams when they weren't good-- and did so for generations.
And where's the hope that he's going to get these players coming from? He's never recruited at a high level. Recruiting sucks right now, probably will for a couple years, the admin has invited the law into our house so to speak, and told on themselves, and Heupel doesn't have any relationships with a lot of these top guys. There's just nothing for me to hang my hat on that says hey, they're going to figure it out
They are going to lose long-time donors who have remained loyal to UT through good times and bad-- a lot of bad. Hoping to churn the donor base in their favor is one thing-- pushing all their chips in on it is a big risk.
Eh, not a fan of transfers. There's a reason they're in the portal. Juco's are a better option imo.
I think the data they're putting into those spreadsheets may be flawed. They were creative when the basketball ticket wasn't sought after and it was pretty dang successful. I figured something similar might work for football but they decided to throw caution to the wind and try and hit the larger donors more. I don't disagree with the overall plan but I'm questioning the timing. You raise prices when demand is high. Demand is anything but high.Spreadsheet decision-making. It's all about revenue. If you're going to spreadsheet a decision, you'd better do it when the timing is right or you have a high probability of upgrading what you lose.
A lot of these long-time donors support UT in other areas, like facilities improvements, endowments and academics. Many were multi-sport donors that supported UT teams when they weren't good-- and did so for generations.
Nobody should be singing his praises besides what he has accomplished with Tony and the students….. I feel better about the university now than I have in years…. I feel they are starting to move in the same direction.Talking about in the future.
Right now, means nothing to me. Sorry to say but it is what it is. Come back in a few years and ask me how I feel.
9 months of work doesn’t make up for the last 15 years. Again, it sucks to say that because it isn’t his fault, but he took the job and yes so far he has done a great job, but I’m not gonna sing his praises this soon.
But the penalties were mostly related to the fast pace offense. Things like false starts, illegal procedures, holding, etc NOT targeting, late hits, unsportsmanlike conduct, etc. if we could stop that stupid crap, we could overcome the stuff that’s related to going fast.Go look at the penalty statistics from Heupel’s time at UCF. It’s a pattern.
I don’t care what happens in practice with Bailey. And he wasn’t behind Maurer. That’s completely false.
Maurer was #4. The coaches told him that, which escalated his frustration and expedited his departure. Coaches wanted Milton #1 because of his upside, with Hooker and Bailey as backups. Hooker's skillset is more desirable to this staff and considered more favorable for this offense.
Bailey's a high character kid who's continuing to work hard and keep his mouth shut. He's not going to play much this year, and the situation is going to resolve itself. But to say he's terrible or always the least accurate in practice just isn't true. None of them are consistent in practice-- and haven't been.
I’m glad you’re saying this because everyone assumes I am being too pessimistic when I bring it up.They are going to lose long-time donors who have remained loyal to UT through good times and bad-- a lot of bad. Hoping to churn the donor base in their favor is one thing-- pushing all their chips in on it is a big risk.