wmcovol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2012
- Messages
- 17,470
- Likes
- 30,682
my grandmother used to say : so and so has more money than Croesus.....ain't heard that in a while.
It's illegal to condition an NIL to committing to or remaining at a certain school, so the second part about them not entering the Portal is either blatantly illegal or untrue. More likely it's not true, it seems more like an envious sour grapes fantasy by an OU fan.
Most of the SEC schools are not in the same ball part as Texas and Texas A M with regard to resources to buy players.
Texas has the most money in the SEC in their endowment and Texas A M the second most. It's not even close. The same families that give to the endowment can easily give to the charities running the NIL.
Be prepared to always be behind those schools for talent.
Approximate endowment:
Texas 30.9 B
Texas AM 13.59 B
Florida 1.85 B
Tenn and most others come in around 1.2 - 1.5 B
Notre Dame, Standford, Duke, Southern Cal also way up there.
I am going to say that this is exactly what A M did.
Bama actually has a higher average per recruit. A&M is only ahead cause they've signed more. Ohio st is right there with them they just haven't signed as manyThere is a reason that A M had the number 1 recruiting class above Alabama this year. Alabama racks it in on tv games etc. but their NIL donors can match up with us - but not the Texas schools.
Yes, but does your program want to go all in? That is going to be the debate of college administrators whose main focus is education. Some will consider pushing athletics out to a farm league and concentrating their resources on education.Am I supposed to be upset with A&M?
Because I’m not, I’m actually really jealous!
Am I in the minority here?
I don’t like the whole “NIL” deal, but if we’re gonna do it, I would want my program going all in!
GBO!!
FBI wiretaps had Creighton paying $100,000 for a basketball player. That's Creighton. And basketball.My only skepticism would be the dollar amount. But honestly, I have no clue what the players are getting paid; just seems like $1 - 1.2 mil average is pretty high, but who knows.
The one interesting angle here --- with multi-year deals, they could end up being stuck with some of the busts. Normally these top programs try to push out some of the busts, but if they are getting paid, they may not be so eager to leave.
FBI wiretaps had an asst coach taking 6,000 dollars in undercover money. It was a sports agent who told his dad he could get his son 100k if going to Creighton. (according to his dad). The son didnt sign with Creighton and never got a penny from Creighton. I think he signed with Louisville? And then there's a possibility his dad was trying to get a little money? He also said he was told his son could 150k to go to AZ St.FBI wiretaps had Creighton paying $100,000 for a basketball player. That's Creighton. And basketball.
You are correctFBI wiretaps had an asst coach taking 6,000 dollars in undercover money. It was a sports agent who told his dad he could get his son 100k if going to Creighton. (according to his dad). The son didnt sign with Creighton and never got a penny from Creighton. I think he signed with Louisville? And then there's a possibility his dad was trying to get a little money? He also said he was told his son could 150k to go to AZ St.
What are the companies offering the 250K? Surely you have the names?Well, those two schools' not for profit NIL programs are offering $250,000 + deals to 10 linemen. Get back to me when we start doing that would you. With our Petro's and Calhoun's bbq - and - the Sunsphere resources.
The point is we don't have a rich and extensive donor base to compete with some of these schools. Texas and Texas A and M were the most blatant examples this past recruiting cycle. Notre Dame, Ohio State, Southern Cal may copy A and M's formula next year.
I know this is not how it was designed or how it was supposed to work - but this is how it is currently working.