rickyyrs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 5,160
- Likes
- 2,011
I’m for expanded playoffs but there should be a couple wildcard slots.The problem is that 'the best 4' is determined by a committee that wants to make money.
Pitt vs Michigan.
Winner gets Bama
Baylor plays Utah.
Winner gets Cincinnati.
Winners play for the NC.
A true NC, determined by conference winners, not subjective picks.
Don't know that I'd quite say they got exposed...Bama has a better QB but UGA could easily put it to Bama in the championship game.And exactly who do you believe is better than them? We already know the committee doesn't do the "deserves" to be there in regards to winning your conference. Georgia got exposed but there's no way I'm putting ND or Baylor in there.
Wouldn't make any sense to drop Cincinnati because UGA lost. Doesn't mean they won't of course
I'm disappointed that Tennessee again will get robbed of a chance to be in the playoffs...
Tennessee beat Kentucky who beat LSU who beat Texas A&M who beat Alabama who also beat Georgia...
Tennessee beat Bowling Green who beat Minnesota who beat Purdue who beat Michigan State who beat Michigan...
Tennessee is clearly better than 3 of the 4 teams in the playoffs this year...
Ditto, keep saying that myself. They keep drinking that dumb SEC SEC koolaid. To be honest it’s stupid to shout SEC at football games . Yes the SEC is the best conference in football everybody already knows that. But to pull for Ala and Ga when your a UT is just stupid . Just promoting their recruiting . STOP DRINKING the SEC chant koolaid.12-1 UGA had their shot to make the playoff and got ran over in what should have been them losing their chance. Y’all need to get off this “SEC, SEC, SEC” crap cause all it does is help Bama and UGA and hurt us in recruiting the top players
I think your opinion that Bama has a "poor" O-line is probably not shared by anyone who knows something about football. It's also not supported by reality:Defense looked pretty weak against a team that had a poor OL. I'd say that's exposed.
I think your opinion that Bama has a "poor" O-line is probably not shared by anyone who knows something about football. It's also not supported by reality:
2021 College Football Team Total Offense Stats | ESPN
They have the sixth-ranked offense in D-I. They're averaging 496 yards and 42 points per game, along with 148 rushing yards per game. Those things tend not to happen with a "poor" O-line.
Their is Alabama then their is the rest of the whole country. They have boat raced the SEC pretty much the last 12 yrs . Yeah they have had a couple of off days where a team plays them close but overall they have mastered the art of destroying your secondary. You want to beat Alabama you better have 2 lock down corners or be able to run the ball for 250 plus yards .Bama's offensive output has masked some major issues on the offensive line. The fact that they've been rotating guys all year should tell you something. Despite how well Young has played, and despite his mobility, Bama is 106th in the country in sacks allowed. Only LSU and Tennessee are worse in the conference. Bama is tied for 115th in tackles for loss allowed and dead last in the SEC.
Young's output with the line he's had in front of him should further reinforce the obvious conclusion that he'll win the Heisman. And if Bama gets competent o-line play next year, the country should be very afraid.