Pizza time?

#701
#701
volfanhill said:
Maybe Acosta didn’t think he could get a conviction? Nothing Acosta did or did not do is new. You are jumping on the fire his ass bandwagon, which is the lazy approach, when you have no clue what circumstances led him to make the deal.
Click to expand...
The pedogate people should definitely be asking for his head. , We the people didn't get justice, the victims didn't get justice. There was no justice and in fact his actions hindered Justice being served, not only for Epstein but all of his co-conspirators and people that engaged in those horrific acts. I will put him down as a POS.
@hog88 never liked a government official or lawyer until now. Now all the crap they do is hunky dory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BowlBrother85
#703
#703
Mick said:
The pedogate people should definitely be asking for his head. , We the people didn't get justice, the victims didn't get justice. There was no justice and in fact his actions hindered Justice being served, not only for Epstein but all of his co-conspirators and people that engaged in those horrific acts. I will put him down as a POS.
@hog88 never liked a government official or lawyer until now. Now all the crap they do is hunkey dorey.
Click to expand...
hog is not saying he likes this guy. He's stating hold your horses until all the facts are out but you guys don't know how to do that which was more than proven with all your witch hunting accusations on Trump based on anonymous sourcing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush, tennvols77 and TN-POSSUM
#706
#706
Mick said:
The pedogate people should definitely be asking for his head. , We the people didn't get justice, the victims didn't get justice. There was no justice and in fact his actions hindered Justice being served, not only for Epstein but all of his co-conspirators and people that engaged in those horrific acts. I will put him down as a POS.
@hog88 never liked a government official or lawyer until now. Now all the crap they do is hunky dory.
Click to expand...
You are being emotional. You have no clue what evidence Acosta has, how reliable the witnesses were, and a whole host of other crap. If Acosta did give him this sweet heart deal for any other reasons then he needs to go. Maybe disbarred. But you, nor I, really no ****. And I think it’s even more ridiculous that this news about Acosta has been out forever. It’s not until it’s politically convenient for some of you to demand he resign. Like I told LG yesterday, excuse me if I don’t find your sudden outrage as suspect do to political affiliation. Unless of course you can point me in the direction of your outrage two weeks ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
#707
#707
BowlBrother85 said:
There could be an innocent explanation for it but the public hasn't heard it from Acosta yet, and I think he should explain himself.
Click to expand...
He publicly stated that the NY prosecutors have new evidence and witnesses he didn’t have access to.
 
#708
#708
volfanhill said:
You are being emotional. You have no clue what evidence Acosta has, how reliable the witnesses were, and a whole host of other crap. If Acosta did give him this sweet heart deal for any other reasons then he needs to go. Maybe disbarred. But you, nor I, really no ****. And I think it’s even more ridiculous that this news about Acosta has been out forever. It’s not until it’s politically convenient for some of you to demand he resign. Like I told LG yesterday, excuse me if I don’t find your sudden outrage as suspect do to political affiliation. Unless of course you can point me in the direction of your outrage two weeks ago.
Click to expand...
It's been brought up before but it was nothing to start a thread over and complain about non stop. It was probably covered in the swamp creature thread and Trump's Cabinet thread possibly even Q and pizzagate. It's not sudden outrage contrary to what you want to claim about someone else.
 
#709
#709
So the transition team is saying Acosta was questioned about the Epstein deal and he stated it was over his pay grade and Epstein belonged to intelligence.

Acosta hiring raises a backlash now that brings out what transpired in Florida back then?

Documents in the public now showing Epstein cooperating with FBI at that time.

Who ran the FBI at that time? High profile case with high profile involvements, nobody down the food chain would have been decision authorized on anything to do with it.

DOJ oversight? Barr recused on Florida case but not current New York case. Who's daughter is a listed prosecutor?

Who's names are all over flight logs from Epstein's planes that are in the public? Logs cover 1999-2006.

Current indictment covers 2000-2005 timeframe and is a trafficking charge. Will evidence found at NY home expand that timeframe? If so, trafficking charge means more flight logs for that time expansion.

This has the potential to become huge and may end up reshaping the whole political landscape.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77, hjeagle1vol and ajvol01
#710
#710
Mick said:
It's been brought up before but it was nothing to start a thread over and complain about non stop. It was probably covered in the swamp creature thread and Trump's Cabinet thread possibly even Q and pizzagate. It's not sudden outrage contrary to what you want to claim about someone else.
Click to expand...
Point me to where someone called for his head. I mean I brought it up in a thread but didn’t call for his head. Nothing new has come out to change anyone’s mind regarding he being forced to resign. Either you didn’t care enough then, which means you have no new reason to care now, or you are using your faux outrage for political reasons. It’s not complicated. Lastly none of us know why he made the deal he made. He did say today the NY prosecutors have new evidence and testimony he did not have access too. If true seems pretty important.
 
  • Like
Reactions: red butler and tennvols77
#711
#711
Mick said:
It's been brought up before but it was nothing to start a thread over and complain about non stop. It was probably covered in the swamp creature thread and Trump's Cabinet thread possibly even Q and pizzagate. It's not sudden outrage contrary to what you want to claim about someone else.
Click to expand...

Wasn't it the Q folk suggesting that Mueller and Trump were working to bring down the global pedo cabal? Why all of the sudden has this idea been discarded, and Mueller is supposedly part of the cover up?
 
#712
#712
Mick said:
The pedogate people should definitely be asking for his head. , We the people didn't get justice, the victims didn't get justice. There was no justice and in fact his actions hindered Justice being served, not only for Epstein but all of his co-conspirators and people that engaged in those horrific acts. I will put him down as a POS.
@hog88 never liked a government official or lawyer until now. Now all the crap they do is hunky dory.
Click to expand...

You couldn’t be more wrong, I have no problem throwing Acosta under the bus and running over him a few times. I just think there are more that deserves the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Burger and Mick
#713
#713
DynaLo said:
So the transition team is saying Acosta was questioned about the Epstein deal and he stated it was over his pay grade and Epstein belonged to intelligence.

Acosta hiring raises a backlash now that brings out what transpired in Florida back then?

Documents in the public now showing Epstein cooperating with FBI at that time.

Who ran the FBI at that time? High profile case with high profile involvements, nobody down the food chain would have been decision authorized on anything to do with it.

DOJ oversight? Barr recused on Florida case but not current New York case. Who's daughter is a listed prosecutor?

Who's names are all over flight logs from Epstein's planes that are in the public? Logs cover 1999-2006.

Current indictment covers 2000-2005 timeframe and is a trafficking charge. Will evidence found at NY home expand that timeframe? If so, trafficking charge means more flight logs for that time expansion.

This has the potential to become huge and may end up reshaping the whole political landscape.
Click to expand...
I doubt it. But it is fun to imagine the whole political landscape crumbling down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
#714
#714
I expect Acosta to stay right where he is, at least until he gets called in somewhere to testify under oath about what really happened in Florida concerning the plea deal.
 
#715
#715
volfanhill said:
Point me to where someone called for his head. I mean I brought it up in a thread but didn’t call for his head. Nothing new has come out to change anyone’s mind regarding he being forced to resign. Either you didn’t care enough then, which means you have no new reason to care now, or you are using your faux outrage for political reasons. It’s not complicated. Lastly none of us know why he made the deal he made. He did say today the NY prosecutors have new evidence and testimony he did not have access too. If true seems pretty important.
Click to expand...
Acosta stepped in and quit looking and stopped pursuing the case. That too has been discussed. And when "new evidence" comes to light about Acosta, then people need to adjust their thought about that person and in doing so people start talking about the situation. There are many that thought he didn't even deserve his position, that was dismissed as TDS or anti Trump libturd nonsense by many posters on here. And here you sit saying it's manufactured outrage all over again.
 
#716
#716
Mick said:
Acosta stepped in and quit looking and stopped pursuing the case. That too has been discussed. And when "new evidence" comes to light about Acosta, then people need to adjust their thought about that person and in doing so people start talking about the situation. There are many that thought he didn't even deserve his position, that was dismissed as TDS or anti Trump libturd nonsense by many posters on here. And here you sit saying it's manufactured outrage all over again.
Click to expand...
His qualifications as Labor Secretary are not pertinent to this discussion. And if you weren’t outraged two weeks ago you shouldn’t be now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
#717
#717
Still don’t know much about the case but the Feds declining prosecution in the event of somebody being prosecuted in State court isn’t unheard of. It’s actually very common. Federal prosecutors have way more discretion to decline a case. It happens hundreds of times per day in every USA’s office, depending on how you look at it.

I’ve asked for one of these declination letters, once, very early in my career, when I was pleading someone who had been approached by the FBI. I was told that the USA’s office in my jurisdiction will not provide them, as a matter of policy, in cases such as this, where they’re not anticipating using the individual as a witness.

I also had a number of state prosecutors drag their feet on resolving charges that might go Fed because they said it caused problems for the AUSAs if they pleaded somebody before a federal indictment.
 
#719
#719
volfanhill said:
His qualifications as Labor Secretary are not pertinent to this discussion. And if you weren’t outraged two weeks ago you shouldn’t be now.
Click to expand...

That's not how it works unless you're obsessive compulsive. People have this amazing ability to put thing to the side and not dwell on things that are not at the forefront of their lives but when the issue arises we often revert to the same understanding we previously developed. Just because you didn't see it because people weren't talking about doesn't mean people didn't already have opinions and questions regarding this man.
 
#721
#721
volfanhill said:
His qualifications as Labor Secretary are not pertinent to this discussion. And if you weren’t outraged two weeks ago you shouldn’t be now.
Click to expand...

Why should someone be disqualified from expressing outrage? Many people knew less two weeks ago than they do now. It's isn't stopping anyone from expressing it towards Epstein's alleged deeds. He was convicted of one singular charge. Nobody is assuming the other 36 girls were lying, or are they?

I think the fact that the only attempt at prosecution was that singular charge, and the fact that he was allowed to leave incarceration to conduct business seems like the sweetest of sweetheart deals. Yet, no room for outrage?
 
#722
#722
Mick said:
That's not how it works unless you're obsessive compulsive. People have this amazing ability to put thing to the side and not dwell on things that are not at the forefront of their lives but when the issue arises we often revert to the same understanding we previously developed. Just because you didn't see it because people weren't talking about doesn't mean people didn't already have opinions and questions regarding this man.
Click to expand...
Sure if you are uninformed. Or if something new about him came out. Otherwise it’s grandstanding. Your motives are apparent. Hell LG was already spinning his conspiracy theory that clearly this meant Trump influenced Acosta to give Epstein a sweet heart deal to avoid him being revealed as a kiddie didler. And in exchange Acosta was given Labor and you can expect Trump to pardon Epstein in a quid pro quo agreement.
 
#724
#724
Stew Cook said:
Why should someone be disqualified from expressing outrage? Many people knew less two weeks ago than they do now. It's isn't stopping anyone from expressing it towards Epstein's alleged deeds. He was convicted of one singular charge. Nobody is assuming the other 36 girls were lying, or are they?

I think the fact that the only attempt at prosecution was that singular charge, and the fact that he was allowed to leave incarceration to conduct business seems like the sweetest of sweetheart deals. Yet, no room for outrage?
Click to expand...

If you search Mick’s post history for references to Acosta, his first post about it was 18+ months ago so I think he’s good.
 
#725
#725
volfanhill said:
His qualifications as Labor Secretary are not pertinent to this discussion. And if you weren’t outraged two weeks ago you shouldn’t be now.
Click to expand...
You don't see how the new charges brought against Epstein this week have changed the perception of Epstein's 13 month jail sentence in 2008? Come on, man.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top