DC_Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2008
- Messages
- 22,878
- Likes
- 43,328
You said it in a much more clear and concise way than I have. Yes, this is it in a nutshell. Thank you.Essentially 36 some odd girls alleging sexual abuse were told to pound sand, while Acosta proceeded with a single complaint. No follow up, and the deal prevented the other cases from being prosecuted.
I find the part about not being able to pursue other cases troubling. I didn’t catch that until just a moment ago. I may have been way off base. Even if you have a loser of a case I don’t see why you wouldn’t just walk away and try to fight another day.You said it in a much more clear and concise way than I have. Yes, this is it in a nutshell.
I find the part about not being able to pursue other cases troubling. I didn’t catch that until just a moment ago. I may have been way off base. Even if you have a loser of a case I don’t see why you wouldn’t just walk away and try to fight another day.
...
On Twitter, Mr. Acosta said Tuesday: “With the evidence available more than a decade ago, federal prosecutors insisted that Epstein go to jail, register as a sex offender and put the world on notice that he was a sexual predator.” He said he supported the fresh effort by prosecutors to “more fully bring him to justice” based on new evidence and testimony.
“The crimes committed by Epstein are horrific, and I am pleased that NY prosecutors are moving forward with a case based on new evidence,” he wrote.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) said on Twitter late Monday night that Mr. Acosta must step down because of what she called “an unconscionable agreement” with Mr. Epstein. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) also called for the secretary’s resignation, saying on the Senate floor Tuesday that “if he refuses to resign, President Trump should fire him.”
A judge ruled in February that federal prosecutors overseeing the Epstein case—including Mr. Acosta—violated the law by concealing from his underage alleged victims the existence of a plea deal that shielded the politically connected Florida financier from federal charges.
In response to questions from reporters Tuesday at the White House, Mr. Trump said Mr. Acosta has been a “really great secretary of labor. The rest of it we’ll have to look at it very carefully.”
...
That’s a leap I haven’t seen many people make (Mueller blackmail operation).An accusation has been made that Epstein was working with Mueller who was blackmailing those implicated. No idea if true but knowing what I know now about Mueller, I don't put it past him.
You sure like to generalize and lump people into a single group-think opinion, huh?So, you Q folk no longer believe Mueller and Trump are working together to bring down the global pedo ring?
I said I have no problem with people calling him out for it. Hell be pissed about it. But that’s not the primary reason people are calling for his ass. At least not as how I have read things. They are pissed about the deal itself.
Now as far the deal goes, what would you do as a prosecutor, if you knew this guy was child raping scum, but also strongly believed your case was going to get blown out of the water by this particular defendants extremely high priced legal team? Would you go present a loser. Guy walks. Nothing. Or would you negotiate a deal of some sort. Now his lawyers know your case is **** so they are going to resist any deal offered. It’s going to have to be a pretty sweet one to get him to agree. And poof here we are. Hopefully NY has this guy by the sack.
Dude - you’re acting like Acosta did something worse than Epstein is accused of - you must CHILL!Which post was that? I have looked back through and don't see it.
I do sound like broken record on here sometimes (like ajvol01 says) because frankly, some of you guys go out of your way to ignore the main point, so it has to be repeated over and over to drive it home.
Let's try ALL CAPS this time and once more, with feeling...
EVEN IF ACOSTA WAS JUST ACTING ON INSTRUCTIONS, THAT DOES NOT EXPLAIN WHY ACOSTA (OR SOMEONE) DIDN'T EXPLAIN THE PLEA AGREEMENT TO EPSTEIN'S ALLEGED VICTIMS BEFORE PRESENTING IT TO THE PRESIDING JUDGE OF THE CASE.
You don’t?More than 2,300 pedophiles arrested across the US | Daily Mail Online
Sessions apparently has some special hatred of Pedos.
From what I’ve read it seems the Southern District of Florida can’t pursue other cases. That’s why this was filed in SDNY if the information is accurate.I find the part about not being able to pursue other cases troubling. I didn’t catch that until just a moment ago. I may have been way off base. Even if you have a loser of a case I don’t see why you wouldn’t just walk away and try to fight another day.
I'm going with people told Acosta there's going to be a plea deal and to back off.Dude - you’re acting like Acosta did something worse than Epstein is accused of - you must CHILL!
There’s no time machine to change what happened with the plea deal. Have you asked yourself why the narrative / push to remove Acosta now?
What does Acosta know and who would that knowledge negatively affect?
I want to see how this plays out. Trump will fire him if / when necessary.
You sure like to generalize and lump people into a single group-think opinion, huh?
Q folk?
What group does that put you in?
Sheep folk? Asleep folk?
So you read the Mueller/Trump idea somewhere and so all Q observers must believe this?
Ridiculous.
What I read today suggested that his lawyers are calling bs and saying he’s good here bc of the agreement. Now obviously they are his lawyers but I doubt he’s got bad ones.From what I’ve read it seems the Southern District of Florida can’t pursue other cases. That’s why this was filed in SDNY if the information is accurate.
Idk to be honest.What I read today suggested that his lawyers are calling bs and saying he’s good here bc of the agreement. Now obviously they are his lawyers but I doubt he’s got bad ones.
