warrior
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2008
- Messages
- 2,302
- Likes
- 499
I have a question that I hope someone may have insight into. Maybe I'm "misremembering", but early in this process, weren't reports that part of what made Gruden possible, was that PM was onboard for some marketing/fundraising to persuade or sweeten the pot for some entity so that it could happen?
If this is the case, then why all the reports now that PM was onboard with the Schiano hire?
What happened that made this deal go so far south as far as Peyton is concerned?
I understand your frustrations completely. Ill address this once because I dont want this to spiral and distract us. Whats done is done.
This has gone completely sideways on us. In the beginning, the belief was, everything was kosher and going to planned. A few, took it on their own accord to get in contact with some candidates they had a relationship with and for the most part, it seemed like everyone was ok with this.
Well, the only way I can rationalize what Im about to say (and excuse me for being blunt is) someone or some people got *utt hurt that this happened without their blessing and didnt invite them to the party, so to speak.
Im not going to go into great detail what happened next because I dont have enough time... I could write a book on it. The short story is, we were all taken off guard and surprised. The reason Bev didnt sign off is because Bev wasnt even in the loupe. It was rushed in order to try and get it done quickly, so there could be no objections.
Thankfully, someone close to Currie did, in fact, leak what was happening. If it werent for him/ her, this deal would have been done and Schiano would have been trotted out to EVERYONES surprise.
So there you have it. I know this doesnt come as a surprise. Of course, like you said, this is purely from my perspective. Im not going to comment on it anymore. We have more important things to focus our energy on, but we have won every battle since this all went down.
I have a question that I hope someone may have insight into. Maybe I'm "misremembering", but early in this process, weren't reports that part of what made Gruden possible, was that PM was onboard for some marketing/fundraising to persuade or sweeten the pot for some entity so that it could happen?
If this is the case, then why all the reports now that PM was onboard with the Schiano hire?
What happened that made this deal go so far south as far as Peyton is concerned?
This may not make sense, or maybe it's already been discussed, but hear me out.
The reason tee hasn't gotten a call would line up with Gruden coming and tee being oc, I mean it lines up with that, if all this other bull **** is happening that sure as hell could make sense. All these names are just bs....Gundy was never coming. Hell I don't know, I'm lost.
So what happened to Currie being fired if Doeren was not hired today? I am starting to think we have an entire group of boosters with no balls. The longer he is still employed the less I have faith in anybody doing anything about him. It seems that while we may want him fired, there are still a bunch of people supporting him internally. Are you telling me that NOBODY can or will stand up to Haslam? Nobody else can turn the tide and actually help us get a good coach that fits Tennessee?
What are your thoughts on Davenport?
In some ways I believe shes on our side (like the janitorial services & possibly not signing Brohms deal ) however Im on the fence with her
for the sake of argument and conversation, playing devil's advocate here..
how plausible would it be for JG to have been in play all along? no talks of anyone leading up 'til Sunday and all of a sudden the Schiano nuke? Around the time JG allegedly signed and asked for this 7 day roundup if you will of staff. Over the next few days reports fly out of 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th.. coach approached or talked to for the job, while all the work was already done on our end. Beav said PM would take one for the team on this, what if that was the upfront brunt of the mess to hopefully sooth over the fan base to keep what happened from happening. Which leaves to question, maybe the play was JG and the last few days have been nothing more than stories to keep fans pacified for maybe, 7 days or so? Especially with everything looking as if it's coming full circle "within 48 hrs, if we make a call"?
There's no question the Haslam influence has obviously been an issue for a while I don't disagree with, and even more so for certain people. Could this possibly be for some a perfect time to push personal agenda's like say oust one and replace with another? It's just been pretty obvious the current AD hasn't been very popular for a while with some. which rightfully so, he's not been very popular with many since Sunday, but the were a lot all ears and smiles when he promised to "open the checkbook" and deliver a "homerun hire". replies, comments, feel welcome. conspiracies are always intriguing
like I said for the sake of argument and conversation, I do not necessarily feel this way but begs to question being a possibility?
never say never to anything
Guys, just stop. I've been on the Gruden train this whole time, but there's no way Peyton, Currie, haslam, fulmer, and Davenport are committing career suicide and ruining another coaches reputation as well as theirs justbto hold off on announcing gruden. Think about this for a minute...