North Korea USA Summit

#301
#301
lawgator1 said:
This is getting stranger by the minute. Now it turns out a former admin official signed of on the bill, Tillerson and he spoke, and the official believes Trump must have known about it and personally okayed it. It is odd that there has been no denial, yet. Trump is usually on twitter by now in such a controversy, blaiming someone else.
Click to expand...
Did money change hands? That’s my question.
 
#307
#307
Strange move on NK's part, seeing that it was basically getting a pass so long as it didn't do missile launches.
 
#308
#308
He's pushing the limits as they always do. These were not ballistic missiles. What's interesting is this happened right after his visit with Putin. Pay attention to me!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RDU VOL#14
#309
#309
37L1 said:
He's pushing the limits as they always do. These were not ballistic missiles. What's interesting is this happened right after his visit with Putin. Pay attention to me!
Click to expand...
Which makes me think he got Putin’s approval to start being a jackwad again.
 
#312
#312
Even if it was.... $2 million and we got what was left of Otto back. How many millions did Obola give to Iran and what did we get out of it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
#319
#319
37L1 said:
He's pushing the limits as they always do. These were not ballistic missiles. What's interesting is this happened right after his visit with Putin. Pay attention to me!
Click to expand...

I think if I’m in South Korea I’m more concerned with the massive artillery barrage that would take place. Do you really need nukes if you have simple conventional pieces that can drop about a million kilograms of high explosive per square kilometer per hour?
 
#324
#324
Hunerwadel said:
Of course NK is going to try to get around the sanctions. In order to succeed we have to go after assets of the countries buying from them or supplying them. Are you listening China and Russia?
Click to expand...

Agree, but, here, the path of least resistance is to blockade this little numbnut. We have to deal with both Russia and China independently and separately. Even though China is pulling N. Korea's strings.
 
#325
#325
tennvols77 said:
Agree, but, here, the path of least resistance is to blockade this little numbnut. We have to deal with both Russia and China independently and separately. Even though China is pulling N. Korea's strings.
Click to expand...

A blockade may have some effect. But in some circumstances (mostly traditional) a blockade can be considered act of war. Maybe that's no big deal when dealing with NK. The problem is that NKs main benefactors are China and Russia. They both have a land and maritime border with NK. NK ships could potentially stay in their territorial waters before heading out to open sea. Would we essentially be blockading China and Russia too?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top