Norm Chow endorses Sark for OC

#28
#28
beachmaster said:
I'm gonna get blasted for this, but Norm Chow at one time was a very good OC at USC. It just didn't translate to pro football.
Click to expand...
It’s the truth. He was a very good OC at one time. And I believe Sarkisian would be a good hire.
 
Last edited:
#31
#31
BigOrangeTrain said:
Under Sarks guidance, the Falcons offense took a nose dive this past season. Why do you think Sark is so good?
Click to expand...
Back off your agenda. I asked a simple question. Some of you people need to go outside and get fresh air now and again for new perspective. 'Xcuse me if I'm not up on the latest bitchfest.
d12.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: dduncan4163, Behr and Type Orange+
#34
#34
MaTaLa said:
Back off your agenda. I asked a simple question. Some of you people need to go outside and get fresh air now and again for new perspective. 'Xcuse me if I'm not up on the latest bitchfest.
d12.jpg
Click to expand...

Ok. And I just asked a simple question as well. But whatever.
 
#35
#35
We should be comparing potential hires to someone competent. If it is reasonable to compare them to Larry Scott then I don't want them. If we can't do better then Sark then I have a feeling things will get ugly fast on the hill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolunteerHillbilly and 82_VOL_83
#36
#36
MaTaLa said:
Back off your agenda. I asked a simple question. Some of you people need to go outside and get fresh air now and again for new perspective. 'Xcuse me if I'm not up on the latest bitchfest.
d12.jpg
Click to expand...
CJP shouldn't give Sark the time of day. The guy has way more issues off the field to even begin with how bad of an OC he is.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: VolunteerHillbilly, TeeMartinwins98 and BigOrangeTrain
#37
#37
BigOrangeTrain said:
Ok. So how many seasons has he spent as a true college OC? And why are you bringing up Larry Scott?
Click to expand...
Cuz Larry Scott is the bottom. You’re doing the interpretive argument thing with the “true college OC” thing. Officially TWO but tack on 7 more since he called plays as HC of both Washington and USC...so 9 seasons and one NC game as a college play caller.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Behr, chargervol and peaygolf
#39
#39
butchna said:
Cuz Larry Scott is the bottom. You’re doing the interpretive argument thing with the “true college OC” thing. Officially TWO but tack on 7 more since he called plays as HC of both Washington and USC...so 9 seasons and one NC game as a college play caller.
Click to expand...

So he had Nussmeire for 3 years at Washington but I guess Sark called at the plays. Dont buy it. Its not interpretive argument. Its just a statement. Scott is irrelevant. Think someone like Cheney. Thats a true college OC. A guy who has not been questioned about his history or play calling attributes. Again I ask,what makes Sark so desirable? Because he worked under Saban? Or Carrol?
 
#40
#40
MaTaLa said:
Who is left that is better than Sark and somewhere within the realm of possibility?
Click to expand...

Sark isnt technically available since he is still with the Falcons at the moment. There are many OCs better than Sark. As far as who is available or in the realm of possibility those are a little cloudy. Many times, no assistant coach is available. They get hired away. So I think it all comes down to the right situation for the right guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#42
#42
CA_Vol said:
If the off the field issues are resolved? How about the on the field issues? Has he even watched a Falcons game this year? He has more weapons than almost anyone and can’t figure out how to use them.
Click to expand...
Minor detail! Just because the Falcons went from Super Bowl to super-dismal in a cliff-falling second once he took over the offense doesn't mean we shouldn't hire him. Why would we want someone who's good at the job and will lead to points on the scoreboard?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and CA_Vol
#45
#45
BigOrangeTrain said:
So he had Nussmeire for 3 years at Washington but I guess Sark called at the plays. Dont buy it. Its not interpretive argument. Its just a statement. Scott is irrelevant. Think someone like Cheney. Thats a true college OC. A guy who has not been questioned about his history or play calling attributes. Again I ask,what makes Sark so desirable? Because he worked under Saban? Or Carrol?
Click to expand...
Barely worked under Saban...so yeah Carroll. Sark called the plays and Nussmeier helped gameplan...PROVE me wrong. 😉
 
#46
#46
lifeisdeep said:
Minor detail! Just because the Falcons went from Super Bowl to super-dismal in a cliff-falling second once he took over the offense doesn't mean we shouldn't hire him. Why would we want someone who's good at the job and will lead to points on the scoreboard?
Click to expand...

Where is the proof that he is good at his job or would lead to him putting points up here at TN?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83
#47
#47
MaTaLa said:
Who is left that is better than Sark and somewhere within the realm of possibility?
Click to expand...
This is every bit as sound as when people tried to argue we should keep Botch because there wasn't anyone better available. The only way Sark would be the best available OC is if there were a national OC convention in Vegas and in one night they all went the Mike Price route to public shame.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83 and VolunteerHillbilly
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top