Pretty sure that gets pointed out every day in here. And nobody is saying they want a team full of 2 stars. Only that the very few we actually target may in fact be underrated and hopefully we can trust the coaches to evaluate better than the sites.
But I don't want to impede anyone from trying to win the Hyper Bole on this board.
That's a remarkable criticism considering guys like Calvert, J Johnson, Locklear, and Carvin will behind four 5* guys and a 4* guy... without counting the 2020 signees. They'll have about 13 or 14 scholarship OL's without this kid... not sure how many more scholarships you can devote to OL.
Been a lot of low ranked guys grabbed who are then bumped to higher ratings. Happens all the time. Dude might be a 3 star after they evaluate his senior tape. Who knows? But I’m not going to act like because Rivals rated him a 2 star that means he sucks and will never be good. That’s ludicrous.
Correct, Boise St for instance would have been a big time outlier on that scale from a few years back especially. The weakness of the ACC and the strength of the SEC also highlight that point in regards to Clemson and Georgia respectively. Lots of variables that have to be considered.