OHvol40
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2008
- Messages
- 9,834
- Likes
- 5,834
It has way more facts and science than the current weather change arguments. He did a good job relating complex ideas better than most could. As a former trainer I can say that being able to present topics in a simplified style to communicate with the average lay person is NOT easy.I’m convinced that was made for 3rd graders… and might be AI. Lots of neat pictures and illustrations though, so, cool.
There is no science, only suggestion/hypothesis, but I understand.It has way more facts and science than the current weather change arguments. He did a good job relating complex ideas better than most could. As a former trainer I can say that being able to present topics in a simplified style to communicate with the average lay person is NOT easy.
holy cow, im a vegan..Cows are vegan.
The cow eats the grass... clover... herbs.... wildflowers. The diverse, mineral-rich, organically grown plant matter from the field.
The cow converts all of that plant material into complete protein, bioavailable heme iron, zinc, B12, fat-soluble vitamins, omega-3 fatty acids, creatine, and carnosine.
Using its four stomachs. Which are considerably better at this than yours.
So technically, the most efficient way to eat a plant-based diet is to let a cow do it first.
The cow is the blender.
The cow is doing the processing you cannot do yourself.
When you eat beef, you are eating a hyperconcentrated, biologically optimised, grass-powered superfood that a vegan has been assembling for you in a field for eighteen months.
This is hogwash.The point that you’re missing is that the actual experts that work on these reports aren’t going to change their tune, it’s basically settled science. If we see a report from this admin, it won’t be a collaborative interdepartmental effort. So, if the people doing the work change their minds, I’ll listen. They aren’t going to though.
This hypothetical is the underpinning of the problem though, the issue has become political because so much $ is at stake… but who actually has our best interests in mind is a question everyone should be asking themselves when consuming climate change info.
Thanks for the lecture on science riddled with opinionThis is hogwash.
First science is never settled. Real science is an inductive process so nothing can be proved absolutely. Counter example can disprove but nothing can be proved by example.
Second, history is rife with science hoaxes. Recent ones would include Y2K and the pandemic. Y2K was a massive payday for a lot of people and most of the people who knew kept quiet and raked. The pandemic was a power and money grab. Dr. Fauci himself profited greatly on his interests. It also was the tightest control over the American people the government ever had. Both were of them the result of dishonest junk science.
Climate Change is the maybe the biggest hoax in history.
I'm not saying that the pandemic was a hoax but by following the science was. Wearing masks and shutting down everything a total power grab excused by "following the science" which was not supported by science and Fauci knew that.Wish I could retroactively take you to work with me during your self-described “dishonest junk science” pandemic.
So anyone who uses their position to enrich themselves should be in prison (which I don’t disagree with), well sit down, I’ve got a real doozy of a story for you about our current president…I'm not saying that the pandemic was a hoax but by following the science was. Wearing masks and shutting down everything a total power grab excused by "following the science" which was not supported by science and Fauci new that.
Flattening the curve didn't save one life, it only extended the pandemic. Hospitals raked because everything became covid to get the extra $. (my wife is a nurse who deals with financials, so I could tell you some stories as well) Pharmaceutical company made bank on mandated vaccine. Fauci enriched himself, he got money his for gain of function research that helped create the virus and he made money of his pharmaceutical interests. He should really be in jail.
The 1918 Spanish Flu was much more serious and nobody did that crap. It makes sense to protect the vulnerable and at risk, but shutting down low risk people is stupid, science will tell you that a lot of people will get it and the vast majority will be ok.
The "science behind all that was garbage, corrupt, and greedy.
Y2K wasn't a science hoax. It was a real issue to which many overreacted.This is hogwash.
First science is never settled. Real science is an inductive process so nothing can be proved absolutely. Counter example can disprove but nothing can be proved by example.
Second, history is rife with science hoaxes. Recent ones would include Y2K and the pandemic. Y2K was a massive payday for a lot of people and most of the people who knew kept quiet and raked. The pandemic was a power and money grab. Dr. Fauci himself profited greatly on his interests. It also was the tightest control over the American people the government ever had. Both were of them the result of dishonest junk science.
Climate Change is the maybe the biggest hoax in history.
You should look at the history. A lot of places did take measures similar to what were used during the pandemic and they helped.I'm not saying that the pandemic was a hoax but by following the science was. Wearing masks and shutting down everything a total power grab excused by "following the science" which was not supported by science and Fauci new that.
Flattening the curve didn't save one life, it only extended the pandemic. Hospitals raked because everything became covid to get the extra $. (my wife is a nurse who deals with financials, so I could tell you some stories as well) Pharmaceutical company made bank on mandated vaccine. Fauci enriched himself, he got money his for gain of function research that helped create the virus and he made money of his pharmaceutical interests. He should really be in jail.
The 1918 Spanish Flu was much more serious and nobody did that crap.
It makes sense to protect the vulnerable and at risk, but shutting down low risk people is stupid, science will tell you that a lot of people will get it and the vast majority will be ok.
The "science behind all that was garbage, corrupt, and greedy.
Yep. Climate change, and the stupid people that actually went along with it and actually thought we could actually control the weather are embarrassments. The sun, or lack of sun, makes ALL our weather.Climate change is the biggest hoax in the history of the World. The Earth's fluctuating temperature is due to Sun cycles and can be predicted by Sunspot activity. We are due for and many think on the cusp of the next Grand Solar Minimum, which means the Earth could experience and extended cooling period (10-30 years). Why did global warming suddenly become climate change? Hmmm
CO2 is small fraction of atmosphere. There is no correlation the rise of CO2 and Earth temperature. The rise in CO2 levels has been exponential, the Earth's temperature has not.
The climate change industry rivals the oil industry in scope and a lot of people, including scientist and universities are dependent on it. That's why it is so fiercely defended and anyone has a dissenting view is shouted down. The Sun warms the Earth.
That is all.
No shite the climate changes. It’s called weather patterns, seasonal and macro.Y2K wasn't a science hoax. It was a real issue to which many overreacted.
The pandemic wasn't a hoax. It was a very real threat to which many over- or underreacted or otherwise mishandled.
Climate change is real. It's the extent to which humans cause it that's open to debate.
Uh, I was there. The cost far outweighed the benefit. Trying to lock everyone up and shutting down was stupid and I didn’t participate. Life went on as normal and I didn’t die. Besides if you live your life so afraid of death that you don’t live, you’re already dead. WGWTFA.You should look at the history. A lot of places did take measures similar to what were used during the pandemic and they helped.
