I'm baffled that after knowing the extent of the dumpster fire under Pruitt that extended into every aspect of the program, people are still trying to evaluate what happened on the field under him as some kind of indicator of success. No quarterback in Pruitt's tenure looked good for more than a random part of some games. Hell, JG may actually be competent at WSU. You can't know because the coaching/schemes/playcalling was that pathetic of not only the QB, but the OL/WR/RB. It was a mix of Fulmer's worst offensive traits and Pruitt's unique crapshow mentality that produced putrid results out of some fairly talented players across the board.
Maurer continually got put into terrible spots in his career to date. "Hey, let's start him against the best defenses in the league!" 'Hey, lets give him 3 plays and yank him but leave JG in when he plays much worse!" Nothing that happened under Pruitt should be used to judge any player, especially offensive players. I can only assume Cheney was a spineless check casher who just put up with whatever because UT threw more money at him than anyone else in the country was willing to throw at him.
I don't care who the QB is, I just want them to look competent. I think that won't be an issue with Huepel especially in the seasons after this one.