i'm not sure why we're so dead set on always have an either/or situation....
and situationally, i don't know why we wouldn't consider les miles at this point? Last week, i was a firm NO on Les Miles for many, if not all, of the reasons many of you have outlined here.
but our situation is totally different today than it was 3 days ago.
and to me, what Lane Kiffin or Les Miles does for us is they give you a face of your program and provide identity. they're both likable personalities for both media and fans, they both can recruit and both could probably salvage at least some of the immediate future of the program, while also setting it up for the future.
now, where you fall on either person lies in the differences....Miles probably has no shot at being a 10-15 year solution. but that's ok, we're in a short term mess right now, and Miles could bring immediate stability and provide a foundation for what comes next...3-5 years from now....bottom line, he buys you time, and gives you an option on the future. he's a very good man, really good personality, and checks all the boxes football wise you want.
Lane on the other hand could be closer to that 10-15 year solution, assuming he sticks around. he's not a bad guy, just kinda douchey, but he also couldn't care less what anyone thinks, and honestly, we might need that near term. he can recruit, he's a great offensive mind, and i think he could most certainly salvage the immediate future.
it doesn't matter...we're not getting either one. but as fans, i don't know why we have to pigeon hole ourselves. either one of these two could be good for us, given our current situation.