Orangeburst
Jesus-I am the light of the world. (John 8:12)
- Joined
- Jun 19, 2008
- Messages
- 53,460
- Likes
- 129,131
In football terms, Graham was the equivalent of the backup qb coming in when his team was down 24-3 in the 4th quarter. He changed the momentum of the hearing, and scored the first TD on his own.Just saw highlights of Lindsay Graham. Ho lee crap!
He vocalized the frustration most of the country feels about politicians in general. I'm a fan.
turned the worm. He single handedly got the rest of the school yard to kick the bullies' off school property.In football terms, Graham was the equivalent of the backup qb coming in when his team was down 24-3 in the 4th quarter. He changed the momentum of the hearing, and scored the first TD on his own.
I have no respect for either. I am an I.So who in here does not affiliate themselves with Republicans or democrats ?
I ask because I want to see what the general reaction is from the non party voters.
As an I, democrats lost this one badly. Rs made a great move getting a professional to ask on their behalf. it was informative, nonpartisan and the most productive line of questioning throughout the entire day. While in session 1 the Rs had great questions asked on their behalf, the Ds decided to grandstand and took very little effort to look into the credibility of the allegations. Why? Shouldnt they be motivated to have all information in a fair manner so make the best decision for this country?
Session 2... the gloves came off for the Rs and they decided to grandstand. In this moment, it would have benefitted the Ds to have the prosecutor or their own council ask the equivalent quality questions but instead they kept politicizing and pounded the table with a red herring instead of actually attempting to investigate. One even admitted political differences influenced his opinion on the credibility of BK.
I think the Ds looked swampish today. Again this is as an I.
Anyone else?
So who in here does not affiliate themselves with Republicans or democrats ?
I ask because I want to see what the general reaction is from the non party voters.
As an I, democrats lost this one badly. Rs made a great move getting a professional to ask on their behalf. it was informative, nonpartisan and the most productive line of questioning throughout the entire day. While in session 1 the Rs had great questions asked on their behalf, the Ds decided to grandstand and took very little effort to look into the credibility of the allegations. Why? Shouldnt they be motivated to have all information in a fair manner to make the best decision for this country?
Session 2... the gloves came off for the Rs and they decided to grandstand. In this moment, it would have benefitted the Ds to have the prosecutor or their own council ask the equivalent quality questions but instead they kept politicizing and pounded the table with a red herring instead of actually attempting to investigate. One even admitted political differences influenced his opinion on the credibility of BK.
I think the Ds looked swampish today. Again this is as an I.
Anyone else?