Kavanaugh Confirmation

[lawgator1]

Sure you can. You can believe she is sincere in the idea that she was sexually assaulted by someone at some point in her life. There's just no evidence that Kavanaugh is responsible for that.

Then she is just mistaken, right?
By definition then she is not part of a conspiracy with the Dems.

 

[LSU-SIU]

Yes he did.

He said the whole thing is untrue and a scam by the Dems.

Yes, he said what she was not true and yes, he believes bad people are doing bad things... these things were not directed at her. The only thing directed at her was his rebuttal, which is I wasn't there and I didn't do it.

You are looking foolish.

He didn't even call her a liar, he said it just simply didn't happen... and all the other people collaborate his memory as well.

 

[Orangeburst]

Well been reading here not logged in on the desktop while watching on the phone.

I’m glad the senators took over the questioning. I think K handled his testimony very well and showed a very human side. He made no real trip ups. D’s kept trying to get him to ask for a stoppage and FBI investigation. That will be spun into him trying to avoid more scrutiny. Grassley had his back on that though.

I don’t see how it doesn’t just go down party lines, maybe flip Manchin or another red state D.

Have to believe he will get confirmed now though. And what a damn fiasco.

ND40...You cannot post anymore until you convert -40F to Celsius? If answered in 2 seconds you may proceed with posting on Volnation.

 

[37L1]

I've watched him. Heard him.

He says he does not doubt her sincerity.

Then he says she made it up as part of a political plot by the Dems.

It makes no sense.

If it makes no sense, then you of all people should understand it better than the rest of us.

 

[tumscalcium]

Then she is just mistaken, right?
By definition then she is not part of a conspiracy with the Dems.

Nice “mistake”.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

Easy way?

Divide by half, subtract 32.

Ok I'll take the easy way

 

[1972 Grad]

I think she probably is telling some element of truth. Something happened. She just has no idea what.

"Psychology" "professor" in "California." The only 3 words you need to know. 3 strikes and she's out.

 

[Orangeburst]

I have more important issues at the moment...

Candy Corn or Mellowcream Pumpkins?

Nasty..

 

[Stew Cook]

What does that have to do with the best evidence we have not including her friend not even placing Kavanaugh at this party? Much less that something did or may have happened at this party regarding him and her friend.

OK, one more go on this, why not..

I didn't think there was any corroborating evidence with Ford, only compelling testimony. Any potentially worthy investigation I can imagine, at this point, would be Ramirez s claim.

 

[lawgator1]

Nice “mistake”.

So you think she made it all up?

 

[tumscalcium]

Y’all wrong.

farenheit to celcius - Google Search

 

[37L1]

I wonder if Dr. Ford would have come forward if the nominee was named by President Hillary and shared her views on things?

No I don't wonder, I lied.

Investigate me.

 

[LSU-SIU]

So you think she made it all up?

Or I guess its possible 5 people are in on a conspiracy including her best friend at the time, yet that doesn't explain why she can't remember what she can't remember... which is about 99% of the basic facts.

 

[Orangeburst]

No.

K done popped a top.

Would it not be ironic if he went out and got blasted tonight?

 

[tumscalcium]

So you think she made it all up?

We’re talking about your “oops, honest mistake.” That’s some mistake.

Oh my bad, might have been someone else. Really, LG?

 

[Stew Cook]

No the FBI has no real jurisdiction to investigate, they have no real power without jurisdiction. Can they take cooperating witness statements, sure, but the committee can do that too as well, you're at the end of the process.

I'm able to see your point. So where is the harm, as I have asked ,to say "sure, the FBI should investigate"?

 

[C-south]

Actually its one person's word against 5 other people, one of which was her best friend at the time.

True. Adds even more to the absurdity of delaying confirmation with an FBI investigation.

 

[Orange_Crush]

She went through a few rounds then Lindsay Graham rocked the Mic and everybody followed suit. Somewhere they decided to take over the role of bringing the heat from Kavanaugh.

One R had courage which swung the winds of change, then the cowards stepped up to let their hair blow beautifully in the breeze.

 

[Orangeslice13]

Pays better.

And I’m pretty good at building stuff

 

[LSU-SIU]

I'm able to see your point. So where is the harm, as I have asked ,to say "sure, the FBI should investigate"?

Well, there is no harm in the committee investigating, which is what this process is. But no the FBI won't be investigating, but they can take statements.... of course, all those statements can or could have been taken by the committee including the democrats on the committee. Not sure what your point is, this is the investigation.

 

[Stew Cook]

Where do they start the hypothetical investigation? No crime scene, witnesses, or any other tangible evidence. It’s one person’s word vs another and they did that today.

Again, Ramirez.. but I've been suggesting to just do it to shut down the narrative.

 

[Orange_Crush]

I think she probably is telling some element of truth. Something happened. She just has no idea what.

I would agree with that.

 

[Stew Cook]

Well, there is no harm in the committee investigating, which is what this process is. But no the FBI won't be investigating, but they can take statements.... of course, all those statements can or could have been taken by the committee including the democrats on the committee. Not sure what your point is, this is the investigation.

What have the Dems been asking for?

 

[InVOLuntary]

I have more important issues at the moment...

Candy Corn or Mellowcream Pumpkins?

 

[Grand Vol]

Nasty..

You shut your pie hole!