Kavanaugh Confirmation

[NurseGoodVol]

Look, nerd, I spent a lot of time in Europe and it gets you in the ball park.

Lol.....hahaha

 

[Orangeslice13]

Took you a while on your roof though.

Uuuhhh
Wut?

 

[Roustabout]

I'm asking you, is she sincere and just making a mistake in saying it was K?

Or is she making the entire thing up at the urging of a Dem conspiracy?

Both cannot be true. But K and the GOP keep saying both. Sometimes in the very next sentence.

I think something happened to her in her past. It wouldn’t be the first time that a victim has misidentified someone due to trauma.
Keep in mind, she shared this with no one. She doesn’t claim to have been raped only that she feared she might be. The mind is a powerful thing especially for people who are already imbalanced and traumatized. Listening to her she fits the bill.
How would you remember wearing a swimsuit under your clothes and not remember how you got home? Why would you wear a swimsuit under your clothes? It wasn’t a swim party from any of the testimony I’ve heard.

 

[Orangeburst]

Ummmmm.... -40C ?

You may enter the forum pit of misery!

 

[Mick]

Uuuhhh
Wut?

That blue tarp was hideous.

 

[GAVol]

That is not the same as saying they planted her. Nor is it an answer to what she says.

I don't think she's a plant. I do think there's a possibility that they shopped for somebody like her. There's an even stronger possibility that once they found her, they took advantage of the calendar.

 

[Orange_Crush]

That is not the same as saying they planted her. Nor is it an answer to what she says.

When did he say she was a plant? I missed that. He said that she was being used to smear him for political purposes. He also said that his heart goes out to her, but he didn't do what she claims he did.

Me personally, I waffle between the two. I could see this. But the forced broken voice with no tears seemed incredibly fake to me and had me leaning toward her being a liar. The half mil in gofundme isn't a good look either. I suspect it's a convenient way to launder money and pay for testimony.
But I will concede I don't know much and she may be genuine.

 

[37L1]

I think something happened to her in her past. It wouldn’t be the first time that a victim has misidentified someone due to trauma.
Keep in mind, she shared this with no one. She doesn’t claim to have been raped only that she feared she might be. The mind is a powerful thing especially for people who are already imbalanced and traumatized. Listening to her she fits the bill.
How would you remember wearing a swimsuit under your clothes and not remember how you got home? Why would you wear a swimsuit under your clothes? It wasn’t a swim party from any of the testimony I’ve heard.

She went swimming prior to going to the house "party". You weren't listening closely enough, a lot of distractions to be sure.

 

[NorthDallas40]

You may enter the forum pit of misery!

Dilly dilly

 

[lawgator1]

When did he say she was a plant? I missed that. He said that she was being used to smear him for political purposes. He also said that his heart goes out to her, but he didn't do what she claims he did.

Me personally, I waffle between the two. I could see this. But the forced broken voice with no tears seemed incredibly fake to me and had me leaning toward her being a liar. The half mil in gofundme isn't a good look either. I suspect it's a convenient way to launder money and pay for testimony.
But I will concede I don't know much and she may be genuine.

And now you are doing it.

She's sincere but mistaken as to who it was.

And she's getting paid.

 

[Stew Cook]

De nada, amigo. I was surprised and confused by the back and forth, but no apology needed unless you need one from me.

Of course not. I need glasses. I used to need them only for my phone, but now It's my tablet too, apparently.

 

[Orangeslice13]

That blue tarp was hideous.

Never used a blue tarp on the roof.

 

[NurseGoodVol]

I'm asking you, is she sincere and just making a mistake in saying it was K?

Or is she making the entire thing up at the urging of a Dem conspiracy?

Both cannot be true. But K and the GOP keep saying both. Sometimes in the very next sentence.

That's because everyone is tiptoeing around saying she's lying. No one will say it. It would be the kiss of death.

 

[Orange_Crush]

I think something happened to her in her past. It wouldn’t be the first time that a victim has misidentified someone due to trauma.
Keep in mind, she shared this with no one. She doesn’t claim to have been raped only that she feared she might be. The mind is a powerful thing especially for people who are already imbalanced and traumatized. Listening to her she fits the bill.
How would you remember wearing a swimsuit under your clothes and not remember how you got home? Why would you wear a swimsuit under your clothes? It wasn’t a swim party from any of the testimony I’ve heard.

Her testimony was that she left a pool to go to the day-party, I do believe.

 

[82_VOL_83]

To go the other way...….100* C , multiply by 9/5...…..100x 9/5= 180. Then, add 32. 180+32=212.

Multiply C by 2 then subtract C X .2 and add 32.

100 * 2=200
100*.2=20
200-20=180
180+32=212

 

[evillawyer]

 

[LSU-SIU]

And now you are doing it.

She's sincere but mistaken as to who it was.

And she's getting paid.

What law school did you supposedly get a degree from? LOL

Whether she is sincere is mostly irrelevant because she has almost no facts. The only real fact that she could get collaboration on i.e. there was a party... you have 4 other people that deny that. Whether she is getting paid is really secondary but it could be used as to her credibility.. but we really never get there because she has no real facts to be credible about.

She can be sincere about something that is untrue. And she can be sincere if she is being paid, and she can be sincere if she is telling the truth.

Update I changed 5 people to 4, because I don't think that Mark submitted an affidavit.

 

[Orange_Crush]

And now you are doing it.

She's sincere but mistaken as to who it was.

And she's getting paid.

I clearly stated that I am waffling on the two options. One would think a lawyer would recognize an "or" argument as opposed to an "and" argument. (God, I miss the eye-roll emoji.)

 

[Orange_Crush]

And now you are doing it.

She's sincere but mistaken as to who it was.

And she's getting paid.

There is no way you're a lawyer.

 

[1972 Grad]

You may enter the forum pit of misery!

Example: Minus 40 F.....subtract 32. minus 40 less 32 = minus 72. Then minus 72 x 5/9. Minus 72 x 5/9 = minus 40 C.

 

[Orangeslice13]

There is no way you're a lawyer.

I’ve been saying this for a while

 

[Orange_Crush]

Of course not. I need glasses. I used to need them only for my phone, but now It's my tablet too, apparently.

I'll be more apt to ask what you thought I'd said next time.

 

[luthervol]

Spartacus and you have a common theme in your ramblings. Idiocy.

I would have asked K, "is it possible that a reasonable person could listen to Ford's testimony and believe her?"

Follow up would be, "if a person believes her testimony, would it be reasonable to vote against your confirmation?"

 

[1972 Grad]

Multiply C by 2 then subtract C X .2 and add 32.

100 * 2=200
100*.2=20
200-20=180
180+32=212

Basically you are multiplying by 1.8, which I list is 9/5. Same thing.

 

[LSU-SIU]

I would have asked K, "is it possible that a reasonable person could listen to Ford's testimony and believe her?"

Follow up would be, "if a person believes her testimony, would it be reasonable to vote against your confirmation?"

That's just setting up a strawman which is what they were trying to do. If that was the case, you would have no appointments ever being filled.

He actually answered similar to what I would have done... I have no doubt she believes something happen but it didn't involve me, nor is there any proof that any of this really happen.

What it is... is trying to be too cute because, well, delay. LOL Nobody is fooled. LOL