LSU-SIU
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
- Messages
- 14,416
- Likes
- 8,198
Do explain GV?
Sure thing.
You're doubling down on the intellectual dishonest.
But anywho... We'll just both agree I wasn't referring to the deep state, and everyone else can see that you're being coy to the point of dishonesty.
The allegations that DiFi had back before. Its reasonable that it should have been investigated then and that is the responsibility of the minority in this situation.
Do you actually believe what you post?I get flack for pointing out the obvious,. that an FBI investigation would help the man be all squeaky clean. He says his life has been destroyed by accusations. How would he possibly recover from such a thing. Maybe by having a tantrum at a Senate hearing will do it.
So let me get this straight, defending your name to baseless accusations is now the equivalent of having a tantrum.I get flack for pointing out the obvious,. that an FBI investigation would help the man be all squeaky clean. He says his life has been destroyed by accusations. How would he possibly recover from such a thing. Maybe by having a tantrum at a Senate hearing will do it.
So the FBI background checks he's had to be a federal judge don't count?I get flack for pointing out the obvious,. that an FBI investigation would help the man be all squeaky clean. He says his life has been destroyed by accusations. How would he possibly recover from such a thing. Maybe by having a tantrum at a Senate hearing will do it.
That response was completely misplaced. I don't care what you think. I care about what I said and your inability to either comprehend it, or speak with truth and candor about it.I get flack for pointing out the obvious,. that an FBI investigation would help the man be all squeaky clean. He says his life has been destroyed by accusations. How would he possibly recover from such a thing. Maybe by having a tantrum at a Senate hearing will do it.