JCP201
VFL GIRL, better or worse.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2010
- Messages
- 17,735
- Likes
- 58,254
So, did judge work at the grocery store? Too bad we don't have an investigatory body, maybe a bureau of a federal sort, that could look into this.
I’m fine with either statement. I’m fine with it because both are true.Why is that considered a reasonable statement, but "it's not uncommon for young black men in bad parts of town to deal drugs?" is considered totally out of bounds? Aren't both statements prejudiced? Should any alleged incident be judged on the facts of that specific situation?
See, this is the issue I have with this clownshow of a hearing. You are making the assumption that Kavanagh is guilty solely on emotion.I’m fine with either statement. I’m fine with it because both are true.
Most sexual assaults go unreported. My wife never reported hers. No witnesses. So, do you want to tell me how it never happened. I tell you what, you name the place, and you can tell me to my face.
If so, I would sure as heck like to know why should would willingly go into that store, knowing how emotionally-distressing the alleged event was -- you know: causing her to struggle in school, not be able to make friends, and dislike the aesthetics of her house's front elevation.
Even if both statements are true, it doesn't matter. Do you not agree that a person accused of something should be judged on the facts of that specific situation, not by whatever is "common" or what the stereotype is?I’m fine with either statement. I’m fine with it because both are true.
Most sexual assaults go unreported. My wife never reported hers. No witnesses. So, do you want to tell me how it never happened. I tell you what, you name the place, and you can tell me to my face.
Yup, without corroboration or some sort of evidence outside of a witness testimony, I cant even start to be moved with him being guilty of anything.Even if both statements are true, it doesn't matter. Do you not agree that a person accused of something should be judged on the facts of that specific situation, not by whatever is "common" or what the stereotype is?
This isn’t a criminal trial dumbass. I’m assuming the witness and the others that have come forward are not part of a larger conspiracy by dims.See, this is the issue I have with this clownshow of a hearing. You are making the assumption that Kavanagh is guilty solely on emotion.