Kavanaugh Confirmation

[FallBranchChick]

How many of those arrested have been arrested due to some tie between Trump and Russia proving collusion? Isn't the number zero?

I agree that both political parties are dirty, but in this case, it's the Dems sinking to new lows this time. I won't be surprised if the GOP returns the favor.

According to her own yearbooks, Ford wasn't a choir girl, either. They've tried to let her have her say but she kept deflecting. Now we wait and see if she shows up tomorrow.

She won’t show, the resistance isn’t worth prison time

 

[Grand Vol]

This nomination has got to be the most absurd thing I've ever seen in my life from so called adults.

Hollywood couldn't even script something this asinine.

 

[Obsessed]

You triggered bro?

Look out your window and see..

 

[volfanhill]

It wasn't used by Biden. He did propose it though.

So did the Dems use it in 92 or not? I get he proposed it. If they didn’t then the GOP needs stop brining it up as some excuse for how they treated Garland.

 

[InVOLuntary]

Kavenaugh's former highschool girlfriend is on Hannity and says these accusations are "outrageous and none of it is true".

 

[Orange_Crush]

I'd check where those donations originated from. Seems like a good way to hide payoffs.

That's what Q has been saying for quite some time, FWIW.

 

[1972 Grad]

Do you believe that Garland should have been voted on?

Too late now. I guess Scalia died in vain, as far as the Dems go.

 

[zeppelin128]

So did the Dems use it in 92 or not? I get he proposed it. If they didn’t then the GOP needs stop brining it up as some excuse for how they treated Garland.

No, the Dems did not use it in 92.

 

[1972 Grad]

Democrats learned from Mitch about obstructing judge appointments with Garland for SCOTUS and numerous others for lower courts after 2014.
Not saying this is a good thing, but I think a lot of this is payback to the Turtle.

It started with Bork.

 

[volfanjustin]

So did the Dems use it in 92 or not? I get he proposed it. If they didn’t then the GOP needs stop brining it up as some excuse for how they treated Garland.

Garland didn’t get a vote, he wasn’t accused of being a sexual predator. Huge difference today me for you all to move on from him.

 

[volfanhill]

No, the Dems did not use it in 92.

So then it’s a stupid excuse. Got it. Thanks zepp!

 

[InVOLuntary]

Was it '91 that the dems tried to do the same thing with Clarence Thomas?

 

[volfanjustin]

It started with Bork.

They have a history of destroying judges they don’t agree with

 

[Grand Vol]

This nomination has got to be the most absurd thing I've ever seen in my life from so called adults.

Hollywood couldn't even script something this asinine.

And just so we're clear and the resident libs can take back their likes, I'm referring to the idiot Democrats and their entire immature behavior during this entire affair.

 

[Stew Cook]

It started with Bork.

You should leave Bjork out of this, she ain't done nothin but try to save the planet.

 

[Matt2496]

It started with Bork.

Exactly.

People keep bringing up what happened to Garland, but what they don't realize is that it was Democrats who developed and began using these tactics to begin with. Also, Garland's name wasn't smeared and trashed, unlike Kavanaugh's.

 

[Stew Cook]

And just so we're clear and the resident libs can take back their likes, I'm referring to the idiot Democrats and their entire immature behavior during this entire affair.

If he gets confirmed there would be no stopping his reign of debauchery.

 

[Carl Pickens]

You triggered bro?

No. I'm just tired of listening to a bunch of gutless poons crying over their savior losing to Trump, safe spaces, trannies, pronouns, #metoo, socialism, free s***, white guilt, white supremacy, victimism, redistribution of wealth and other various f'ed up ideologies....

 

[lawgator1]

It's interesting. The Dems in the forum are asking for a full hearing and airing of facts to try to get to the truth. The Republicans here have already decided the women are lying having heard no facts.

 

[volfanhill]

Garland didn’t get a vote, he wasn’t accused of being a sexual predator. Huge difference today me for you all to move on from him.

I am not ok with what’s going on with K. With that said, every time I read something about the Garland nomination, the GOP humpers bring up the Biden rule. It’s not applicable. One senators opinion does not create precedent.

 

[happy-go_vol]

Yes, both Kagan and sotomayor, cruised through. Kagan was highly unqualified and Sotomayor was a previous member of La Raza which is a racist organization. Yet they both cruised through with narry a hitch. Neither love or respect our Constitution, most leftists don’t

Quite accurate. When you have no morals, it's easy to do what they're doing to Kavanaugh.

 

[Grand Vol]

If he gets confirmed there would be no stopping his reign of debauchery.

Drunken toga parties and rape fests all session long.

 

[zeppelin128]

And just so we're clear and the resident libs can take back their likes, I'm referring to the idiot Democrats and their entire immature behavior during this entire affair.

You can keep your likes from me. I haven't liked how this has been handled by Dems from the start.

 

[volfanjustin]

If he gets confirmed there would be no stopping his reign of debauchery.

If you all would just be honest it would be nice, you all don’t care about these women hell you all probably know it’s all lies you just want this nomination blocked because Trump nominated him

 

[happy-go_vol]

I am not ok with what’s going on with K. With that said, every time I read something about the Garland nomination, the GOP humpers bring up the Biden rule. It’s not applicable. One senators opinion does not create precedent.

Oh yes it does. Especially when you have a Marxist trying to get on the court