Kavanaugh Confirmation

It would help if Ramirez' attorney could provide some documentation of an offer along with the terms (including time).

Seems now the claim is we won't testify to the Committee but will to the FBI (knowing I presume there will be no FBI inquiry).

I'm still not sure what prevents someone from going to the FBI on their own unless the FBI would refuse to listen (don't know).

Yeah, should be interesting.
 
And right before the person after you laughs last?

As stupid as I believe Avenatti is it still isn’t clear to me he’s THAT stupid. Time will tell.
Yeah, I have no idea what he may or may not have. But I'll feel somewhat vindicated, if he does have some goods.
 
So The lawyers prepping Ford to answer the Senators’ questions don’t want a lawyer prepping the Senators on the questions to ask? Are Ford’s lawyers going to be in the room counseling her at the hearing?
I'm sure they will be by her side, when the question comes up exactly how much did you drink that night, exhibit A yearbook showing parties where the goal was to drink so much you passed out I'm sure she'll be asking lawyers should i answer this?
 
So Biden said this during the confirmation of a Republican nominee during an election year and you think somehow it makes Dems look bad when vetting a SC nominee? Good Job.
No, the Dims look bad trying to get the FBI to investigate a 30 year old high school party. What will be interesting will be to watch the FBI now starting to investigate ALL 30 year old alleged sexual assault charges. They WILL do that, since it will obviously be in their wheelhouse, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
No, the Dims look bad trying to get the FBI to investigate a 30 year old high school party. What will be interesting will be to watch the FBI now starting to investigate ALL 30 year old alleged sexual assault charges. They WILL do that, since it will obviously be in their wheelhouse, right?
Women will take over the SC. What do you think about that?
 
So Biden said this during the confirmation of a Republican nominee during an election year and you think somehow it makes Dems look bad when vetting a SC nominee? Good Job.

The context was the FBI report returned nothing - Biden was arguing it was worthless because it didn't provide ammunition against Thomas (vetting a SC nominee).

Besides, Anita Hill gave testimony to the Judicial Committee prior to any FBI involvement.

It is entirely relevant.
 
Many, many cases are simply he said/she said. I am not just talking about sexual assault cases. But I find it disgusting that people simply discount the story because it wasn't reported timely. I'd wager that every single male on this board has a family member that was sexually assaulted that never reported it.
I’ve had to be a witness in two separate horse**** rape accusations, 14 and 8 years ago. Lies happen all the time. Women know this crap is stacked heavily in their favor and the trashiest ones take full advantage of it. Dems are butthurt over his nomination and have decided to try and ruin his reputation and life for it. Absolutely disgusting.
She needs to provide some facts. Evidence. If not, buh bye.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top