Kavanaugh Confirmation

#2,776
#2,776
So with news of the Judicial Committee conducting interviews with several people either directly named or implied to be at "the" party, we've moved from he said, she said to he, he and he said, she said (depending on what they said of course).
 
#2,777
#2,777
volinbham said:
So with news of the Judicial Committee conducting interviews with several people either directly named or implied to be at "the" party, we've moved from he said, she said to he, he and he said, she said (depending on what they said of course).
Click to expand...
Which will of course be represented as “well what do you expect them to say?!”
 
#2,778
#2,778
Ed Whalen of the National Review just accused a random guy of being the person who attempted to rape Ford and included the guy's picture and name all over social media.
 
#2,780
#2,780
#2,781
#2,781
carlos86 said:
Ed Whalen of the National Review just accused a random guy of being the person who attempted to rape Ford and included the guy's picture and name all over social media.
Click to expand...
Hope Ed likes being sued. He better have proof, just like Ms Ford.
 
#2,783
#2,783
volinbham said:
So with news of the Judicial Committee conducting interviews with several people either directly named or implied to be at "the" party, we've moved from he said, she said to he, he and he said, she said (depending on what they said of course).
Click to expand...

If you have three of the five, or the four, whichever the number is supposed to be, on the same page, it's pretty much a lock. That's any easy calculation, and a good reason for Grassley to expedite the interviews.
 
#2,784
#2,784
Stew Cook said:
If you have three of the five, or the four, whichever the number is supposed to be, on the same page, it's pretty much a lock. That's any easy calculation, and a good reason for Grassley to expedite the interviews.
Click to expand...

And provide full opportunity for the Dems to join in and ask questions. The refused completely - I'm guessing so they can say it wasn't a serious investigation and they don't believe what was said.

Still many twists and turns to go but it's hard to say Dems were really interested in getting to the truth.
 
#2,789
#2,789
volinbham said:
And provide full opportunity for the Dems to join in and ask questions. The refused completely - I'm guessing so they can say it wasn't a serious investigation and they don't believe what was said.

Still many twists and turns to go but it's hard to say Dems were really interested in getting to the truth.
Click to expand...

No. They were interested in a drive by hack job they knew would muck up the confirmation process and hopefully push the confirmation of a new Justice till after the midterms. There’s no evidence to examine short of what we may or may not hear from the few witnesses they’re trying to round up. The Dems have already tried and convicted Kavanaugh. Mission accomplished.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
#2,795
#2,795
1972 Grad said:
Is it just me, or does anyone else think that Kirsten Gillebrand an incredibly shrill, loud, obnoxious b!tch? Good God! She is ready to hang Kavanaugh.
Click to expand...

Yeah, she knows Ms Ford is telling the truth because....well she just is. That’s her evidence, an accusation. The garbage coming out of her mouth proves she can’t be taken seriously.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top