Kavanaugh Confirmation

#2,282
#2,282
evillawyer said:
Could be true, could be false. If we only had an investigatory bureau, like a federal one, that could ask to speak to her, maybe we could better assess her honesty.
Click to expand...

That's exactly what we need the FBI to be doing, running down all suspicious accusations. They have the time.

To me this would be more of a local LEO issue or MD state police.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#2,284
#2,284
evillawyer said:
Could be true, could be false. If we only had an investigatory bureau, like a federal one, that could ask to speak to her, maybe we could better assess her honesty.
Click to expand...
No matter how hard you clowns try, it wint delay the vote until the midterms. Your party is desperate and stupid. When ginsburgh dies, you are in serious trouble
 
#2,285
#2,285
evillawyer said:
As Vanity Fair reported yesterday, there are concerns in the WH of people corroborating Ford's story. One may have just surfaced.

Click to expand...


With you being a lawyer, I'm surprised you're so careless with a word like "corroborating."

Despite the length of the letter, the entirety of the "corroboration" is this sentence and a half: "This incident did happen. Many of us heard about it at school..."

Who did Ms King hear it from? What did that person know of the incident and how did he or she know it?

She spends more time talking about getting stood up by Mark Judge than she does "corroborating" the incident. I also find it interesting that she asked a guy to prom despite having heard that he participated in an attempted sexual assault.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 82_VOL_83, jaybird_1981, NorthDallas40 and 2 others
#2,286
#2,286
evillawyer said:
Could be true, could be false. If we only had an investigatory bureau, like a federal one, that could ask to speak to her, maybe we could better assess her honesty.
Click to expand...
Where is the crime here that lies within their jurisdiction counselor? They already concluded their background check. They took the info, appended it the file, and fwd’d to the WH as they should.

If only we had internet lawyers who understood the jurisdiction of our federal investigative departments.
 
#2,287
#2,287
bamawriter said:
With you being a lawyer, I'm surprised you're so careless with a word like "corroborating."

Despite the length of the letter, the entirety of the "corroboration" is this sentence and a half: "This incident did happen. Many of us heard about it at school..."

Who did Ms King hear it from? What did that person know of the incident and how did he or she know it?

She spends more time talking about getting stood up by Mark Judge than she does "corroborating" the incident. I also find it interesting that she asked a guy to prom despite having heard that he participated in an attempted sexual assault.
Click to expand...

She could have also gave some sort of time frame of when it happened.
 
#2,288
#2,288
evillawyer said:
Could be true, could be false. If we only had an investigatory bureau, like a federal one, that could ask to speak to her, maybe we could better assess her honesty.
Click to expand...

How many local level accusations are investigated by the FBI in your town? You prove, every day, that you are not an actual attorney.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols4sure, 82_VOL_83 and SLICKYINC
#2,289
#2,289
bamawriter said:
With you being a lawyer, I'm surprised you're so careless with a word like "corroborating."

Despite the length of the letter, the entirety of the "corroboration" is this sentence and a half: "This incident did happen. Many of us heard about it at school..."

Who did Ms King hear it from? What did that person know of the incident and how did he or she know it?

She spends more time talking about getting stood up by Mark Judge than she does "corroborating" the incident. I also find it interesting that she asked a guy to prom despite having heard that he participated in an attempted sexual assault.
Click to expand...

NOT
 
#2,293
#2,293
evillawyer said:
Could be true, could be false. If we only had an investigatory bureau, like a federal one, that could ask to speak to her, maybe we could better assess her honesty.
Click to expand...

how convenient. Let me guess, the FBI talks to her, Ford, K and Judge. We know nothing more than we do now and vote is scheduled. Suddenly another letter appears and Dems howl - this must be investigated by the FBI before we can vote. Rinse, repeat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#2,294
#2,294
hog88 said:
Odds are just as good or better that he didn't.

The way this came to light is 100% a Dem ploy to sling mud on the guy at the 11th hour. Otherwise why the polygraph in August?
Click to expand...

The polygraph doesn't do anything. It's a very subjective test. You can't rely on that
 
#2,296
#2,296
evillawyer said:
Don't see a whole lot of connection. Kavanaugh's being interviewed for a job currently. That's it. Like I said a few days ago, the senate can vote against him if they don't like his tie. Removing him from the DC circuit would/should require more evidence.
Click to expand...

The argument is he's not fit for a life time appointment on the court. If he's not fit of the SCOTUS, why is he fit for arguably the second highest court.

I'll ask another way - should he be fit for the DC Circuit if you think he's unfit for SCOTUS (which you've already accused him of being a liar under oath).
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
#2,297
#2,297
volinbham said:
The argument is he's not fit for a life time appointment on the court. If he's not fit of the SCOTUS, why is he fit for arguably the second highest court.

I'll ask another way - should he be fit for the DC Circuit if you think he's unfit for SCOTUS (which you've already accused him of being a liar under oath).
Click to expand...

One step at a time . Libs probably
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top