Kavanaugh Confirmation

[lawgator1]

KAVANAUGH’S MOTHER PRESIDED OVER FORECLOSURE OF ACCUSER’S FAMILY HOME. BUT THE FACTS ARE COMPLICATED

Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s mother, a state court judge in Maryland, was involved in the foreclosure of a property owned by the parents of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the California researcher who accused the Supreme Court nominee of sexual assault.

Maryland court records show that Judge Martha Kavanaugh issued several rulings in an action initiated in 1996 by the United Mortgage & Loan Investment Corp (UMLIC) to foreclose on a Potomac, Maryland, property owned by Ralph and Paula Blasey — Ford’s parents.

The foreclosure case took place some 15 years after the events Ford alleges with Brett Kavanaugh.

The case was adjudicated in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, though Martha Kavanaugh did not issue an order permitting seizure of the property. Rather, it appears the Blaseys reached a settlement with their bank, as Kavanaugh granted uncontested motions brought by UMLIC to dismiss the case.

Maryland land records show that Ralph and Paula Blasey purchased the property in 1977. The family currently retains ownership of the property via the Blasey Family Trust.

Public records reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation link Ford with the Potomac property, which is less than six miles away from the all-girls Holton-Arms School in Bethesda that she attended at the time of the alleged sexual assault.

Kavanaugh’s Mother Presided Over Foreclosure Of Accuser’s Family Home. But The Facts Are Complicated
​

I see people get mad at judges all the time. This is nothing. A real reach to say she is doing this because the judge's mother once presided over a case against her parents and issued some routine orders, and which they settled with the bank.

If this is the best you can do to assail her motive, that's not going to go very far.

 

[TennTom]

Sadly that is true. I had several females take advantage of me while being intoxicated. Lots of mental scarring.

Jesus, Hog made a funny. Bookmark this.

 

[NorthDallas40]

So has K specifically denied being at this party or event? Thus far his own statements I’ve read stated he made no such advance on a female ever during that time frame. And Judge has backed that up saying he never witnessed such an act.

So is there now an actual statement from K that on such and such date at such and such time I did not...

I mean he’s made the blanket “I never committed any such act” and doubled down on that today. So where is this specific event coming from? Hell even the accuser doesn’t remember?!

 

[NorthDallas40]

I see people get mad at judges all the time. This is nothing. A real reach to say she is doing this because the judge's mother once presided over a case against her parents and issued some routine orders, and which they settled with the bank.

If this is the best you can do to assail her motive, that's not going to go very far.

No it probably won’t. I’ll guess it comes up in questioning, is addressed, and then moved on.

 

[Orange_Crush]

I'm assuming you guys don't have daughters.

If its true, it's despicable, but really? Asking for proof? I have daughters and that has absolutely nothing to do with presumed innocence...














...counselor.

 

[volfanjustin]

Fair point

Is it also a "fair point" for people doubting her story when she can't remember when the party was, where it was or how she got home?

 

[FLVOL_79]

I see people get mad at judges all the time. This is nothing. A real reach to say she is doing this because the judge's mother once presided over a case against her parents and issued some routine orders, and which they settled with the bank.

If this is the best you can do to assail her motive, that's not going to go very far.

Dude. It isn't a reach. Sane people know lefties will literally do anything to make themselves feel like victims and scapegoat.

 

[FLVOL_79]

Is it also a "fair point" for people doubting her story when she can't remember when the party was, where it was or how she got home?

This one time at band camp...

 

[evillawyer]

So has K specifically denied being at this party or event? Thus far his own statements I’ve read stated he made no such advance on a female ever during that time frame. And Judge has backed that up saying he never witnessed such an act.

So is there now an actual statement from K that on such and such date at such and such time I did not...

I mean he’s made the blanket “I never committed any such act” and doubled down on that today. So where is this specific event coming from? Hell even the accuser doesn’t remember?!

Orrin Hatch came out and said that Kavanaugh told him he wasn't even at the party. No need to gild the lily if the defense is "I've never done this to this or any other women". Why assert facts that can be contested and potentially shown to be false, thereby casting doubt on your credibility?

 

[lawgator1]

If its true, it's despicable, but really? Asking for proof? I have faucets and that nd absolutely nothing to do with presumed innocence...

...counselor.

I was referring to their seeming insistence that the timing is sufficient proof of its falsity so as to dismiss it. It is not really a debatable point but that the trauma, humiliation, and stigma associated with such events causes most to go unreported at the time, if ever.

 

[CagleMtnVol]

"It started way back in third grade
I used to sit beside Emmylou Hayes
A pink dress, a matching bow, and her ponytail
She kissed me on the school bus but told me not to tell

(In today's PoundMeToo movement This was sexual assault!)

Next day I chased her around the playground
Cross the monkey bars to the merry-go-round

(In today's PoundMeToo movement This would be stalking or intimidation with intent to cause fear of physical, sexual or mental harm.)

And Emmylou got caught passing me a note
Before the teacher took it I read what she wrote

Do you love me do you want to be my friend
And if you do
Well then don't be afraid to take me by the hand
If you want to
I think this is how love goes
Check yes or no.

(In today's PoundMeToo movement This might be Blackmail?)"


It's a good thing George didn't release this song in the past two years the liberals would have it banned and he would be blacklisted!

 

[TennTom]

Orrin Hatch came out and said that Kavanaugh told him he wasn't even at the party. No need to gild the lily if the defense is "I've never done this to this or any other women". Why assert facts that can be contested and potentially shown to be false, thereby casting doubt on your credibility?

He's boxing himself in, if accurate. Not very wise.

 

[NorthDallas40]

Orrin Hatch came out and said that Kavanaugh told him he wasn't even at the party. No need to gild the lily if the defense is "I've never done this to this or any other women". Why assert facts that can be contested and potentially shown to be false, thereby casting doubt on your credibility?

Oh FFS you guys are now making statements for K and running with them. I listened to that whole audio. All that was stated is Hatch answering on specifics on “that party” in an overzealous support for K.

How about you reference Ks actual statements which he has been consistent on. Christ almighty...

 

[Orange_Crush]

I was referring to their seeming insistence that the timing is sufficient proof of its falsity so as to dismiss it. It is not really a debatable point but that the trauma, humiliation, and stigma associated with such events causes most to go unreported at the time, if ever.

Then why add the last quote, asking for proof, to the multi? It undermines any point your trying to make. And yes, like it or not, her delay in accusal hurts her credibility, as well as her failure to bring any semblance of detail to it.

So now, please answer, counselor. Proof? There won't be any. So you are pushing for him to be presumed guilty...



...counselor?

 

[NorthDallas40]

He's boxing himself in. Not very wise.

No he’s not. People are inserting statements in his mouth and boxing him in.

If anything he’s been consistent on what I’ve ever heard his own statements say. “I’ve never done such a thing. Not then or ever.”

 

[TennTom]

No he’s not. People are inserting statements in his mouth and boxing him in.

If anything he’s been consistent on what I’ve ever heard his own statements say. “I’ve never done such a thing. Not then or ever.”

I added, "if accurate". And that is true.

 

[NorthDallas40]

I added, "if accurate". And that is true.

I saw the edit after my post. Yes, if accurate. Thus far people are speaking for him and then holding it against him.

 

[Boston Vol]

Looks like Ford is already changing her story. Originally she told Wapo and her therapist that it was just her and four other boys at the party. Now, all of a sudden, she’s saying there was another girl there. Surely the Democrats would’ve be trying to create corroborating evidence would they?

 

[NorthDallas40]

Looks like Ford is already changing her story. Originally she told Wapo and her therapist that it was just her and four other boys at the party. Now, all of a sudden, she’s saying there was another girl there. Surely the Democrats would’ve be trying to create corroborating evidence would they?

Link? And wow if true.

 

[volfanjustin]

Looks like Ford is already changing her story. Originally she told Wapo and her therapist that it was just her and four other boys at the party. Now, all of a sudden, she’s saying there was another girl there. Surely the Democrats would’ve be trying to create corroborating evidence would they?

Probably trying to buy time to get one of her left wing friends to say she was there and saw it

 

[volinbham]

Looks like Ford is already changing her story. Originally she told Wapo and her therapist that it was just her and four other boys at the party. Now, all of a sudden, she’s saying there was another girl there. Surely the Democrats would’ve be trying to create corroborating evidence would they?

Here's the problem - while this is a perfectly reasonable and necessary line of questioning; any questioning of her story will be portrayed as victim blaming. It's going to be very difficult to probe (no pun) for details and try to find inconsistencies because of the perception. The way Durbin and Leahy went after K. will not be tolerated in questioning Ford. The spin machine is going to win the day here I'm afraid regardless of where the truth lies.

 

[Boston Vol]

Link? And wow if true.

Her attorney is now saying that there was another girl at the party, despite the fact that Ford told her therapist in 2012, and the Washington Post that it was just her and four boys.

 

[TennTom]

Looks like they have their letter, too. Dr. Ford’s allegations against Brett Kavanaugh are “all too consistent with stories we heard and lived while attending Holton,” they wrote.

Alumnae of girls school attended by Kavanaugh accuser circulate letter backing her

 

[volinbham]

I was referring to their seeming insistence that the timing is sufficient proof of its falsity so as to dismiss it. It is not really a debatable point but that the trauma, humiliation, and stigma associated with such events causes most to go unreported at the time, if ever.

Likewise, memories fade. If this was truly a repressed memory it's possible she's confusing K with someone else. Unfortunately pursuing that line inquiry will be deemed an attack on her.

 

[volinbham]

Looks like they have their letter, too.

Alumnae of girls school attended by Kavanaugh accuser circulate letter backing her

Seriously? People that don't know her now and didn't know her then are vouching for her?