Kavanaugh Confirmation

We're trekking farther into LaLa Land if we start letting people address the Senate and make allegations about a crime they claimed happened decades ago with absolutely no collaborating evidence. It's even worse that the nominee would have to defend himself over such a claim.

I understand why women don't come forward but it has to be part of the #Me Too movement that they start doing just that and not years later. We live in a time when most (I said most) people no longer blame the victim.
 
Now Dianne Feinstein faces questions over why she sat on Kavanaugh claims for weeks

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's last-minute revelation that Brett Kavanaugh had been accused of sexual assault by an acquaintance from high school in a July letter and she sat on it for weeks has created an opening for Republicans to salvage the conservative judge's nomination.

For nearly six weeks, Feinstein kept the allegations a secret, supposedly in an attempt to protect the woman who made the accusation. The woman is now known to be Palo Alto University Professor Christine Ford, who spoke on the record about the accusations over the weekend to The Washington Post.

Feinstein neither brought up the July 30, 2018 letter she received from Ford at a private session with Kavanaugh in her Capitol Hill office in late August or in a closed-door session with committee members earlier this month.

'She didn’t say anything in the confirmation hearing, she didn’t say anything in our confidential session with Judge Kavanaugh when the senators and the nominee met privately. And now, after it’s all over, she produces the letter,' Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana said on Fox News Sunday.

Feinstein faces questions over why she sat on Kavanaugh claims for weeks | Daily Mail Online
 
I wonder how many people remember an event that took place 36 years ago where absolutely nothing happened...mmmm.

Why do you bother posting in the current discussion in the thread where, for the most part, the rest of us are having a reasoned discussion of how this should be dealt with?
 
KAVANAUGH’S MOTHER PRESIDED OVER FORECLOSURE OF ACCUSER’S FAMILY HOME. BUT THE FACTS ARE COMPLICATED

Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s mother, a state court judge in Maryland, was involved in the foreclosure of a property owned by the parents of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the California researcher who accused the Supreme Court nominee of sexual assault.

Maryland court records show that Judge Martha Kavanaugh issued several rulings in an action initiated in 1996 by the United Mortgage & Loan Investment Corp (UMLIC) to foreclose on a Potomac, Maryland, property owned by Ralph and Paula Blasey — Ford’s parents.

The foreclosure case took place some 15 years after the events Ford alleges with Brett Kavanaugh.

The case was adjudicated in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, though Martha Kavanaugh did not issue an order permitting seizure of the property. Rather, it appears the Blaseys reached a settlement with their bank, as Kavanaugh granted uncontested motions brought by UMLIC to dismiss the case.

Maryland land records show that Ralph and Paula Blasey purchased the property in 1977. The family currently retains ownership of the property via the Blasey Family Trust.

Public records reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation link Ford with the Potomac property, which is less than six miles away from the all-girls Holton-Arms School in Bethesda that she attended at the time of the alleged sexual assault.

Kavanaugh’s Mother Presided Over Foreclosure Of Accuser’s Family Home. But The Facts Are Complicated
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
Kavanaugh Accuser Signed Letter Fighting Trump Border Enforcement

The woman accusing President Trump’s United States Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of a “rape attempt” when the two were in high school previously signed a letter fighting Trump’s “Zero Tolerance” policy at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)—an open borders advocacy organization—letter was written and sent to Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen and Attorney General Jeff Sessions in June.

Christine Blasey Ford, a psychology professor, signed the ACLU letter as “Christine Blasey Ph.D. Psychologist,” signing off on statements that accused Trump of using southern border enforcement to “traumatize children” and claimed the Zero Tolerance policy was “violating fundamental human rights.”

The ACLU letter, signed by Blasey, demanded the Trump administration stop the border enforcement policy, claiming the enforcement measure was an “intentional infliction of pain on children,” calling it “inhumane.”

Read the full letter here:


Kavanaugh Accuser Signed Letter Fighting Trump Border Enforcement

If you can just now find evidence of her eating organic tofu and sprouted bread she's going down in flames.
 
KAVANAUGH’S MOTHER PRESIDED OVER FORECLOSURE OF ACCUSER’S FAMILY HOME. BUT THE FACTS ARE COMPLICATED

Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s mother, a state court judge in Maryland, was involved in the foreclosure of a property owned by the parents of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, the California researcher who accused the Supreme Court nominee of sexual assault.

Maryland court records show that Judge Martha Kavanaugh issued several rulings in an action initiated in 1996 by the United Mortgage & Loan Investment Corp (UMLIC) to foreclose on a Potomac, Maryland, property owned by Ralph and Paula Blasey — Ford’s parents.

The foreclosure case took place some 15 years after the events Ford alleges with Brett Kavanaugh.

The case was adjudicated in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, though Martha Kavanaugh did not issue an order permitting seizure of the property. Rather, it appears the Blaseys reached a settlement with their bank, as Kavanaugh granted uncontested motions brought by UMLIC to dismiss the case.

Maryland land records show that Ralph and Paula Blasey purchased the property in 1977. The family currently retains ownership of the property via the Blasey Family Trust.

Public records reviewed by The Daily Caller News Foundation link Ford with the Potomac property, which is less than six miles away from the all-girls Holton-Arms School in Bethesda that she attended at the time of the alleged sexual assault.

Kavanaugh’s Mother Presided Over Foreclosure Of Accuser’s Family Home. But The Facts Are Complicated
Shows motive as well as her being a hard core leftist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
Lawyer for Kavanaugh accuser downplayed sexual misconduct allegations against Clinton, Franken

1537201084279.jpg


Attorney Debra Katz made the rounds Monday on morning television to argue her client’s sexual misconduct allegations against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh should be taken seriously, an appeal accepted even by the White House.

But while her client's claims have raised bipartisan concerns about Kavanaugh, Katz, a longtime Democratic donor known for representing sexual harassment accusers, also has a history of downplaying or dismissing accusations made by women against Democratic politicians -- including former President Bill Clinton and former Minnesota Sen. Al Franken.

“Paula Jones' suit is very, very, very weak,” Katz said on CNN’s “Talkback Live” in March 1998 in a discussion about Jones’ claims against Clinton, according to a show transcript. “She's alleged one incident that took place in a hotel room that, by her own testimony, lasted 10 to 12 minutes. She suffered no repercussions in the workplace.”

Jones, who worked as a government employee in Arkansas, accused Clinton, while governor of Arkansas in 1991, of propositioning her for sex. Clinton settled a lawsuit with Jones in 1998.

Katz, in other media appearances first highlighted by Townhall, suggested Jones didn’t have much of a case.

“Clearly a one-time incident that took place in 10 to 12 minutes, she was not forced to have sex, she left on her own volition, the courts increasingly are finding that that is not enough to create a sexually hostile work environment claim,” Katz said in April 1998, according to a transcript of CBS Evening News.

''If a woman came to me with a similar fact pattern, that is someone in the company above her propositioned her but only once and she suffered no tangible job detriment,'' Katz told The New York Times in 1998, ''I would probably tell her that I'm sorry, it's unfair, but you don't have a case.''

Katz, speaking to the newspaper, added, ''If it's one time, it has to be severe, almost a sexual assault, not just a touching of somebody's breast or buttocks or even forceful kissing.”

In more recent years, Katz also downplayed the wave of sexual misconduct allegations against Franken, who denied some of the allegations but eventually resigned from the Senate over them.

"Context is relevant,” Katz said of Franken, who was a comedian before his election to the Senate. “He did not do this as a member of the U.S. Senate. He did this in his capacity of someone who was still functioning as an entertainer.”

Katz is now representing Christine Ford, a registered Democrat who has accused Kavanaugh, while in high school more than 30 years ago, of pinning her down, trying to remove her bathing suit and putting his hand over her mouth when she attempted to scream.

Lawyer for Kavanaugh accuser downplayed sexual misconduct allegations against Clinton, Franken
 
We're trekking farther into LaLa Land if we start letting people address the Senate and make allegations about a crime they claimed happened decades ago with absolutely no collaborating evidence. It's even worse that the nominee would have to defend himself over such a claim.

I understand why women don't come forward but it has to be part of the #Me Too movement that they start doing just that and not years later. We live in a time when most (I said most) people no longer blame the victim.


Wait, what? We live in a time where most people no longer blame the victim, yet here you are blaming her for not reporting it then?

All you are doing is reinforcing every negative stereotype of the uncaring GOP partisan you can muster. Conway had it right this morning. Sheeesz, even Trump is refraining from his Twitter diarrhea and realizing there is no easy answer to this issue.

The accusation is out there, it is serious, it will be heard and considered. I'm sure she will be asked tough questions about the timing, and folks will either accept her explanation or they won't. Let people judge for themselves whether it is true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TennTom
Advertisement

Back
Top