Kavanaugh Confirmation

#602
#602
LouderVol said:
what? back in the good ole days they used to beat each other with sticks and duel the president.
Click to expand...
Bring back those days. The only problem will be finding which bathroom the Liberals are hiding in. After that, we know who will have the guns and who won't.
 
#604
#604
BowlBrother85 said:
That would be fine if it happens.
Click to expand...
giphy.gif
 
#605
#605
BowlBrother85 said:
That is apples to oranges...
Click to expand...
It was dead accurate though. The only reason McConnell was able to maneuver the way he did was by invoking the "Reid Rule" and the " Biden Rule".

In a perfect world, Garlsmd should've gotten a hearing, but what happened was a result of shortsighted politics coming back to bite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol
#607
#607
GAVol said:
It was dead accurate though. The only reason McConnell was able to maneuver the way he did was by invoking the "Reid Rule" and the " Biden Rule".

In a perfect world, Garlsmd should've gotten a hearing, but what happened was a result of shortsighted politics coming back to bite.
Click to expand...
There wasn't a "Biden Rule". That is simply words spoken over 20 years earlier toward an action which had never actually been taken... and the "Reid Rule" has absolutely nothing to do with blocking a Supreme Court vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
#609
#609
BowlBrother85 said:
There wasn't a "Biden Rule". That is simply words spoken over 20 years earlier toward an action which had never actually been taken... and the "Reid Rule" has absolutely nothing to do with blocking a Supreme Court vote.
Click to expand...
I know Biden was a floor speech... and I know Reid was originally dealing with federal judges. The point is, if they'd both just followed Senate rules, there'd be no unintended consequences and the Garland hearing would've happened.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandman 423
#610
#610
BowlBrother85 said:
There wasn't a "Biden Rule". That is simply words spoken over 20 years earlier toward an action which had never actually been taken... and the "Reid Rule" has absolutely nothing to do with blocking a Supreme Court vote.
Click to expand...
Yeah, the "Reid Rule" was invoked to get Gorsuch on the bench.
 
#611
#611
BowlBrother85 said:
There wasn't a "Biden Rule". That is simply words spoken over 20 years earlier toward an action which had never actually been taken... and the "Reid Rule" has absolutely nothing to do with blocking a Supreme Court vote.
Click to expand...

MG should have gotten a vote but you can't deny the Biden position was to not process a SCOTUS nominee during an election year.

The Reid Rule applied to every other judicial nomination - extending it to SCOTUS is the natural conclusion. Reid made the bed, McConnell simply tucked in the last corner.
 
#612
#612
volinbham said:
MG should have gotten a vote but you can't deny the Biden position was to not process a SCOTUS nominee during an election year.

The Reid Rule applied to every other judicial nomination - extending it to SCOTUS is the natural conclusion. Reid made the bed, McConnell simply tucked in the last corner.
Click to expand...

And the Republic gets short sheeted.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinbham
#613
#613
volinbham said:
MG should have gotten a vote but you can't deny the Biden position was to not process a SCOTUS nominee during an election year.

The Reid Rule applied to every other judicial nomination - extending it to SCOTUS is the natural conclusion. Reid made the bed, McConnell simply tucked in the last corner.
Click to expand...
Just prior to Biden saying that the Democrats could have easily justified blocking the nomination of Clarence Thomas (a little over a year before the election) but they did not. And George Bush was allowed to have a very young and conservative justice on the bench who never asks any questions, sleeps most of the time and picks his nose while fantasizing about the escapades of Long Dong Silver.
 
#617
#617
  • Like
Reactions: AirVol
#619
#619
SpaceCoastVol said:
He will fit better in the SCOTUS. Get used to the thought.
Click to expand...
I think the left is finally coming to realize that the Kavanaugh nomination spells disaster for their futures. They've been too busy being pro criminal and working hard on those tranny bathrooms that they almost let Trumps greatest victory happen without a fight. It will still happen though even with all the fake leaking, planted protesters, and "child survivor" testimony. They put all their eggs in the impeachment basket and forgot about SCOTUS. OOPS!
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, Carl Pickens, BigOrangeTrain and 2 others
#620
#620
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeTrain, volfanhill, SLICKYINC and 2 others
#621
#621
FLVOL_79 said:
I think the left is finally coming to realize that the Kavanaugh nomination spells disaster for their futures. They've been too busy being pro criminal and working hard on those tranny bathrooms that they almost let Trumps greatest victory happen without a fight. It will still happen though even with all the fake leaking, planted protesters, and "child survivor" testimony. They put all their eggs in the impeachment basket and forgot about SCOTUS. OOPS!
Click to expand...
The next nomination is going to be the best entertainment since election night. I don't care who it is. I hope he nominates Garland. They will still lose their ****ing minds
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens, HeadVol77 and FLVOL_79
#622
#622
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens, FLVOL_79 and NorthDallas40
#623
#623
SpaceCoastVol said:
The next nomination is going to be the best entertainment since election night. I don't care who it is. I hope he nominates Garland. They will still lose their ****ing minds
Click to expand...
I never even contemplated 3 nominations. I fully expected Trump to get his two picks on the court to seal the fate of libtards for decades. 3 picks? That would be glorious.

Has the left flipped out about these people being White males yet? Or are they saving that for their last ditch attempt to stifle progress?
 
#624
#624
#625
#625
FLVOL_79 said:
I never even contemplated 3 nominations. I fully expected Trump to get his two picks on the court to seal the fate of libtards for decades. 3 picks? That would be glorious.

Has the left flipped out about these people being White males yet? Or are they saving that for their last ditch attempt to stifle progress?
Click to expand...
Ruth Vadar is 85. She can't live/function for another 6 years at that high a level. Hell she can't stay awake NOW.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens, tumscalcium and FLVOL_79
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top