Kavanaugh Confirmation

#9,152
#9,152
evillawyer said:
You can reopen it based on new information that was not available to the FBI first time around. This is beyond debate at this point.
Click to expand...

An uncorroborated allegation of an event said to have happened 36 years ago while Kavanaugh was in high school is "new information" worthy of an investigation?
 
#9,153
#9,153
LSU-SIU said:
Maybe so, but so what. There is nobody to talk to... all they do is take statements, generally speaking. They're not going to go look for a crime scene.
Click to expand...

There are plenty of people to talk to. You lie to the FBI, and the DOJ can charge you. You submit a letter to the Judiciary Committee and you're lying, I think they would have to make a criminal referral, which of course they're not going to do here.
 
#9,156
#9,156
LSU-SIU said:
Well... it would be if they had proof of him recently doing a bunch of public events, the book was published 14 years ago. But yeah, saying you avoid public speaking is not the same as I never publicly speak. LOL

Evillawyer is somehow a very fitting name though, just saying. :)
Click to expand...

If he's a lawyer.
 
#9,158
#9,158
evillawyer said:
If "boof" means fart, the sentence in the yearbook would mean "have you farted yet." With any intellectual honesty, do any of you want to maintain that judge and Kavanaugh were asking each other whether they had farted yet? Seems much more likely they were using one of the accepted meaning (anal sex or consuming alcohol anally).
Click to expand...
Youre analyzing a 17 year olds year book in order to take over the last 30 years of his life. Think about that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#9,159
#9,159
evillawyer said:
There are plenty of people to talk to. You lie to the FBI, and the DOJ can charge you. You submit a letter to the Judiciary Committee and you're lying, I think they would have to make a criminal referral, which of course they're not going to do here.
Click to expand...


This isn't rocket science. The committee is the investigation body... they are voting soon to move it along in the process, they don't have to.... which is what you are basically asking... they can/could have left it in the committee.

I'm not really sure what your issue is, I mean do you have like something wrong with you that would help me understand why you don't understand these simple concepts? Brain injury, medication, drugs, etc.?
 
#9,168
#9,168
Im only hoping for a K victory for the gnashing of teeth and belligerent foamy mouthed flailing we will see from the libtards afterwards.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tennvols77
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top