Yep. Tee's senior year was much better than his junior year. Tee also didn't get to play much until his junior season. Dobbs, as a result of poor QBs in front of him and injuries to others, became a starter midway through his freshman season. It's hard to compare
No it's not. Tee had the benefit of sitting and learning for two years from David Cutcliffe and Peyton Manning (Dobbs had Bajakian and Worley). And as mentioned before, he had a much better football team around him across the board.
Dobbs was thrown into the fire well before he was ready, twice when the plan was the redshirt him, let him develop, put some weight on, better learn the offense. While he got some trial by fire experience his first two years for sure, neither time was he fully ready for it....could've gone either way, certainly confidence-wise, and yet he kept getting better, eventually thriving.
And Tee? Well, after the benefit of 2 years of development with Cut and Peyton, had his better season (though it was wildly inconsistent) as a junior, and regressed as a senior, even while not being asked to do nearly as much as Josh, who was all-everything in our offense the last two years.
Jmo, but I think the easy comparison is there to be made. Quick experiment, and be honest....who fares better, Dobbs on the 1998 and 1999 teams with all that talent around him, not asked to be everything in the offense, able to rely on Lewis, Henry and company, with Price and Wilson on the edges..... Or Martin, on the 2015 and 2016 teams, behind a porous OL, with limited talent at wide out, asked to be everything?