Your anger is entertaining. And moronic. And a few quick names come to mind. Cassel and garappolo. Argument over. Good talk. In 08 cassell started 15 games. He put up better yardage and QB rating than Brady averaged his first four years with the pats. I won’t look up Jimmy G. Your obviously such a NE fan that I’m sure you saw him play pretty well on the field as well. Cassell went on to be pretty terrible with everyone else with the exception of a good year. Jimmy G now plays in a mediocre offense on a SF team that was leading the way with their defense. But please don’t let these facts get in the way of your fanboy opinion. He’s definitely a QB great. Super Bowls are great. But Tom Brady didn’t carry people on his back to super bowls. Hell Eli has a few SB but I would hardly call him elite. Defenses were great when he was winning. They’ve had great coaching, defense, and supporting casts for him. Not so much this year and look what happened. Other quarterbacks have did as much or more with much less help. Brady had a pool of receiving/rushing talent around him to help for many years. Now all the NE fans are boohooing because Brady doesn’t have 4 offensive studs to throw to. Most teams don’t but have to make it work. Go Titans.
Honestly not much of a BB fan. But I’m definitely not a lebron fan. They play quite differently so it’s hard to compare them. They’re both great. However I did enjoy when athletes didn’t think they were politicians. That alone makes me lean towards MJ. Tannehill owns Brady. I’ll just leave that here. Don’t you have some balls to deflate? Games to illegally tape?
You're great at making unsubstantiated claims with, "evidence," that is anything but; when it comes to actually making a cogent, sound point.
The Cassel argument is far and away the most risible of any that has been made by Peyton homers regarding Brady. See if you can follow here, genius: The Patriots went 18-1 in 2007 with Brady. With the same offensive personnel in 2008 but Cassel as QB, they went 11-5. Go ahead and try to argue that a seven-game dropoff in wins is not significant, or that it doesn't obliterate your argument.
Garropolo has won exactly zero Super Bowls. I would wager all the money you made last year (which is probably a heck of a lot less than I made) that he won't win six, or even three. He has a coach that is regarded by many as one of the handful of best in the NFL.
Eli won two SBs, not, "a few." Nice try on attempting to give him more than he has to support your execrable argument.
No less than Steve Young has commented more than once, as have other HOF quarterbacks, that Brady, over most of his career and not just here and there, has done more with less than any other QB. Peyton for several years had not one but two HOF WRs and a HOF RB, all at the same time, at his disposal; never for one quarter of one game has Brady had that kind of talent. He had two years of Moss, only one of which was Moss still in his prime; he had Gronk; he had a good slot receiver that also makes a lot of drops (led the league in that stat this year). The SB a year ago was the first time that Edelman and Gronk had ever even both played in the same SB - one of them was always hurt in previous seasons.
"Other quarterbacks have did [sic] as much or more with less help." This sentence alone proves how much of a liar you are. The last I checked, no other quarterback has won six Super Bowls, or even five; and I already disproved your laughable, dishonest claim that Brady has had more talent than other quarterbacks, which is as far from the truth as any human being could ever type. Also, it should be, "have done," not, "have did."