Jerry Colquitt critical of Dooley on starting Worley

I am stunned at how someone so lost out on reality has been given a guru status. Believe me brother, you are no guru. Not in this sport anyway.

Colquitt's comments were inappropriate at best. For you not to realize it shows your lack of maturity. It has nothing to do with supporting Dooley over the University. Those claims you keep making are abusurd and downright stupid.

Go bow down at your alter of the Losing coach we currently have.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
My devotion is to the University over the coach. I'm a UT fan not a member of a cult like many of you on here.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Honestly, a lot of times, being a huge college football fan is being a member of a cult.

You're devoted to the University. Derek Dooley, as of now, is the guy at the University you're devoted to. :hi:
 
4622244885
 
Honestly, a lot of times, being a huge college football fan is being a member of a cult.

You're devoted to the University. Derek Dooley, as of now, is the guy at the University you're devoted to. :hi:

But he is not above reproach and just because a fan or a former player disagrees with him they shouldn't be chastised. And no, a healthy fan is NOT cult like.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
But he is not above reproach and just because a fan or a former player disagrees with him they shouldn't be chastised. And no, a healthy fan is NOT cult like.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Supporting a head coach isn't cult-like.
 
Go bow down at your alter of the Losing coach we currently have.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Typical response from someone incapable of healthy debate. Nowhere could it be interpreted that I am choosing Dooley over the University. I just know the guy has a good plan and needs time to implement it. You, on the other hand, are like most knee-jerk, "what have you done for me lately" reactionaries. You simply don't know enough to make an intelligent comment so you make stupid ones based on a misguided, predetermined notion. Perhaps you were given that guru status as a joke. Can't imagine any other reason.

Welcome to ignore status, little boy
 
Supporting a head coach isn't cult-like.

That's right. But the level and depths of devotion many of you show DD is far above and beyond healthy.
If were y'all I'd be careful drinking Kool-Aid from DD and his staff. He has an almost Jim Jones hold on many of y'all.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
Typical response from someone incapable of healthy debate. Nowhere could it be interpreted that I am choosing Dooley over the University. I just know the guy has a good plan and needs time to implement it. You, on the other hand, are like most knee-jerk, "what have you done for me lately" reactionaries. You simply don't know enough to make an intelligent comment so you make stupid ones based on a misguided, predetermined notion. Perhaps you were given that guru status as a joke. Can't imagine any other reason.

Welcome to ignore status, little boy

You like many goobs before you will disapear soon. Just like this current head coach.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
What's your problem with Dooley, really?

His performance as head coach. I have zero issues with him personally, it's all professionally related. He is a good guy it seems. But there's no doubt in my mind he is in over his head. And he damned sure isn't above criticism like so many of you act.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
I just think you can't judge him on 2 years, one of which his 4 best players weren't available on an already young football team.

Next year is a more fair judgment, which is why I've reserved mine, despite having high hopes for the guy.

Time will tell, I guess.
 
His performance as head coach. I have zero issues with him personally, it's all professionally related. He is a good guy it seems. But there's no doubt in my mind he is in over his head. And he damned sure isn't above criticism like so many of you act.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

Sure is "end of the world" in here.
 
His performance as head coach. I have zero issues with him personally, it's all professionally related. He is a good guy it seems. But there's no doubt in my mind he is in over his head. And he damned sure isn't above criticism like so many of you act.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

There's no coach in the country that would led the Vols to victories over LSU and Alabama this season. If you disagree with that then there is no doubt in my mind that you are in way over your head as a Volnation poster.
 
Dooley is the best coach in the world until he has had a full three years...After that he is open for criticism..Until then, don't handicap him by throwing out every possible opinion of him you have..he may turn out to be iconic for TN and then how many will admit you were calling for his head after 1 and 1/2 seasons...you guys make as much sense as Wall Street protesters..go get a job!
 
I guess Jerry wanted to see more of the disaster that is Matt Simms under center. He's overlooking the fact this team was going to quit on Simms. No one would say that, but play like he has been playing and you would witness it. The change had to be made, there wasn't a choice.

100% agree!!!!!!!
 
What will he say if Worley comes out and has a breakout performance and gets SEC Freshman of the Week?

You know the parallels are actually really striking. Manning eventually fell into that job that year, and he was the third team QB just like Worley. Of course it is ridiculous and unfair to compare any QB to Manning, but I just thought it was a funny coincidence. Perhaps Worley getting the job reminds JC of Manning taking his in 94.
 
Look idiot. Please show me where I bashed Peyton like yougoobs have JC? You can't because y'all have an almost Cult like devotion to Dooley.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

I don't really care what his opinion is; however, it is beyond asinine to even hint at the idea of Dooley starting a freshman only to use him as a scapegoat. That's not bashing, that's my opinion. Learn the difference, poo poo head (or whatever name that comes out next from your uneducated mouth).
 
Last edited:
His performance as head coach.
What performance would that be?

Taking over a dismal La Tech program and improving it? Taking over an even worse UT program relatively speaking and at the very least improving its roster by a significant measure?

Give an example of a reasonable standard you have judged his actual performance by that justifies calling him an overall failure.

I have zero issues with him personally, it's all professionally related. He is a good guy it seems. But there's no doubt in my mind he is in over his head.
Rationally considering where he started from and the adversity this current team has suffered from Jackson to Bray... who wouldn't seem over their head at this point?

And he damned sure isn't above criticism like so many of you act.
Posted via VolNation Mobile

No. He isn't. However he is NOT worthy of condemnation at this point as you have constantly done. Criticism should at least have some tethering to the reality of the situation he inherited, right?

Again, give a rational criticism that considers all the factors and let's discuss it.
 
Advertisement



Back
Top