Iran

#22,778
#22,778
BeardedVol said:
Restating your bizarre fantasies is not helping you, and it's definitely not making you look like less of a sanctimonious hypocrite given your posts about being "stalked".
Click to expand...
Just corrected your initial partial truth post as another poster had responded to it with “?”. Not worried about helping your view of me. Couldn’t give a flip.
 
#22,781
#22,781
#22,786
#22,786
MontyPython said:
So Trump is NOT going to blockade all ships passing through the Strait huh?

He said he is.

So if Chinese oil ships don't stop, then... we do nothing, correct?
Click to expand...

Chinese tankers do not have military escort in the region. You believe a tanker will just disregard US military warnings and ram a US warship?

That Chinese captain has a responsibility for his ship and crew, any sensible commander won’t be irrational in that situation.
 
#22,787
#22,787
W.TN.Orange Blood said:
So who would you like to see leading the way if Trump (your dream) wasn't.
Click to expand...
I’d like to see Doug Burgum, Trump’s Sec of Interior, get the GOP nomination. If Thomas Massie ran I would consider him as he’s one of the few fiscal conservatives left in DC. But that’s much further behind Burgum.

Thus far I’d never support Vance he’s an empty suit clown thus far. And while I still like Rubio the stink of this admin is starting to attach to him. But today I’d still vote for him.

Let me guess who you’d want. Trump 2028 AMIRITE? 😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: Delmar
#22,789
#22,789
NorthDallas40 said:
I’d like to see Doug Burgum, Trump’s Sec of Interior, get the GOP nomination. If Thomas Massie ran I would consider him as he’s one of the few fiscal conservatives left in DC. But that’s much further behind Burgum.

Thus far I’d never support Vance he’s an empty suit clown thus far. And while I still like Rubio the stink of this admin is starting to attach to him. But today I’d still vote for him.

Let me guess who you’d want. Trump 2028 AMIRITE? 😂
Click to expand...
We'll have to wait and see how things trudge along..
 
#22,790
#22,790
ETV said:
Chinese tankers do not have military escort in the region. You believe a tanker will just disregard US military warnings and ram a US warship?

That Chinese captain has a responsibility for his ship and crew, any sensible commander won’t be irrational in that situation.
Click to expand...
Monty is not aware of that. He's too busy ranting & raving & foaming at the mouth.
 
#22,792
#22,792
ETV said:
Chinese tankers do not have military escort in the region. You believe a tanker will just disregard US military warnings and ram a US warship?

That Chinese captain has a responsibility for his ship and crew, any sensible commander won’t be irrational in that situation.
Click to expand...
Do you think one of our US warships will put itself in front of a Chinese tanker?

Nope.

Do you think the United States military would board a Chinese tanker going through the Strait?

Nope.

This is all just another elaborate ruse by our moron president.

Watch how the rest of the world reacts tomorrow. Oil will probably skyrocket and the stock market will tank bigly.

Only a complete and utter moron would believe any of this stupidity at this point.

Good old Trump will probably publicly flip-flop tomorrow when the markets go down 1000 or 2000 points.
 
Last edited:
#22,793
#22,793
MontyPython said:
Do you think one of our US warships will put itself in front of a Chinese tanker?

Nope.

Do you think the United States military would board a Chinese tanker going through the Strait?

Nope.

This is all just another elaborate ruse by our moron president.

Watch how the rest of the world reacts tomorrow. Oil will probably skyrocketing and the stock market will tank bigly.

So don’t believe my take on it…
Click to expand...
Good to know you've been sitting in on all these closed door private meetings so as to inform everyone here what's really going on. 🤣 Thanks.
 
Last edited:
#22,795
#22,795
VAVol85 said:
The intent of the blockade is to stop ships that have bribed Iran for safe passage, not to prevent commercial traffic.
Click to expand...
The main point is to stop Iran from being able to sell its oil. Choke the regime off financially. I'm betting the extremists dictators have more patience for this game of chicken then we will. Financial and political pressure will be more of an issue for Trump than the Mullahs
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol, Pennheel, NashVol11 and 3 others
#22,796
#22,796
MontyPython said:
Do you think one of our US warships will put itself in front of a Chinese tanker?

Nope.

Do you think the United States military would board a Chinese tanker going through the Strait?

Nope.

This is all just another elaborate ruse by our moron president.

Watch how the rest of the world reacts tomorrow. Oil will probably skyrocket and the stock market will tank bigly.

Only a complete and utter moron would believe any of this stupidity at this point.

Good old Trump will probably publicly flip-flop tomorrow when the markets go down 1000 or 2000 points.
Click to expand...
Just like his threat to destroy all of Iran, he won't actually follow through (most of the time, that's for the better).

The world is catching on. His saber-rattling and bleating and yelling is getting us nowhere fast with anyone, and is making us weaker around the world. And for what? He's sacrificing America to cover for his pedophile donors and friends, and possibly his own pedophile family.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
#22,797
#22,797
volfanhill said:
The main point is to stop Iran from being able to sell its oil. Choke the regime off financially. I'm betting the extremists dictators have more patience for this game of chicken then we will. Financial and political pressure will be more of an issue for Trump than the Mullahs
Click to expand...
Pressure is a benefit and rallying point to religious extremists, which is how all Iranians have been painted by this low-IQ administration. Why they can't follow their own logic is beyond me.
 
#22,798
#22,798
volfanhill said:
The main point is to stop Iran from being able to sell its oil. Choke the regime off financially. I'm betting the extremists dictators have more patience for this game of chicken then we will. Financial and political pressure will be more of an issue for Trump than the Mullahs
Click to expand...
It’s another throw 💩 at the wall and see what sticks since less than a week ago we allowed Iranian tankers unimpeded passage
 
  • Like
Reactions: MontyPython
#22,799
#22,799
DinkinFlicka said:
Richard, I think we both know this comparison is ass at best.
Click to expand...
It's more for the libertarian view of "who are we to tell homicidal maniacs they can't have weapons to use against us"

While it may be correct on a "let them be no authority should exist" spectrum, the facts are there are very legal and moral reasons why we do not allow them to

NOTE - this does not mean i support war on Iran as I have stated this whole time from the beginning, but to jibly say "who are we to keep Iran from nuclear weapons" is pedantic and misguided at best
 
#22,800
#22,800
MontyPython said:
Do you think one of our US warships will put itself in front of a Chinese tanker?

Nope.

Do you think the United States military would board a Chinese tanker going through the Strait?

Nope.

This is all just another elaborate ruse by our moron president.

Watch how the rest of the world reacts tomorrow. Oil will go skyrocketing probably and the stock market will tank bigly.

So don’t believe my take on it…
Click to expand...

It’s called a blockade for a reason. Whether or not it is enforced and to what extent, remains to be seen. Xi is no dummy and he doesn’t want a conflict with the US that’s not on their terms and no where close to their backyard (Taiwan).

I seriously doubt Trump is the one who proposed the idea of a blockade at all, since it’s not likely he’s thinking that far in advance. The joint chiefs and/or Hegseth may have floated the idea.

You’re correct in that we’ll see what tomorrow brings. Oil prices will probably waitrise and the markets have been extremely volatile lately.

So no, I don’t believe your possible WW3 take on it.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top