ButchPlz
We do a little trollin'
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2014
- Messages
- 22,358
- Likes
- 44,293
Of course they would be, but we launched an attack on a country where all of the participants are on drastically different pages on how long, how aggressive, and how thorough the attack should be. Hell, they can't even agree on the reason for all this in the first place.You could be right. The politics of that would be really bad, though.
Could be wrong but I believe that’s the only way regime change will happen. I don’t think the Iranian populace can overcome the Iranian military by themselves. And there are plenty of Iranians that actually support the existing nuts in power.We're going to end up in a sad game of chicken where someone is going to have to deploy boots on the ground. Unfortunately I think that's going to be us.
Well, and like I posted earlier, the ones in the US seem to expect us to finish the job.Could be wrong but I believe that’s the only way regime change will happen. I don’t think the Iranian populace can overcome the Iranian military by themselves. And there are plenty of Iranians that actually support the existing nuts in power.
Triple down on stupidity.They're not there from what I find. Odds are it's another 'there are no Christians in Gaza' figment of your imagination.
Or hydrogen. In either case I wish we could get more behind dependence on oil not being inextricably tied to being "green" and flat out saying "we can start divesting ourselves from oil dependence and that's a good thing".Switching electric vehicles could speed the demise of our political interest in the region.
They wonder why I get hostile about certain people posting like cheerleaders for this stuff.We are just such a good, loving country we love to spread "democracy" to these feral people ya know. If that means our kids have to die in the desert across the world then so be it.
