UTCVol
Soon.
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2008
- Messages
- 15,647
- Likes
- 3,887
I mean, if we had barely scraped by those teams then I could at least halfway understand it. But those games were never in doubt.
Uhm this was the question you asked?
So obviously Martin CAN write up a set play.
Toss to Stokes in corner, gets doubled, man cuts, Stokes dumps him the ball, someone else has to help or we have a lay up.
It's a pretty good play call since Michigan was betting on McRae getting the inbounds.
If you are calling a play to get a foul, not a basket, and relying on the refs to win you the game, you are setting yourself up to fail.
McRae and Richardson got us back in the game. Get one of them the ball moving towards the basket. The play call is a much bigger issue in my mind than the foul. Putting Stokes in that spot after he'd been shut down most of the game is a low percentage play.
As for the foul call, I would say the Michigan player flopped. However he was set so it wasn't a block, IMO. Close call so I'm not really overly concerned with that.
but that's not what happen... Stokes drove it... on a double team. If he was looking to dish if the double team came he would of found a wide open McRae... he wasn't looking for that tho.
It wasn't a flop... he was set, Stokes ran him over. All of the announcers agreed with the call.
It's not Stokes fault... CCM's gotta put his players in better positions to win. Feel for them.
in hypothetical world, I have McRae throwing it in to Stokes and coming for a handoff to take it to the rim using Stokes to pick his man and Stokes can follow on the baseline for a cleanup or pass.
Bad foul call, and Mcrae was up top. Now that I think about it, I wonder if Stokes was gathering the ball to pass to Mcrae when he was hacked by the help D
Yes if he is guarded by Michigan center who is not expected to be able to move his feet to stay with Stokes facing him that far from the rim - most likely scenario is you get 2 ft's in that situation to win the game. The problem is that the ref did not do what most refs do in this situation - give benefit of the doubt to the offensive (star) player.
With 9 seconds left the player who catches the inbounds is going to get doubled. Stokes is the best player we have at passing out of a double team. We were going to end up with a really good look if Stokes didn't push a little too far into the lane and the ref didn't go full retard.
Also Michigan was denying Richardson and McRae on the inbounds obviously. Only way to get them the ball would have been far away from the basket and probably running away from it. Would have been a lot harder to get a good look.
in hypothetical world, I have McRae throwing it in to Stokes and coming for a handoff to take it to the rim using Stokes to pick his man and Stokes can follow on the baseline for a cleanup or pass.
Bad foul call, and Mcrae was up top. Now that I think about it, I wonder if Stokes was gathering the ball to pass to Mcrae when he was hacked by the help D
If you watch the video jordan is starting to cut towards the basket, and Jarnell appeared to be gathering the ball. Well never know, but it looked like a dump off was coming to a cutting Jordy.
BUT HE DIDN'T PASS IT. It would have been brilliant IF he passed it. But he didn't so one has to think the pass wasn't a part of the play. McRae didn't even crash when the double team came. Why? It wasn't the play.
BUT HE DIDN'T PASS IT. It would have been brilliant IF he passed it. But he didn't so one has to think the pass wasn't a part of the play. McRae didn't even crash when the double team came. Why? It wasn't the play.