orangetd88
Agent of Chaos
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2003
- Messages
- 4,270
- Likes
- 477
Again showing you have no clue of what you're talking about. Once Fulmer is mercifully gone, there is a better chance of Ice Capades performing in Hell than there is of me wishing he were still the head football coach.If Fulmer had been fired after 2005 and we had the type of year that we are having now all of you would be complaining that we should have never gotten rid of Fulmer so soon. People like you will never be happy.
I can't relate to booing our players and coaches. I can't relate to the drunk 20 something near our tailgate spot who was yelling "F--k Florida" at every passing Florida fan in front of my 7 year old. (I can relate to being drunk and 20 something, just not the rest.)
I was terribly disappointed in the game, but different fans handle it different ways.
all valid points. goes back to the inability or refusal to acknowledge the real status of the program. the notion of this team being close to something special, as it was apparently seen by the coaches at the time, was never countered with the notion, as it was later proven to be the case, that we're also close 7-4 or 6-5.So what is your reasoning for '02? You really think '03 and '04 made 2002 OK because we beat a Ron Zook coached Florida team 2 years in a row and owned Alabammy with Sheila at the helm? 2002 WAS the hiccup, that WAS the alarm that Fulmer was losing control. 2003 and 2004 came about and we let it go, in denial. Then 2005 comes around and it's only a tad worse than '02 simply because we lost to Vandy and didn't make a bowl.
Fast forward to today, and everyone points to 2005 as the hiccup, when it was really 2002.
And if you REALLY want to get picky, it started with the 99 recruiting class, possibly the worse Fulmer has had until this year.
There are no more excuses to be made.
Don't throw facts at the Eat, Sit, and Watch The Band Crowd. They are what they are.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
Speaking of this group. I got down into the student section Saturday. It's getting as bad as the regular sections around Neyland. Too many people there to be seen, rather than to raise hell. Arms crossed, commenting about the people raising fuss.
all valid points. goes back to the inability or refusal to acknowledge the real status of the program. the notion of this team being close to something special, as it was apparently seen by the coaches at the time, was never countered with the notion, as it was later proven to be the case, that we're also close 7-4 or 6-5.
much like the last two years. we've all seen things that gave us reason to hope. we've also seen plenty to know that we have a long way to go.
i think we know which way the staff leans on that issue.
it's no different than AF's fumbling problem being construed as a ball security problem? wtf? whatever. Fulmer has always had a knack of explaining away issues......Speaking of denial, remember during the '02 season, the excuse for the offensive inability was a bad rash of injuries, which bascially all but one major one were suffered on the DEFENSIVE side of the ball? Not to mention we were pretty healthy saving for Simon and Burnett being hurt in the two opening games...but again, they didn't play offense.
Speaking of this group. I got down into the student section Saturday. It's getting as bad as the regular sections around Neyland. Too many people there to be seen, rather than to raise hell. Arms crossed, commenting about the people raising fuss.
But the real reason I'm going to the Vandy game is because I'm deerhunting in the middle Tennessee area before the game.
I am because I am a glutton for punishment. I felt like no Tennessee fans should have been allowed to leave early Saturday, until they relented that there was an obvious problem with our coach and it needed to be corrected.
Let's not forget all the empty seats in the upper deck of the student section.
I don't know that I have ever seen as many empty seats for a 'big" game like that in 21 years of attending games there.