overseasorange2
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2006
- Messages
- 7,470
- Likes
- 4,961
Of course it was tongue in cheek. He probably assumed Rome was going to talk about his record and his future at MO and decided to preemptively change the subject. I guess he felt like TN was a convenient target to get the focus off of his crappy job. Now, since the SEC has a rule in place regarding coaches talking negatively about other SEC programs, wonder if he'll be hearing from Mr. Sankey soon?it seemed a little tongue in cheek. People are very easily upset.
it seemed a little tongue in cheek. People are very easily upset.
I don't use the word "hate" very often and certainly no where it comes to Mo. Just them being on the SEC and more especially the eastern div. (dumb) But I fear things are gonna get worse. Just what defines the southeast??
I like the enthusiasm but we need to temper our expectations. We had a great year relatively speaking and our offence lit up the scoreboard for sure. But we were a surprise to everyone last year. I think we do well this year and even improve in the W/L column but I think people will adapt to us this year and tamp down those gaudy numbers from last year. We improve on Defense and that's where we pick up the extra wins, not because our offence gets better. Realistically our offense should take a slight step back. I would love to be wrong.........but I doubt it.......
This was hardly the "trashing of UT" that was being portrayed in headlines. Consider it part of our clickbait culture...
Vols return essentially the entire o line from last season and the unit will be deeper, WR group with a legit NFL draft pick (Tillman) along with many other good prospects to develop, A QB that is arguably second best in the SEC that will playing on Sundays, Solid stable of RBs, and Two senior TEs (Jacob Warren is going to find a roster spot in league). I do not see how this offense regresses the second year in the same system with many of the same guys returning. Losing Velus Jones was a significant loss, but Heupel has shown he can develop WRs that are unproven.
For whatever reason he seems to be a media darling. Does media think he actually has something to say of relevance or do they just enjoy showing what an a$$clown he is? Most of todays media reporting is pathetic.He sure seems to talk a lot for not having much to back it up. Glad we have coach who has more class.